Main

October 20, 2009

New in Captivate Exchange

Captivate 4 has several avenues for possible extensions- especially given the new widgets and variables features. Captivate, like many of the other Adobe products, has an exchange where third parties can share product extensions and other assets that the larger Captivate community might find useful. While the exchange has been dormant for a while, a new set of content has been introduced on exchange this month. The new content on exchange ranges from widgets to stock animations- each of which you will find useful in enhancing the projects you create using Captivate. Most of the content on exchange is free. Even the ones you need to purchase are great value for money- given that it will allow you to differentiate your Captivate projects from the others, or achieve that special task that your customer wants executed in just this specific manner. Some of the new stuff on exchange I like are:

  1. Resume widget/ Bookmark widget- which allows your users to resume a course from the point they left off.
  2. Short answer formatting widget- that allows you to specify the font format for the short answer question type in Captivate
  3. The YAOTI animations- stock videos of actors phrasing common lines used in a course
  4. The corner peel widget- a nice fancy navigation alternative
  5. Launch Pad- a Flexible framework to launch multiple Captivate movies from one web page.

Also, if there are assets or extensions that you would like to share with or sell to the community, please submit them on exchange.

,,,

September 16, 2009

My first podcast interview

Well here’s something I did for the first time. My very first podcast interview! This has been posted on Captivating, Rick Zanotti’s popular podcast series. This was my first time in a sound recording studio. Rick has an impressive set-up consisting of shot-gun microphones, condenser microphones, large diaphragm microphones and tubes condensers and on and on... each piece mapped to a certain voice type or requirement. Not to mention the array of sound editing software used. I was impressed with the effort that goes into recording good audio for eLearning (I always thought that people plugged in a USB mic to their laptop and recorded the voiceover audio :)). I can now imagine the heartburn our Cp4 audio bug caused before it was patched!

In this 14 min interview we’ve discussed topics ranging from the Captivate 4 features, to our key focus areas, and some of the plans for the coming year. I hope you find this interesting.

...Pictures came and broke your heart, put the blame on VTR; You are a ... ;-)

September 4, 2009

eLearning in higher ed

Results from a comprehensive study conducted by APLU (Association of Public and Land-grant Universities) show that eLearning is growing rapidly in the universities. Key statistics from the survey:

“During the past decade, online learning has begun to weave into the fabric of higher education and has become the fastest growing segment,” said Peter McPherson, president of Association of Public and Land-grant Universities (A۰P۰L۰U).  “All indications are that this growth will continue”

  • Between 21% to 28% of all faculty are currently teaching online courses (staff strength 645,000).
  • Around 33% of all faculty have developed an online course (10% currently developing)
  • Nearly 64% of faculty said it takes “somewhat more” or “a lot more” effort to teach an online course compared to a face-to-face course. The results for online course development are even more striking, where more than 85% of all faculty with online course development experience said it takes “somewhat more” or “a lot more” effort.
  • While technology for online delivery is considered above avg; it is incentives for online content development and delivery which are below avg. considering the extra effort involved in creating and delivering this content, this could be an issue.
  • Around 70% of faculty believe that the learning outcomes of online learning are inferior to F2F. But, only 48% of faculty who’ve developed or delivered an online course believe that online eLearning outcomes are inferior

You can read the entire report here

,

August 28, 2009

Open letter to our customers on the recent Customer Support issues

In the recent past, there have been increasing incidences of dissatisfaction with Adobe's customer support. I've personally tracked and escalated some of this chatter from forums like Twitter and Facebook (Ellen, we heard you :)). Below is an open letter, from Adobe's VP for Tech Support- Lambert Walsh, on what is being done to address this situation.


,,

August 27, 2009

What are we assessing?

In old computer terminology we used the phrase "garbage in and garbage out". Our school and learning systems have unwittingly added a third element - "garbage tracked".

Calvin in another strip comments, that it is no point going to school as he never learns anything there that he wants to learn. As I reflect back to my schooling days, I can hardly recollect a class in a new semester (or terms as we call them in India) starting off where the teacher explained why spending my quality time with him over the next 3 months is worthwhile to ME.

There was the false assumption that I somehow knew why I was appearing for a class. Sure in college that was sometimes the case, but there was often a realization in the middle of the semester that there is a mismatch in expectation and reality.

So without a clear understanding of why the year 1620 (in the above cartoon) was important, how many students are simply going through the system manipulating the system?

August 18, 2009

Key update for Adobe Presenter

Adobe Presenter, one of the key rapid authoring tools in the Adobe eLearning suite, will be releasing an important product update in the next few weeks. Paresh Kharya, the PM for Adobe Presenter, has covered some of the key highlights of this release in his post on the Connect User Forum.

Couple of key feature enhancements that I’m very excited about in this update are:

  • Improved PowerPoint Conversion and PPTX format support: This update would include support for various PowerPoint SmartArt Animations. It would now be possible to work with and synchronize PowerPoint SmartArt animations. This release would include enhancements for improving the flash conversion fidelity of embedded images in PowerPoint. The release would also enhance the conversion fidelity for various text and shape effects created in PPTX format. Resolved issues where alternative text inserted using PowerPoint was not being exposed to screen readers. Based on what I’ve seen, the PPT conversion capability with this update will whip the other presenters out there.
  • Tighter integration of Captivate Content in Presenter: We have enhanced the support for embedding Captivate created flash content in Presenter presentations. Captivate content having full motion recordings would now play properly without the need to manually copy the Captivate output files to Presenter data folder. We have also fixed issues related to loss of display fidelity when Captivate content would sometimes get imported with incorrect dimensions.

,,

Become a Captivate Community expert

Here’s another way of sharing your expertise with other Captivate and eLearning Suite users! The Adobe Community Publishing 1.1 beta is live. This new AIR app lets anyone with an Adobe ID publish content on Adobe products and technology directly to Adobe.com. You can contribute tips, movies, code snippets and more with easy-to-use templates. Plus, everyone in the community can rate and comment on contributions. This will help get you featured on our community pages and with enough contributions be on your way to becoming an Adobe Community Expert.

Contributing is easy

1. Download the Community Publishing app: http://www.adobe.com/community/publishing/download.html

2. Author your tip using a simple template

3. Publish it to adobe.com

Contributions are moderated by community experts. Content goes live within minutes and is automatically added to community help search. Exceptional contributions will be promoted in Help & Support pages, Developer Connection, Design Center, and considered for inclusion in Adobe partner publications. Also, if you are currently active on the adobe.com forums, and are interested in becoming a moderator for the Adobe Captivate Help and Support pages, do drop me a line.

,

August 17, 2009

Are we human or are we dancers

,,,,,

Is Brandon Flowers and KILLERS thinking of eLearning, when he sings this song? Nah! too much to expect. But, listening to this song yesterday for the nth time got me thinking.

So I downloaded the lyrics and tried to look at them this time through the learning eyes. Are we creating eLearning content which is meant for human learning, or are we creating instructional content which is meant to disseminate instructions and hope to provoke expected actions? Maybe we need to "cut the chord" of control and allow a lot of constructivism to take place.

Are we focussed on tactical performance support instead of building on the cognitive infrastructure of learning ? Will our learners sing " my signs are vital, my hands are cold, And I'm on my knees looking for the answer " whenever they faced with a problem with a twist? Or, do we expect application of PSS in real life will lead to internalization of learning?

I do see some elements of constructivism and cognitivism in instrcutional design, but most of the content that we encounter today unfortunately does reinformces what Jones, Li, and Merrill [1990] said : "Instruction, in large measure, communicates accepted meaning. The developer of instruction explicitly desires that the learner adopt themeaning intended by the developer, and not reach a separate and personal interpretation of that meaning. . . . [M]ost instruction . . . concerns
transferring, as effectively and efficiently as possible, determined interpretations."

[1] Jones M.K., Li Z., Merill M.D. Domain Knowledge representation of Instructional Analysis, Educational technology, October 1990, 30(10).

August 13, 2009

eLearning to suit my moods

,,,

Yesterday, I wanted to look up the equation for an ellipse. And I wanted to find this information quickly. So I went to wikipedia typed ellipse and frantically (skimming paragraphs) went over the page, found the information and exited the page. Last week a visit to wikipedia on a related topic on Lithium saw me diving deep into this mazing mineral on whose availability a lot of green movement in based upon. By the way, I learnt that Chile and Bolivia control almost 90% of world's reserves!

So what is it about ellipse that got be so agitated and frantic? And what in lithium caused me to engage in deeper learning? If you look at the pages, nothing specifically jumps out as being the driver behind this disparate behavior to knowledge.

So was the issue lying with me? Did the dual pressure of a deadline and picking up my daughter from skating had anything to do with the frantic behavior, as opposed to a more relaxed post-prandial online walk on the information highway searching for lithium? I am inclined to believe yes.

This is not something we have not experienced with respect to other digital content around us. This is not surprising because the consumer experience with the content is the ultimate barometer of content quality.

In an instructor-lead training (ILT), a good instructor is able to gauge the feedback from the learners in front of her and is able to tailor the instruction (whether they do or not is another matter). The learner does provide verbal/non-verbal feedback but the responsibility of acting on it remains the instructors.

However, in eLearning the instructor/learner feedback mechanism is broken. And with it the ability of the instruction to tailor itself to my moods.

But, does it have to be that way? It is possible that the instructor can anticipate eLearning scenarios based on her experience in the ILT world. Attaching FAQ to various sections of the courses could facilitate rapid information aquisition, while facilitating a learner to take a deep dive. Intelligent usage of branching functionality in various authoring tools like Adobe captivate allow instructors to create a course which is essentially 2-dimensional.

The instructor can also create courses that track user's responses and use those trackings to navigate users in the optimum manner. For example, if the user is making wrong choices it is possible to take the user to parts of the course which explains the problematic concept in greater detail. For learners who understood the concept straightaway, this detour is not visible.

Self-paced learning is often promoted as a huge win for eLearning over ILT. Unfortunately for most of eLearning content, it is actually self-paced completion of a course/content. What we are talking about here is to refocus on the learning.

August 11, 2009

Maintaing Courses For Globalized Businesses

,,,,,

The two most important questions that a learner needs to ask is the "who" and "what" question. In the globalized world, the who question seldom returns a set of learner who are homogenous. The set of potential learner for a course could be from different geography, having different cultural backgrounds and language preferences. Indeed some maybe operating in somewhat different business environments.

 

The easy and potentially expensive solution would be to reduce this diversity into smaller homogenous groups and then create a course for each and every of these groups. Course maintenance to take care of updates could become tricky, as changes in the common parts of the course needs to be updated across the variants. Embracing the reuse mantra in SCORM through creation of reusable modules (called SCO in SCORM-talk) and then packaging them through tools like the Adobe SCORM Packager (part of the Adobe eLearning Suite), or Adobe Captivate Aggregator functionalily. This will allow you to reduce maintenance efforts and ensure that changes made to common modules have been deployed across all variants uniformly.

 

Localization of content is a significant challenge in our rapidly globalized workplace. IT training on new software from Adobe, Microsoft, SAP, Oracle etc. are localized in tens (indeed hundreds in some cases) of languages as business is no longer restricted in Americas or EMEA. Soft-skills training need to be localized as also globalized to take into account cultural sensitivities. The traditional SLA between client and content creator required that all content be externalized, so that they can be changed by the client without the engagement of the vendor. Content as in audio, video, graphics, text.

 

While this does work in theory, often it creates a situation where we are trying to fit a round nail through a square hole! Trying to ensure that the German text fits into the space vacated by the English space can require more iterations than we think. In software development, we can create a dialog box which may have some strings ending with "...". Or get strings truncated. Can we afford the same in eLearning?  Now try doing the same with audio and video! Customers having paid for the externalisation framework, often enough find themselves back to the vendors to make changes that they thought they would be making internally.

 

An alternate methodology maximizes the usage of rapid tools like Adobe Captivate in content creation and content integration. This would allow you to maintain the content and effect small changes to the content internally (and in cases in local offices) using resources who are icon-draggers with no scripting skills. And all this without any reduction in learnability of the content.

 

While major changes will still require a call to the vendor, we save significantly overall if we use rapid tools and reuse.

August 10, 2009

Learning 2.0 - Make learning deliver

,,,,,

This month's Big Question on the Learning Circuits Blog asks 'What new skills and knowledge are required for learning professionals?'

I suspect a lot of the X 2.0 discussions have within themselves elements of Web 2.0. Instantiating Learning for X, we also notice the same shades.

Where things get skewed is the tendency to look at learning 2.0 through the narrow lenses of Web 2.0 technologies. Tim O'Reilly's "What is Web 2.0?" talks about the "customers are building your businesses for you" - it is important to harness user generated content to extract business value.

If we look beyond Web 2.0 technologies and focus on learning , let us see how learners are participating in creating content FOR L&D, and what skills are required to focus on to facilitate that? I purposely talk about focus, and not learn as these are not necessarily new skills - Clive Shephard mentions that in his post on this topic.

Fundamentals Have not Changed

Dr. Gart Woodill in an article written in 2004, titled "Where is the learning in eLearning?..." write about the need to address the two fundamental questions of who and what. That has not changed. Jay Cross mentions in his post of the need to be able to sit with your sponsors within your organizations and understand these questions.

In these "who" meetings it is important to be able to understand what is the profile of the target audience not simply in terms of demographics, but also in terms of how the training is going to be a win for the learner. For example, lot of the compliance training is primarily looked upon as a check box item in an organization. Would it not be a lot more engaging if the learner was educated on the relevancy of the compliance in their work, and not asked to take because some senator-congressman pair called Sarbanes and Oxley has mandated them to do so. Part of the "who" questionnaire needs to consider the "when" question - when will the training be accessed (office, on the road, customer site etc.).

The when and the who will define how the learning will be delivered. It is here I liked the post by Karyn Romeis, where she makes a good case for not biting ones tongue in meetings with the stakeholders, but be able to weigh in with suggestions on the pros and cons of possible designs and modes of deployment.

Recession Driven Opportunity

When i meet folks, a lot of the talk of late has been around doing how do we stretch the learning dollar. On the expense side there has been talk around doing more eLearning, and then more rapid eLearning. This seems to be the discussion having more traction - because it gives the L&D something to do all by themselves.

Feedback - Insist on It

The more difficult one is to be able to make an impact on the revenue side of things. While difficult , this has a better chance of creating "learning culture" the lack of which we often lament.

So how do we do it? Insist that once we have created the training (to the best of our ability and based on the information gathered), we need to put in place practices which will track whether it actually worked in real life and delivered the benefits it was supposed to deliver.

The involvement of the L&D does not stop at the delivery/deployment of training. L&D departments must educate and insist that line managers provide proper feedback on the training efficacy, so that future projects (or sometime current projects) can be created keeping these learnings in mind. A SOX training in an Accounts department does not reduce the number of SOX audit queries is not delivering the goods. Similarly, if the number of meetings ending without decisions continue to rise then the training on "Having difficult discussions" possibly did not have the necessary impact.

Too often courses are deployed in one department to another without taking due advantage of feedback from the earlier departments. So boxes get checked without any impact on business. And we know what happens to budgets that do not have any benefits associated with it.

Do not expect the line managers to always come with the feedback metrics (audit reports, indecisive meeting count etc.). The learning professional may have to discover this in conjunction with the line managers. If there is none, the training is possibly not worth anyone's time. So be ready to walk away!

If you are not harnessing customer feedback, you are not letting then them build your business. And that is simply not Learning 2.0.

June 25, 2009

The World At The End of Recession-Greener and Leaner...

,,,

And more inclusive? I am allowed to dream once in a while.

I was in Washington DC to attend the ASTD conference earlier this month and was lucky to catch this great interview on TV with Anne Mulcahy, CEO Xerox Corporation, Eric Schmidt, CEO Google and James W. Owens, CEO Caterpillar. The 3 CEOs spend most of time analyzing the current business environment and how its is affecting their specific business. They also gave some insight as to how these great corporations see the world at the end of the recession.

The first key takeaway from the interview was that while there was no consensus to when the recession will end, they all agreed that the world that we are going to emerge in will be very different than the one that we went in.

The second key takeaway is the growing realization that the business world will grow more global and not less and the ability to globalize operations and market reach will become significantly more essential for success than it is today.

While at ASTD, meeting the learning vendors on the exhibition floor, one gets the feeling that there is a increasing demand for consultancy services around "how-do-we-more-with-less" and "how-do-we-do-things-differently".Also metquite a few people who approached us with a common problem "Have a mandate to move to eLearning-how do I get there?"

Travel budgets have been cut most aggressively - do not have the official data from ASTD, but it seemed that every other person we met was from DC, Maryland, Virginia and Pennsylvania. Last year at San Diego we had a large contingent from India, China - this time the only foreigners I met was from South America and Mexico, besides a really interesting Danish professor who tries hard to look at the ADDIE model upside down (material for another post!).

Companies - well most of them will survive this recession. But, they will be doing so by monitoring their expenses and realizing that they can deliver the same amount by spending less. The buying public would be expected to spend once again, but will spend differently. China, Brazil, India will spend more, the developed world will possibly spend differently. So top line and bottom lines will again grow but expect the drivers to be different.

Put this together and we are looking at a major change - in attitude, skill sets, and cross-cultural sensitiveness. I came across a lot more companies in the cultural training business this time at ASTD that I thought I did in San Diego. In an earlier post I talked about the changing demographics in the workplace and potential impact it would have in how we deliver training to them - some people are talking about the death of the course and the classroom. I believe though these obituaries are premature, the trends are not.

Learning's roadmap from classroom to eLearning will happen driven by the forces of economy (travel costs etc.), globalisation (more travel costs), workforce mobility (scheduling headaches etc). Green learning would be driven by technology addressing economic and social concerns of the organisation.

The younger workforce also does not care much for sysnchronous communication, and embraces async. methods - learning communications would be no different. While both sync. as well as async. will be expected to co-exists, the learning hours will trend significantly towards async. if not already.

Technology acceptance and comfort amongst Boomers differed from country to country, which possibly was a hindrance for spread of eLearning across the regions. But, as Internet pulled the world closer over the last decade, the younger folks in India and China have computer literacy levels which rivals those in the western world. Learning departments can now deliver content uniformly across a globally dispersed workforce.

The next challenge is localization and cultural sensitiveness/relevance in content. It would be important to create content in a manner which will facilitate localization services (technology or manual), and content development tool should have architectures to support this need.

The cultural part potentially will need human intervention through local maintenance of a global content. This would indicate that the content maintenance process needs to be in a scripting-free rapid frame work, else the cost of content re-engineering would be prohibitive.

I suspect a lot of learning strategies in most organizations has grown in incrementally and tactically over the years. The great churn that we are witnessing in the business environment allows us to take this opportunity to refactor the current learning platform  or indeed ring in a new platform instead - which is strategically aligned to deliver the business goals, leveraging the technology trends that we are witnessing today, and aimed at addressing the needs of the changing workforce.

June 18, 2009

New Lynda.com tutorial on Captivate 4

Lynda.com has just launched a new Captivate 4 tutorial. This is authored by Tim Plummer, Jr. The tutorial covers the essentials of Captivate 4. Tim is a Sr. Solutions Engineer in Adobe Sales and has extensive experience both as an educator and as a presenter. He provides a unique perspective covering the features not just from a traditional elearning angle- but also talks about how Captivate can be used to create good looking projects for high impact communication. In this vein, he refers to Captivate as ‘Flash, for the rest of us’.

For a $25 monthly subscription, one can access all the courses on Lynda.com, which includes the latest set of tools offered in the Adobe eLearning Suite and CS4. The Captivate 4 course runs 4 hrs and is organized into 4-5 min modules. By the end of this, the learner will have a strong foundation on Captivate 4. Tim even covers some of the more involved Captivate 4 features like ‘variables’ in this essentials training. I do believe there are a some useful features that have not been covered- including the current favorite Text-to-speech, Advanced actions, and Aggregator. I have linked to some material on this blog which should help with these features; also, another good source for this training is Kevin Siegel’s book on Captivate 4.

Also check out the set of 'getting started' tutorials offered by Adobe.

,

June 8, 2009

Soundbooth Integration with Captivate

Adobe Soundbooth and Adobe Captivate are tightly integrated in the new Adobe eLearning Suite.

We already know that Captivate audio can be edited using Adobe Soundbooth but now it comes with new enhanced functionality. Now developers can actually edit multiple audio files inside Soundbooth and bring all the changes inside Captivate with just one click.

Consider a user working on a 10 slide Captivate project. He has three audio files in library which he uses on slide 3, 4 and 5 respectively. Now what if user wishes to edit audio on all three slides using Soundbooth?

He can just select multiple audio files and select “edit with Soundbooth”. Then all the audio files are made available in the Soundbooth ‘Files’ panel. User can then select each file and edit it one at a time. Once it is done, he simply needs to click ‘save all’ and that’s it!

All the audio edits are saved and reflected both in the Captivate library and on the associated slides where these audio files were being used. Thus just with one click, users can now save all the edited audio from Soundbooth back into Captivate, without loosing the slide associations.

Please see a demo of the same scenario here

Do try out this productivity enhancing functionality and let us know your experience with it.

 


,,

May 18, 2009

This Captivate Blog is now part of eLearningLearning!

We're delighted to announce that the Adobe Captivate Blog has joined the eLearning Learning community. eLearning Learning is "a community that tries to collect and organize the best information on the web that will help you learn and stay current on eLearning." We believe this will now allow the Captivate community to keep track of both the product related posts and broader eLearning news and info from a single location. eLearning Learning aggregates my favorite blogs like Clive on Learning, eLearning Technology, and many others. This community aggregator has been a huge benefit for me, as it enables me to access a range of regularly updated e-learning content from a single RSS feed.

May 11, 2009

The beta for Captivate on Mac!

,,

Yes, that's right, the early builds of Captivate on Mac are ready and we would like some volunteers to test this out. We need testers with many different backgrounds and system configurations for trying the new features and providing feedback (you don't have to be an existing user to participate).

If you are interested in helping us finding any bugs and providing feedback, please complete the:
Prerelease Interest Form
In the question 'why do you want to participate in the pre-release program?'- please do mention your interest in the Mac version among other things.

FYI: If you are selected as a participant, you will be contacted when we start the prerelease program.


May 8, 2009

Captivate wins CODiE- Best Corporate Learning Solution!

Our previous Captivate version, Captivate 3, has trumped the latest versions from our competition to win Software & Information Industry Association's 24th Annual CODiE Award for Best Corporate Learning Solution 2009.
"Now in its 24th year, the CODiE Awards continue to recognize those companies providing the best new technology products and services across a broad array of industries," noted SIIA President Ken Wasch. "In addition, its winners are a prolific testament to the power of technology to deliver innovative solutions to businesses and consumers...."

Adobe Captivate 4 was not eligible to compete for this award as the product was launched in 2009. But as mentioned in several reviews on the web, the feature packed Captivate 4 is the biggest release in Captivate's history. This underlines the faith the community has placed in the product. eLearning Guild's reports and surveys have indicated that close to 70% of this community uses Captivate.

Adobe has also won in the categories of best productivity solution, best communication solution, best document management solution, and best multi-media solution.

April 29, 2009

Driving the collaboration cycle

,,,,

Quoted from http://blogs.adobe.com/captivate/elearning_this_week/:

 

The Adobe Captivate Blog: eLearning this week Archives

 

Last week's post raised the question: Why would the author of a content be willing to share the authorship with someone who has provided a comment or criticism to his content? 

There are three sets of people whose interests needs to be satisfied. The first is the consumer of the content, second is the author, and the third the collaborator. It would be useful to maintain an eLearning context in the following discussions.

The author is sharing his knowledge with the consumer with an eye on self-promotion, monetary benefits or pure goodness of heart.

The consumer is primarily interested in the accuracy and quality (aesthetics, engagement, style, layout etc. )of the content and the author would like to ensure that the content is delivering an engaging experience. The name of the author is interesting, but not central to the consumer. In fact, most times people remember the author when the content WOWs (or shocks) them or falls well below expectation.

If the collaborator is able to significantly add value to a content, which introduces WOW elements in an otherwise average content, it is interesting for the author to consider sharing the "glory of authorship" with this collaborator. On this question of incremental value, it will not be surprising to find differing opinions between the author and collaborator. And without transparency into this process, collaboration will not be worth the effort.

So the challenge is to have a rendering platform which allows discoverability and linking of collaborative elements, without disrupting the overall experience of consumption. It should also allow for community ranking of collaborative elements, whereby level of acknowledgement is determined by the consumers and not ONLY by the author.

How does a blog, deliver on these requirements?  The separation of comments from the post ensure unchanged user experience vis-a-vis the main post. The comments are easily discovered, but these elements are not contextual, sometimes linking back to the context in the main post is a trying process. One way to solve the problem as a lot of us realized (and possibly not learnt by this author!) is to have a small post. But there is no ranking facility, and the collaborator gains no recognition. While operationally commenting is simple, the effort is simply not worth for most readers.

A Wiki does a good job of providing collaboration in context, but the original authors contribution can be mercilessly edited or modified. The success of wikipedia does seem to indicate that there are people who are willing to take that "abuse" - but for most this is not their day job. In a day-job environment, most people have too much riding on the authorship to survive an environment where their "authorship" is designed to be eroded.

I like a Wikis inherent ability to "correct" itself, ensuring content fidelity, though the fresness quotient of a Wiki is directly related to the participation of its members. Wikis have gained traction within smaller groups and is an important eLearning tool, but they have worked where establishing authorship was not very important or authorship was clearly assumed - e.g. product design wikis, program tracking wikis etc.

Emails, of all things does address some of the issues - contextual, clear acknowledgement of authors and collaborators. But the problem of email is their inability to aggregate multiple threads of the same conversation. Gmail did that, and it as great selling point - but the aggregation is not without bugs. Of course, you do not vote on each others emails. Thank God for small mercies!

Social commenting tools are just that - commenting tools not collaboration platforms.

If we throw in the added dimension of increasing use of rich media in eLearning, we have added technological as well as UX (user experience) barriers. Came across this article on video-wikis, but appears that this maybe a few years from maturity. For now, video content or Flash content seems to be static - not amenable to storage of comment or ranking.

eLearning used to mean online, now there is an increasing offline-online trend to content delivery. eLearning used to mean LMS and formal assessment, now there is a huge growth in non-formal learning. In the absence of the perpetual network, or the background server how do we collaborate? Can platforms like Adobe AIR provide the technology answers, if not also the UX ones?

April 10, 2009

Fuelling the Collaboration Engine...

,

Let us consider the following questions:

  1. When we use a spell-checker in our word-processing tool, and we want to use a word which is not in the dictionary, do we use the "Add to Dictionary" option?
  2. Would many people write to the "Letters to the Editor", if the newspaper policy did not allow the authors name to be printed?
  3. Would wikipedia have worked simply in a blog format ?

I am assuming that a majority answer would be Yes, No, No.

A typical collaboration workflow needs to be:

The actions marked in red are those managed by the original author, while the green elements represent "audience" touch-points.

In a typical "sage on stage" learning through the written/spoken word, the left side of the graph is a problem well solved.

However, to drive the right-side collaboration loop there has to be enough incentive for all the actors to sustain the cycle. The "audience" as well as the sage.

So what are the incentives that could motivate the "audience" ?

Analysing the answers to the questions at the beginning of the post provides possible answers.

  1. Yes - People collaborate with the tool (by adding to the tool knowledge) because they feel that it will have a positive impact to their future productivity. If the word is not a frequently used word, it is possible that the person may choose not to use the "Add to Dictionary" option.
  2. No - People want recognition for their contribution.
  3. No - People want their contribution to be a part of the knowledge not as a comment. What this means is that over a period of time, the cycle on the left will increase in redness and the "audience" becomes the authors.

So to facilitate collaboration, it is important for organizations to create an environment (policy, technology) which delivers the above, and wait. Do not mandate, or lecture or hold ROI seminars. Like most cyclical things in nature, it takes time to start and gather speed, and then nothing can stop it.

And why would the sage agree to an perceived erosion of his pre-eminent position in the pecking order?


April 9, 2009

Workforce learning in 2019: Finding patterns in a Clouded Crystall Ball

,,,,,,,

John Medina in his keynote address at the eLearning Guild November 2008 conference talked about how the fundamentals of how a person learns do not change decade on decade – in fact, it is an evolutionary process. Believing in John (and I am not suggesting that we should not) leads us to a scenario where the workplace learning environment will not be significantly different than what we see today. However, our knowledge of this learning process is very far from complete. As our understanding of our learning processes improves, expect to see changes taking place to take advantage of the same.

Crystal ball gazing is hazardous in the best of times, and in the current uncertain times, the ball does seem particularly cloudy. But, let us indulge ourselves and try and look for patterns in the clouds.

Changing demographics

In 2019, the US workplace will be 10 years “younger”! Meaning folks who are too young to enter the workforce in 2009, would have entered by 2019, and the current old folks would have retired.  While this change is very similar to any previous decade, the next 10 years bears special significance.

Currently, the digital natives of the GenY generation (less than 24 years of age) constitute around 14% of the US civilian workforce. In 2019 this percentage would have jumped to 35-40%. Importantly, more than 50% of the middle management positions would be held by digital natives, compared to none today, the remaining being filled by the digital citizens of the GenX generation.  30-50% of the managers in 2019 would be having of them having online profiles, and actively participate in social networking. So learning decision makers along with learning consumers will not only understand the technology in learning, but will actually “get” it.

So expect to see continued increase in eLearning in the learning blend (the blend will remain), with increasing focus on embedded learning and performance support systems. I will also stick my neck out and suggest that the current economic downturn will drive a trend of measuring learning effectiveness through business metrics (sales, churn, defect rates, opex etc.) and not simply through LMS scorecards. And this trend will endure. I would expect to see (actually like to see) integration of LMS with ERP systems in larger enterprises, or a totally new brand of talent tracking architecture.

Education

The situation in the education world would however be different. Studies conducted by EDUCAUSE Center For Applied Research (ECAR) on undergraduate students in US found that the number of students wanting extensive use of IT in their courses remaining fairly constant at around 22% when comparing with data collected in 2004, 2006, 2007. So the GenY digital natives seem to continue to have a preference for the human-touch in colleges. Remembering John’s comment at the beginning, I expect that this trend not to change significantly over the next 10 years.

At the same time the studies did indicate that seniors have higher preference for IT. These students are now more comfortable in their colleges, and are able to take advantage of the benefits of eLearning namely self-paced, collaboration with others etc. In the coming years expect this trend to accelerate whereby seniors, post-graduate students will embrace eLearning in a big way and expect the colleges to facilitate this process through improved CMS(Course management systems) and collaboration platforms.

So expect the growth on online universities and universities offering online courses to continue. The challenge here is content creation. Universities may opt out of packaged content, as content will be king and the key differentiator between offerings in 2019 as delivery of these courses become commoditized. While current level of online content creation at most universities remain less than satisfactory, as GenX and GenY increase their presence in the faculty, expect to see a positive impact on content volume.

Authoring Tools

GenY have grown up with rich-media and have a significant difference in attitude from the Gen X.  While sharing with an audience, GenX will pay special attention to try and create a seminal document which will be appreciated by ALL in the audience. As I study my daughter’s generation (age 11) I am simply amazed by their willingness to share anything and everything they creates with scant regard for acceptance by the WHOLE audience – they are trying to make connections with people who like their work and simply ignore others who do not.  This not only results in a higher inclination to share (of course it does, as has been well documented), but it leads to a greater NEED to create.

People will want to create and communicate and do this quickly and without “due process”.  Authoring tools will need to support mashups, but I suspect that tools themselves need to be created as a mash-up of tools.  Each constituent tool in the final mash-up relate to a specific media (text, audio, video etc.)  and addressed a specific skill level.  Not really far-fetched as a technology – look at Microsoft Office or some elements of the Adobe Creative suites. The challenge (technical and business) would be to allow users to do the mash-up instead of the vendors. Will this happen – I do not know. But, tools will drive democratizing of content creation, will drive rapid creation, will have an online presence, and will be available as service.

Mobility and Learning

netBook sales penetration.png Netbooks had a market share of 19% of the laptop market (around 10%of all PCs) in the December 2008, starting at less than 1% in July 2008. This is indeed phenomenal growth, partly driven by the economy, and partly because they provide a solution which is right-sized to the demand – wireless internet access, web browsing and ability to run web applications running on the cloud, and a 7-12” screen. 97% of these run Windows XP though Linux and Google’s Android will make an impact in the coming years. The pricing starts at $299 – and this is ONLY the first year for NetBooks!  Expect the price to fall below $100 soon as demand picks up.

NetBooks will have a tremendous impact on how learning is delivered – more specifically how mLearning evolves. The larger screen tackles the problem of the form-factor that sometimes paralyzes mLearning decision making. Content can now be effectively created for the desktop and with little or no change be effectively delivered across a mobile platform.

On the other hand, we have iPhone at around $250. There are a whole range of offerings from NOKIA, HTC which will compete in this space and providing fresh opportunities to mLearning content creation and deployment.

So mLearning will thrive happen in 2019, but it will be simply called eLearning.

Immersive Learning

This is also known as serious games in popular literature. I expect the term “serious games” to be extinct by 2019, and possibly the only prophesy I am willing to put my money on. Calling a learning style as serious games sucks out all the fun from learning and raises images of solemn monks in a far-away monastery reciting mantras, chants, hymns.

Learning through immersive simulation is getting a lot of airwaves, but not much action on the ground. There is good logic to support that GenX and Boomers are challenged in their ability to navigate a virtual 3D immersive world. But, as I mentioned earlier, the audience is changing whereby the GenY generation has been bought up on a healthy diet of immersive casual/core gaming.

There are some challenges that need to be overcome on the creation side. Immersive games today can be quite expensive to create and difficult to maintain in-house.  However, I expect to see continued development of templatized approach in creation where it would be possible to create immersive games without first conquering the steep 3D curve.  Virtual world are already investing in technology which will allow a wider audience to participate in their world, though I feel adoption of virtual worlds in learning will continue to be flattish.

Collaboration and what -do-we-call-that Learning

Is it not surprising that we are struggling to provide a name to the most natural form of learning that all humans participate in? We have called it informal learning (do not trivialize learning, we are told!), then some non-formal learning (can we define something by what it is not !). Companies has already trademarked Natural learning, Organic learning so we cannot use them. Then, there is a theory on social learning. So, what do we call it ? Let us call it social learning for sake of convenience.

A big push will come from an increasing out-of-office workforce. While the number of people working from home-offices has been on the rise for some time, this economy will give it a definitive push. Companies like IBM claim to already have around 40% of their workforce not working from an office desk. Once companies figure out a way to make this model work, it makes economic sense to continue.

What will this decentralized workplace learning look like? It has flavors of mobile. But, the people are not really mobile, but simply remote to one another. The social learning across cubicles, at the watering holes will no longer be possible. A different kind of social learning model needs to evolve to keep these remote folks remain connected.  Effective Multi-channel video conferencing will become necessary, but it will need to be complemented by improved asynchronous collaboration to increase – wikis, blogs etc. These Web 2.0 methods will not remain underground as they are today in lots of organizations, but will become mainstream.

As mentioned earlier, the GenY loves to share/create. I expect that the problem of content freshness that plagues most blogs and websites will reduce, though not disappear. And an active contributor base is a great way to improve the accuracy and relevance of the content.

The old fears around accuracy, control on information will continue for some more time, but eventually fall by the wayside. Someone mentioned to me at one of my sessions at the eLearning Guild Conference that emails are considered mainstream, but does anyone bother to ensure the accuracy of each email conversation.

Wikis and blogs will also go the same way in gaining acceptance – the digital natives will make it happen. While text will continue to dominate, rich media will continue its upward trend. Expect to see a lot more of rich-media commenting, that too in situ!

In a distributed environment, discovery of learning resources both human and electronic will become very important. Search engines currently search HTML. PDF and more recently SWFs, will extend to cover all media (images, video, audio).  Current developments do point at possible direction of technology in these areas, but expect to see a holistic search engines in the future.


April 8, 2009

The new look Captivate forum

,

Many of you might not be aware of one of the most valuable online resources Captivate has- the Captivate Forum on Adobe.com. This forum is supported by a community of passionate Captivate experts who respond to every conceivable issue and problem you might run into. Many of them have been involved with this product for much longer than the current development team, and have contributed significantly to this product's growth.
This forum has now been revamped with a much cooler UI, new features and an overhaul of the underlying technology to improve overall user experience.

Some of the changes include:

  • Improved search: Search the entire collection of forums using wildcards, fuzzy search, proximity search, weighted search, and Boolean search via the powerful new search functionality. You can also limit your search to the title, body, or attachment.
  • E-mail connection: Receive messages directly in your e-mail inbox by subscribing to forums or threads of interest. You can even post messages by replying from your e-mail program.
  • RSS support: Subscribe to RSS feeds on your favorite forums.
  • Rich text editor: Use the rich text editor to create posts, add attachments, and embed images. (you can now attach Cp movies showing the issue or the steps to be followed to fix something)
  • Ability to get noticed: Earn points through participation that demonstrate your expertise in the community.

I would like to give a shout out to rick, larry, joe, marc, eric, steve, john, frank and the rest of the community experts and thank them for their contributions. So the next time you have a Captivate or eLearning Suite related question go right to the forum.


March 30, 2009

Round-up of Captivate events

,

Some good Captivate podcasts and webinars have been posted on the net recently.

  1. Rick Zanotti, who's been involved with Captivate since the Robodemo days has a very popular podcast series titled 'Captivating'. He's just posted two new episodes on audio import and branching menus.
  2. RJ Jacquez, our eLearning evangelist, has also posted a 'Captivate 4- getting started with new features' eLearning session. This is a great tutorial on the new features in Captivate 4 with simulations that learners can walk thru at their own pace. Feel free to reach out to me or RJ if you have any questions on the features discussed in this eLearning session.


March 20, 2009

Customizing Text to Speech Pronounciations

,,

Adobe Captivate 4 has come up with a new feature "Text To Speech" which is really a key feature for any rapid authoring tool. It includes a male voice and a female voice which provides a nice natural speech. But have you ever encountered a situation where, your Speech Agent does not pronounce the word as you want it to? We have a solution.

'Text To Speech Dictionary' is the functionality you should look for. Today we provide you a basic demo of how to make Text to Speech alter the pronunciations.

Actually its very simple. If you have installed Text to Speech Utility and Captivate 4, then a tool called 'Text to Speech Dictionary' is available at \Program Files\adobe\Adobe Captivate 4\VT\\M16\bin. Reach the location and look for "UserDicEng.exe"

Double click the EXE and it will launch 'English User Dictionary Editor". Now follow the below steps in order to change the pronunciation of any particular word.

1. Click File Open and point it to the dictionary file. It is located at -
\Program Files\adobe\Adobe Captivate 4\VT\\M16\data-common\userdict\
2. This directory will store the word you enter along with its new pronunciation
3. Click "Add word" and enter the 'original word'. e.g 'Jimmy'
4. Now enter the 'target word', i.e. the corrected pronunciation using the alphabets or the Pronunciation Symbol.
5. At any point of time, you can click 'Read Word' and listen to your pronunciation of the new word (target word). If not satisfied, you can edit the target word and listen to it once again.
6. Once the word is ready with the new pronunciation, just click 'File Save' and the new word along with its pronunciation is saved. It will be used by the particular speech Agent inside Captivate.

To use the the new pronunciation inside Captivate, just use the 'original word' and convert 'text to speech'. The newly created pronunciation will be used and audio file will be created. A captivate movie describing these steps is attached below (turn up your speaker volume).

Do try this functionality which allows you to create much more personalized and natural speeches. Please share your experiences and observations with us.

 

March 10, 2009

Learn Adobe Captivate 4

,

Here comes first book on Adobe Captivate 4 - Essentials of Adobe Captivate 4 which is a part of series of two books, second being Adobe Captivate 4: Beyond the Essentials. Read the announcement here.

It starts with a bird's eye view of planning eLearning projects, the process involved in it and time/ budgetary considerations and prepares you for what to expect from your authoring tool- all in simple and jargon free terms. It further deals with how to use the tool for recording, editing and distributing the project. These are well explained using actual screen shots. It also has few practical tips like how to reuse your demonstration projects to create assessment projects. This takes you through all the basic aspects of creating a good course. Once done with this you are ready to explore more advanced features. The second book covers exactly this.

The author Kevin A. Siegel is also into Adobe Captivate online training.


March 2, 2009

Captivate 4 Webinar- This Friday

,,

RJ, our eLearning evangelist, will be conducting a live eLearning session on 'Getting started with the new features in Adobe Captivate 4'. The session will provide you good working knowledge on the new features in Captivate 4 like Templates, Text-to-Speech, SWF Reviewer, Variables and Scripting, Widgets, TOC, Aggregator, new publish options, PSD import and more. RJ's sessions are always packed with information and very interactive; hence they also tend to get filled very early. So if you've just purchased Captivate 4 or the Adobe eLearning Suite, or are testing out the trial, you should plan to attend this session.

To quote RJ: "... no registration is required, but please keep in mind that my Connect Pro room only handles 400 people, so please log in as early as 30 minutes before the start time and the Virtual Classroom doors will close promptly at 10am PST to avoid distractions."

When: Friday, March 6, 2009 at 10:00am - 12.00 Noon Pacific Time

Where: http://my.adobe.acrobat.com/adobelearningsolutions/

Login instructions: Please click the link above as early as 30 minutes before the start time, enter as Guest, type your Full Name and click Enter Room. 

You can find more information on this session here.

January 21, 2009

Announcing eLearning Suite and Captivate 4!

,,

Today we announced the launch of Captivate 4 and the new Adobe eLearning Suite. While the sneak peaks at the Adobe Learning Summit and the eLearning Guild conference last November generated significant buzz around this big release, I truly believe we have two solid products that we can be bullish about. Close to 50 engineers worked for 18 months to build this product. This was beta tested for close to a year by more than 700 of your peers in the eLearning community.

The core focus of the two products is to drive productivity and efficiency in eLearning content authoring. Irrespective of wether you are involved in authoring rapid eLearning content, or comprehensive courseware, these products will meet your complete authoring needs. Captivate and Adobe Presenter form the anchor products for rapid eLearning. The integration between these products and the asset creation tools in the suite will help you generate richer eLearning content in a rapid authoring framework. Check out this video introducing the rapid authoring workflow in the eLearning Suite:

The eLearning Suite also contains enhanced versions of Flash Professional CS4 and Dreamweaver CS4- with specific eLearning extensions. These products form the anchor products for traditional courseware authoring. Shared tools like the SCORM Packager and the LMS adapter help streamline eLearning content creation using these powerful tools. Check out this video introducing the traditional authoring workflow in the eLearning suite:

For a more comprehensive introduction to the Adobe eLearning suite, check out this video RJ created.

In the next few days, to support the community in using these two products, we are converting this site to our team blog. We will discuss our personal favorites among this large set of features, and ways (not all documented) in which the community can maximize its benefits from the same. We hope this blog will provide a window for the large Captivate community to interact directly with the development team.


January 7, 2009

Captivate wins Best of eLearning!

,

OK, I did not stage this! When I made the post yesterday about the finalists, I had no idea that the awards were going to be announced the next day.

Adobe Captivate 3 has won the Best of eLearning! 2008 award for 'Best Simulation Tool'. Also, Adobe's Acrobat Connect Pro won the 'Best Virtual Classroom' award.

The combination should help streamline your eLearning course delivery. When the latest version of Connect Pro was released, we released a patch for Captivate (June 08) that ensures tight integration between the two products.

  • In a virtual classroom, presenters can allow participants to consume and interact with the Captivate course individually, and at their own pace. When required they can hit the sync button and bring all participants to the same page.
  • By default, Adobe Captivate projects are automatically published with a skin that contains an "Exit" button, which closes the window the content displays within. When loaded into a virtual classroom, this results in closing the classroom window. The exit button of a skin now deactivates smartly when loaded into Acrobat Connect Pro.
  • When publishing to Acrobat Connect Pro, Adobe Captivate saves you a few mouse-clicks and automatically turns on tracking for the Connect Training server.
  • Hotspot questions, a new question type introduced in Adobe Captivate 3, are now fully supported with Acrobat Connect Pro.

Sphere: Related Content

January 6, 2009

Best of eLearning! 2008 Finalists

,,

The finalists in various categories for the Best of eLearning! 2008 were announced during the eLearning Summit in November 08. In one of my earlier posts I had requested our users to vote for us in three categories. I'm happy to inform you that Adobe Captivate has been selected finalist in two of these categories- Best Simulation Tool, and Best Assessment Tool! Thank you for the votes and support! You can find the complete list here.

I'm still not sure when the actual winners will be announced... will keep you posted on that. On a side note, I attended the virtual eLearning Summit today. I think it is a pretty neat concept. You can do the same, and even attend the awards session by following this link.