<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Adobe Enterprise Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.adobe.com/ADEP/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/ADEP</link>
	<description>The things you need to know to develop and run CQ, LiveCycle, and ADEP applications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:53:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ADEP/LiveCycle v10 SP1 Now Available by ndavies</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/ADEP/2011/12/adeplivecycle-v10-sp1-now-available.html#comment-8150</link>
		<dc:creator>ndavies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/ADEP/?p=3174#comment-8150</guid>
		<description>The Experience Services SP1 part of the service pack is now available.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Experience Services SP1 part of the service pack is now available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Future of LiveCycle by Josh van Tonder</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/ADEP/2012/01/the-future-of-livecycle.html#comment-8146</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh van Tonder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/ADEP/?p=3214#comment-8146</guid>
		<description>Hi Rohan,

Please see our comment below to Ketan regarding this topic.

Thanks,
Josh van Tonder
Product Marketing Manager, Adobe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rohan,</p>
<p>Please see our comment below to Ketan regarding this topic.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Josh van Tonder<br />
Product Marketing Manager, Adobe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Future of LiveCycle by Josh van Tonder</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/ADEP/2012/01/the-future-of-livecycle.html#comment-8145</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh van Tonder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/ADEP/?p=3214#comment-8145</guid>
		<description>Hi Gidget,

Please see our comment to Ketan regarding this topic.

Thanks,
Josh van Tonder
Product Marketing Manager, Adobe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gidget,</p>
<p>Please see our comment to Ketan regarding this topic.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Josh van Tonder<br />
Product Marketing Manager, Adobe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Future of LiveCycle by Josh van Tonder</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/ADEP/2012/01/the-future-of-livecycle.html#comment-8144</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh van Tonder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/ADEP/?p=3214#comment-8144</guid>
		<description>Hi Ketan,

To be clear, Adobe is still investing in LiveCycle and its business process related modules such as LiveCycle Process Management.  Together with our partners, LiveCycle will continue to be sold in all industries, not just financial services and government.   We believe LiveCycle will continue to be one of the leading business process technologies for automating forms related workflows and specific process-based use cases.  We are currently in conversation with Gartner about the published report you referenced.  

Thanks,
Josh van Tonder
Product Marketing Manager, Adobe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ketan,</p>
<p>To be clear, Adobe is still investing in LiveCycle and its business process related modules such as LiveCycle Process Management.  Together with our partners, LiveCycle will continue to be sold in all industries, not just financial services and government.   We believe LiveCycle will continue to be one of the leading business process technologies for automating forms related workflows and specific process-based use cases.  We are currently in conversation with Gartner about the published report you referenced.  </p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Josh van Tonder<br />
Product Marketing Manager, Adobe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Future of LiveCycle by Ketan Desai</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/ADEP/2012/01/the-future-of-livecycle.html#comment-8116</link>
		<dc:creator>Ketan Desai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/ADEP/?p=3214#comment-8116</guid>
		<description>I am even more utterly confused after reading this blog....
On one side Gartner is saying that Adobe is going to discontinue its Livecycle portfolio of products- http://www.gartner.com/resources/227500/227592/reassess_adobes_bpm_and_cca__227592.pdf
And on the other side, this blog says the complete opposite.
So whats the real story? Rather than blogs, is there any official news release from Adobe that can tell us whats going on? I would trust that more than blogs!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am even more utterly confused after reading this blog&#8230;.<br />
On one side Gartner is saying that Adobe is going to discontinue its Livecycle portfolio of products- <a href="http://www.gartner.com/resources/227500/227592/reassess_adobes_bpm_and_cca__227592.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.gartner.com/resources/227500/227592/reassess_adobes_bpm_and_cca__227592.pdf</a><br />
And on the other side, this blog says the complete opposite.<br />
So whats the real story? Rather than blogs, is there any official news release from Adobe that can tell us whats going on? I would trust that more than blogs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CQ5 Clientlib explained by example by Conrad</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/ADEP/2012/02/cq5-clientlib-explained-by-example.html#comment-8106</link>
		<dc:creator>Conrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/ADEP/?p=3248#comment-8106</guid>
		<description>Hi Feike, 
very nice write-up! :)
Cheers,
(c)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Feike,<br />
very nice write-up! :)<br />
Cheers,<br />
(c)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CQ5 Clientlib explained by example by Joep</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/ADEP/2012/02/cq5-clientlib-explained-by-example.html#comment-8104</link>
		<dc:creator>Joep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/ADEP/?p=3248#comment-8104</guid>
		<description>Great examples indeed!

I have been doing some research also on Clientlibs lately and I think they work great for making  your components more modular as you can include JavaScript and maybe some generic required CSS with the component instead of with the full design of the app.

@Linda: The Channels allow you to have conditional CSS and JavaScript includes...

This one will only be included if the user visits the page using Internet Explorer 6:
/etc/designs/geometrixx/clientlibs/ie6/themes/default: channels=”[ie6]&quot;

This one will NOT be included if the user visits the page using a mobile phone:
/etc/clientlibs/foundation/swfobject: channels=”[!touch]”

Although I haven&#039;t implemented the Channels myself yet, I probably will be soon... and I would really appreciate an addition to this article with a more elaborate overview of the possibilities of the Channels...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great examples indeed!</p>
<p>I have been doing some research also on Clientlibs lately and I think they work great for making  your components more modular as you can include JavaScript and maybe some generic required CSS with the component instead of with the full design of the app.</p>
<p>@Linda: The Channels allow you to have conditional CSS and JavaScript includes&#8230;</p>
<p>This one will only be included if the user visits the page using Internet Explorer 6:<br />
/etc/designs/geometrixx/clientlibs/ie6/themes/default: channels=”[ie6]&#8221;</p>
<p>This one will NOT be included if the user visits the page using a mobile phone:<br />
/etc/clientlibs/foundation/swfobject: channels=”[!touch]”</p>
<p>Although I haven&#8217;t implemented the Channels myself yet, I probably will be soon&#8230; and I would really appreciate an addition to this article with a more elaborate overview of the possibilities of the Channels&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CQ5 Clientlib explained by example by Linda Juffermans</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/ADEP/2012/02/cq5-clientlib-explained-by-example.html#comment-8103</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Juffermans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/ADEP/?p=3248#comment-8103</guid>
		<description>Great examples!

I&#039;ve noticed some cq:ClientLibraryFolder nodes have a channels (String[]) property; I can&#039;t find any documentation about these, any idea what they do?
/etc/designs/geometrixx/clientlibs/ie6/themes/default: channels=&quot;[ie6]&quot;
/etc/clientlibs/foundation/swfobject: channels=&quot;[!touch]&quot;

Suppose my &quot;project.main&quot; clientlib embeds &quot;project.components&quot; and similarly the &quot;projects.components&quot; clientlibs have a dependency for &quot;project.main&quot;. That way, the code can either include &quot;project.main&quot; (embedding all component JS in the one file) or include &quot;project.main.components&quot; (automatically including &quot;project.main&quot;). Does this make sense or will this cause conflicts/duplicates?

Linda</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great examples!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve noticed some cq:ClientLibraryFolder nodes have a channels (String[]) property; I can&#8217;t find any documentation about these, any idea what they do?<br />
/etc/designs/geometrixx/clientlibs/ie6/themes/default: channels=&#8221;[ie6]&#8221;<br />
/etc/clientlibs/foundation/swfobject: channels=&#8221;[!touch]&#8221;</p>
<p>Suppose my &#8220;project.main&#8221; clientlib embeds &#8220;project.components&#8221; and similarly the &#8220;projects.components&#8221; clientlibs have a dependency for &#8220;project.main&#8221;. That way, the code can either include &#8220;project.main&#8221; (embedding all component JS in the one file) or include &#8220;project.main.components&#8221; (automatically including &#8220;project.main&#8221;). Does this make sense or will this cause conflicts/duplicates?</p>
<p>Linda</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to Fix com.adobe.idp.scheduler.SchedulerException: Failure Occurred During Job Recovery by The LiveCycle Post &#124; How to Fix com.adobe.idp.scheduler.SchedulerException: Failure Occurred During Job Recovery</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/ADEP/2011/12/com-adobe-idp-scheduler-schedulerexception-failure-occured-during-job-recovery.html#comment-8093</link>
		<dc:creator>The LiveCycle Post &#124; How to Fix com.adobe.idp.scheduler.SchedulerException: Failure Occurred During Job Recovery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/ADEP/?p=3185#comment-8093</guid>
		<description>[...] Problem Scenario: LiveCycle uses Quartz scheduler. Typical use case is when “watched folder” endpoint related schedules get translated as quartz triggers. Quartz takes care of executing the trigger based on frequency and updates a table with the latest execution count. … Continue reading → [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Problem Scenario: LiveCycle uses Quartz scheduler. Typical use case is when “watched folder” endpoint related schedules get translated as quartz triggers. Quartz takes care of executing the trigger based on frequency and updates a table with the latest execution count. … Continue reading → [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Future of LiveCycle by Dan Riggs</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/ADEP/2012/01/the-future-of-livecycle.html#comment-8084</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Riggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/ADEP/?p=3214#comment-8084</guid>
		<description>Great news!  My LiveCyle client is pondering their annual renewal of several LiveCycle modules.  Your update is very timely and much needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great news!  My LiveCyle client is pondering their annual renewal of several LiveCycle modules.  Your update is very timely and much needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

