Legal
The views expressed in this blog are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Adobe Systems Incorporated.
Search
February
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 |
Archives
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
February 6, 2006
Redaction Part Two: Something Else You Shouldn't Do
I've received several comments about my article on redaction advocating a different method of producing the redacted PDF.
Wouldn't it be easier to just add mark-ups covering information and print it to the AdobePDF print driver instead of saving to a TIFF file?
Doesn't this "flatten" the file eliminating information underneath giving the same results?
Let me state this clearly: No it doesn't!
Read on to learn why . . .
Note: This article was written before Acrobat 8 shipped which includes built-in bullet-proof redaction tools.<\p>
12:22 PM | Permalink