<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>After Effects API Zone</title>
      <link>http://blogs.adobe.com/ae_api/</link>
      <description>Bruce Bullis&apos; weblog keeps AE&apos;s external developers updated regarding Adobe&apos;s plans for the AE APIs, provides information relevant to all developers, and generally has some fun with the AE developer crew.</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2007</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:03:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.2</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Passing the torch</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>No more SDKs for me. </p>

<p>With the completion of the CS3 launch, I've moved full-time to my new responsibilities as Engineering Manager for (formerly) Serious Magic products (OnLocation, Ultra and Visual Communicator).</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.adobe.com/ae_api/2007/10/passing_the_torch.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.adobe.com/ae_api/2007/10/passing_the_torch.html</guid>
         <category>After Effects</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:03:29 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>CS3 SDKs live!</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><br />
<a href="http://www.adobe.com/devnet/aftereffects/sdk/cs3">Give them a try.</a><br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.adobe.com/ae_api/2007/07/cs3_sdks_live.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.adobe.com/ae_api/2007/07/cs3_sdks_live.html</guid>
         <category>After Effects</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:53:58 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Such a long, long time...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, folks. It's been too long since my last post.</p>

<p>There has been plenty of action on the AE API front, but all if it NDA'd. Now the public preview is up, and you can see for yourselves what the team has been up to.</p>

<p>Marvelous.</p>

<p>Okay, back to getting this suite out the door...</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.adobe.com/ae_api/2007/05/such_a_long_long_time.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.adobe.com/ae_api/2007/05/such_a_long_long_time.html</guid>
         <category>After Effects</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 08:00:27 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Is the opposite of locked down...locked up?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Regardless of the answer to such philosophical questions, I wanted to fully endorse and support Apple's XCode 2.4.1 as a development environment for After Effects plug-ins. </p>

<p>Apple fixed the issues the After Effects team was having (and which were blocking me from using 2.4, and supporting <I>you folks'</I> usage of 2.4). </p>

<p>Onward and upward!</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.adobe.com/ae_api/2006/11/is_the_opposite_of_locked_down.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.adobe.com/ae_api/2006/11/is_the_opposite_of_locked_down.html</guid>
         <category>After Effects</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 09:50:54 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Not nearly so locked down</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to the efforts of the folks at Apple, it is now safe for After Effects developers to move to XCode 2.4.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.adobe.com/ae_api/2006/10/not_nearly_so_locked_down.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.adobe.com/ae_api/2006/10/not_nearly_so_locked_down.html</guid>
         <category>After Effects</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:06:45 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Lock-down</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>For the (completely hypothetical, you understand) next release of After Effects, we will NOT be moving to XCode 2.4, for a variety of reasons into which I will not publicly go. Suffice it to say: Known Issues™.</p>

<p>Stick with 2.3.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.adobe.com/ae_api/2006/09/lockdown.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.adobe.com/ae_api/2006/09/lockdown.html</guid>
         <category>After Effects</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 12:45:47 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Europe again</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Yikes, has it really been a month? </p>

<p>Steve Warner (Director of Engineering for our group) and I just had a fantastic trip back to Stockholm for customer visits, and then to Amsterdam for the IBC trade show. I'm digging out of my inbox now, but I wanted to post to say "Thank You!" to the customers who spent time with us, and to the AE developers who made the IBC show worthwhile.</p>

<p>Sorry folks, didn't bring a camera or the family; more pictures soon!</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.adobe.com/ae_api/2006/09/europe_again.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.adobe.com/ae_api/2006/09/europe_again.html</guid>
         <category>After Effects</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 07:28:01 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Onward and upward</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>For reasons which I won't elaborate, XCode 2.4.0 development of After Effects plug-ins is unsupported at this time.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.adobe.com/ae_api/2006/08/onward_and_upward.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.adobe.com/ae_api/2006/08/onward_and_upward.html</guid>
         <category>Code</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:43:02 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Okay, chump...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[	<p>("Chump" is self-referential...) Kids are crazy for the blogging these days. What started as an effort to communicate items of interest to developers in a more timely fashion seems to have become something more. At least, based on the feedback I get, people seem to want it to be something more. They also seem to want discounted erectile dysfunction drugs at rock-bottom prices, and pictures of adventuresome poly-sexuals. But hey, one need at a time. </p>
	<p>&#160;</p>
	<p>So, I'm going to start adding posts on development methodology,  books and articles I've found helpful (not necessarily all code-related, but within the bounds of an corporate blog), and developer-related goings-on at Adobe. That, and pictures of my kid; can't change everything at once.</p>
	<p><img src="http://blogs.adobe.com/ae_api/eyes.jpg" width="300" height="225" /></p>
	<p><BR/>
    No one's posted any feedback about my quick start development guide, which could mean any number of things. I choose to hope it means you're all well into your own development processes, and don't have time to waste posting about it on some fool's blog. So, how about it; what books, articles, or general ideas help you get your Geek on? I'll start: <a href="http://headrush.typepad.com/creating_passionate_users/">http://headrush.typepad.com/creating_passionate_users/</a></p>
  ]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.adobe.com/ae_api/2006/07/okay_chump.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.adobe.com/ae_api/2006/07/okay_chump.html</guid>
         <category>General</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 09:54:58 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>SDK Jump-start</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Let me know if this helps.</p>

<p><a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/ae_api/Head_First_Plug-in_Development.pdf">Download file</a><br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.adobe.com/ae_api/2006/07/stepbystep_xcode_project_creat.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.adobe.com/ae_api/2006/07/stepbystep_xcode_project_creat.html</guid>
         <category>After Effects</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 09:20:08 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Niggling issue w/new Mac SDK</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>So, if you're developing on a MacIntel machine, and testing with AE 7.0, you'll need to add "PowerPC" to the architectures to build, in each sample project's settings. </p>

<p>Sorry.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.adobe.com/ae_api/2006/06/niggling_issue_wnew_mac_sdk.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.adobe.com/ae_api/2006/06/niggling_issue_wnew_mac_sdk.html</guid>
         <category>After Effects</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 14:13:29 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Updated SDKs available</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Release 2 of the AE SDKs are now available:</p>

<p>http://partners.adobe.com/public/developer/aftereffects/devcenter.html</p>

<p>While there are still some rough edges, XCode 2.3 projects are provided for OS X, as are Visual Studio .NET 2005 projects on Windows.</p>

<p>In compliance with revenue recognition regulations, no new functionality is present in the updated SDKs.</p>

<p>I've received some feedback that posting irrelevant personal photos was distracting. I made sure that, in this irrelevant personal photo, I'm at least wearing an AE hat.</p>

<p><img alt="thinking_AE_thoughts.jpg" src="http://blogs.adobe.com/ae_api/thinking_AE_thoughts.jpg" width="640" height="480" /></p>

<p><br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.adobe.com/ae_api/2006/06/updated_sdks_available.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.adobe.com/ae_api/2006/06/updated_sdks_available.html</guid>
         <category>After Effects</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 08:12:13 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Know your audience</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><br />
It's tough to "aim" the After Effects SDK; it could be used for so many different things. </p>

<p>One could learn the rudiments of C or C++ based image processing, just fiddling around with the samples. One could learn about workflow automation just reading through the headers (AE_GeneralPlug.h would make most integration engineers' mouths water). </p>

<p>The SDK Guide could be a reference manual, a cookbook, a tutorial...</p>

<p>What do YOU hope to get out of the next After Effects SDK? Besides the XCode and .NET 2005 samples, I mean?<br />
<img alt="IMG_3116.jpg" src="http://blogs.adobe.com/ae_api/IMG_3116.jpg" width="640" height="480" /><br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.adobe.com/ae_api/2006/05/know_your_audience.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.adobe.com/ae_api/2006/05/know_your_audience.html</guid>
         <category>After Effects</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 12:50:33 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Hand-waving speculation</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn't an AEGP project diff tool be slick?</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.adobe.com/ae_api/2006/05/handwaving_speculation.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.adobe.com/ae_api/2006/05/handwaving_speculation.html</guid>
         <category>After Effects</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 08:02:44 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Back from Europe, back from NAB...</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Hullo!</p>

<p>Amsterdam and Stockholm were fabulous. Thanks to Jens, Nils & Peder for their offers of hospitality and assistance around Stockholm. I could visit Stockholm at one end of my IBC trip; let me know if you'd like to meet. I know this place that serves awesome reindeer...</p>

<p>___</p>

<p></p>

<p>My prediction of new SDKs containing XCode and .NET 2005 samples was overly-optimistic; the Jell-O is still setting. I'll let everyone know when they're up.</p>

<p><br />
I quite enjoyed this year's NAB (my 9th); very pleasant this year. Adobe's booth looked wonderful, standing room only. The Plug-in Pavilion had traffic and the Adobe-adjacent position seemed ideal. Over the next month or so, I plan to meet with multiple Adobe VPs to discuss improvements to how we work with developers. </p>

<p>Your input is appreciated.</p>

<p><maito:bbb@adobe.com?subject=It_would_be_better_if></p>

<p><br />
And now, the content that made me flag this with the "irrelevant" topic:</p>

<p>Noel:</p>

<p><img alt="float.jpg" src="http://blogs.adobe.com/ae_api/float.jpg" width="640" height="480" /></p>

<p><br />
Me, looking thoughtful (and furry):</p>

<p><img alt="thoughtful.jpg" src="http://blogs.adobe.com/ae_api/thoughtful.jpg" width="640" height="480" /></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blogs.adobe.com/ae_api/2006/04/back_from_europe_back_from_nab.html</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.adobe.com/ae_api/2006/04/back_from_europe_back_from_nab.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 12:01:25 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
