Last week I got an email from an industry veteran, now working on analytics projects at a well-known agency. In it, he said, “I have a few clients who keep asking me to make sure that they’re not being overwhelmed by bots, given all the recent press about bot traffic being up to ⅓ to even ½ of web traffic.” Indeed, lately there have been a number of articles from respected publications covering the bot phenomenon, and its impact on web data, with one article reporting that up to 61.5% of all web traffic comes from bots. If more than half of your traffic comes from bots, who are neither human nor capable of becoming loyal customers, how can you trust your data at all? How can you confidently optimize your content or your marketing in this environment?
Most of the answer comes from the way the conclusions in articles like these are generated: based on Content Delivery Network (CDN) data. The purpose of a CDN is to receive requests for content from various entities (web browsers, mobile apps, bots, etc.) and quickly provide the requested content. As such, CDNs do not inherently require that the requesting entity meet technical requirements in order to receive whatever content has been requested. A CDN receives a request, serves it, and logs it. The analyses that we are seeing published are the result of these logs; the CDN looks at the raw user-agent strings and potentially other patterns across all requests and determines which requests came from bots and which did not. It is certainly possible than more than 50% of all traffic at the CDN level comes from bots.
My colleague, Bret Gundersen, recently did a small, cross-vertical study of bot traffic as a percentage of total page views over a month of data in report suites of various sizes. Here is a representative sample:
|Report Suite||Bots||Page Views||Percentage|
As Bret pointed out, “Bots are looking for content. Sites with fewer pages will see less bot traffic. The report suite with the highest bot traffic [in the table above] is a travel site that has thousands of hotels, flights, cruises, etc. When a CDN looks at bot traffic, they’re looking internet-wide, so they will see bots hit pages that people never hit, such as archived content. I’ve talked with publishers who have millions of archived pages, many of which get no visitor traffic each day.” In other words, because bots are indiscriminately crawling the entire Internet, their reported traffic data is massive due to bots hitting a far larger range of pages and content than humans hit. Perhaps a better way to put it is that, even if most bots were tracked in Adobe Analytics, bot traffic to pages and content that actually matter to you for analysis and optimization would be far lower than the numbers reported in these recent CDN-based studies.
Removing known bot traffic from Adobe Analytics
Within the Bot Rules screen, you have a few options:
The default bot filtering in Adobe Analytics is based on the IAB bot list, which is updated monthly and compiles its list from many sources, including CDNs and major internet properties. It includes thousands of known bots including all of your favorites: Google, Bing, Gomez, etc. This list covers the overwhelming majority of use cases and needs around bot filtration. If you want to use the IAB bot list, you can simply check the box shown above, click “Save,” and you are done.
In addition to (or in place of) the IAB bot list, you can also input or upload a list of bots to be filtered out of your data set. This list can be based on user-agent string (typically the easiest way to identify a bot at first glance) and/or IP address. For example, if you have an internally created bot that crawls your site to monitor uptime, you can enter the details for that bot in the setup tool and it will be filtered out of your data from that point forward.
In keeping with the findings referenced above, we have not seen massive drops in traffic when customers have turned on bot filtering. This is not because the filtering is not working (see the following section of this post), but rather it is because bot traffic did not represent a large percentage of measurable data to begin with.
What happens when I filter bots out of my data?
- Bots shows the various bots that were identified, such as “gomezagent” in the screen shot below, along with traffic data for each.
- Bot Pages shows the different pages that bots visited on your site.
Here is what the Bots report might look like:
Data in these reports is available from the time that you enable bot filtering; historical data prior to that time will not be available in these reports, and will continue to exist throughout your data. Detected bots are automatically excluded from segments, calculated metrics, etc.; they are indeed fully separated from your data set into the two reports listed above. Projects in Ad Hoc Analysis or dashboard in Report Builder will not include this bot data. If you publish an audience to the Adobe Marketing Cloud for analytics-powered targeting, it will also not include bots.
Don’t fear a robot uprising
I hope it is clear that, while robots are certainly part of the Internet ecosystem, they are nothing to be afraid of when it comes to your digital and customer analysis. The actual date in your report suites in Adobe Analytics should not be seeing more than a tiny percentage of their traffic from bots, and that traffic can easily be filtered out of reports and segments using Bot Rules in the Admin Console. Armed with an understanding of the cause of the massive bot numbers you may be seeing in articles around the web, and of how digital analytics measurement works, you are ready to push your analysis and marketing forward, without concern of a robot uprising to wreak havoc on your data.