Innovation and the Energy Crisis
Climate change is somewhat off-topic for this blog, but it is right on target as something we all need to be talking about. At the Emerging Technologies Conference at MIT yesterday morning, there was a great panel discussion about climate change, global warming and energy solutions. I’ll share a few highlights. Any errors or misquotes are obviously my fault.
Innovation and the Energy Crisis
Moderator: Robert C. Armstrong, Professor of Chemical Engineering and co-director of the Energy Research Council, MIT
Panelists:
Joseph Romm, Founder and Executive Director, Center for Energy & Climate Solutions;
Nathan Lewis, Professor, California Institute of Technology;
Kelly R. Fletcher, Sustainable Energy Advanced Technology Leader, GE Global Research
Robert Armstrong shared some info on the energy industry. Per the MIT Energy Council Report of May 2006:
- Energy is a multi-trillion dollar industry
- We consume energy at the rate of 14 terawatts of energy of which the US uses about a quarter [a terawatt is too large an amount for me to fathom]
- Anticipate doubling total energy production by 2050
- Anticipate tripling electricity production by 2050
Joseph Romm, who has a book called Hell and High Water coming out in January, talked about the need for action now. When he talks to leading climate experts they are very alarmed. Solutions will require huge amounts of capital when the world gets serious. We have to start to deploy all possible solutions today, we can’t wait for technology to solve this in the future. Though, new technology research and development is also needed. Dr. Romm’s blog is at climateprogress.org.
Nate Williams said that things are worse than Dr. Romm indicated. The issue is not about science at this point, but about risk management. We have four options to pursue:
- clean coal – has lots of risks
- nuclear – again, lots of issues, need breeder reactors because not enough uranium…
- solar – that’s where the energy is; we need improved efficiencies/technologies; we need a way to store the energy (he likes chemical fuels)
- biofuels
Kelly Fletcher talked about the need for strong and stable government policies around CO2. Whether a tax or a trading systems, we need a clear policy.
They stated the big issue is still education – people need to be made aware of the severity of the problem and the need to take action now. There was a poll on how much more people would be willing to pay on their utility bill to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and the answer was less than $10/month. That suggests there is still not a lot of public resolve to address climate change. Even with that, the public is ahead of government leadership.
There was lots more great information and I hope to be able to post a link to a video of the panel (by keeping an eye on http://www.technologyreview.com/events/tretc/media.aspx)
Comments
Also, some parts of the public are much more informed than other parts. This is unfortunate because some of the technologies that hold the greatest potential are still relatively unknown.
Geothermal power (using existing or spent oil wells) and thorium nuclear reactors, for example, seem extremely promising (more than even existing propositions for Carbon Capture and Sequestration as Nate Williams noted). Wind and wave power must also be mentioned, as more than just an afterthought. Because there is no "silver bullet" for solving the energy crisis, our approach to problem-solving requires a multi-facetedness we are usually unaccustomed to employing.
The power of the free market may ease the burden in securing funding for where we need it, but we raise recognition of the dangers of government and big-lobby involvement. Subsidies and oil-profit-driven propaganda do far more to impede our progress than the lack of innovation.
An innovation in the way we gather ideas and implement solutions, then, may be a huge part of what is truly required to sustain our existence here.
Posted by: Eric Pan | September 29, 2006 3:02 PM
We didn't get a video of the talk, but the MP3 is at the website , or, directly
Posted by: Nabeel Al-Shamma | October 13, 2006 10:23 AM
buy internet viagra
Posted by: buy com lvivhost online viagra | November 12, 2007 5:05 PM
tysaclw mraldisuz ypzk vcsgwqph wodve nirvabxec rfomynvsl
Posted by: sqyk hwdzyun | December 6, 2007 12:08 AM