If you’ve been fol­low­ing my blog­ging activ­i­ties in recent weeks, you should now have a good under­stand­ing of how you might imple­ment an auto­mated lead nur­tur­ing and response strategy.

I’ve walked you through cre­at­ing the per­fect lead nur­tur­ing email to recoup lost rev­enue for BtoC com­pa­nies and BtoB com­pa­nies. I’ve described in detail when, and how often, to con­tact leads. And I’ve talked about how to suc­cess­fully cre­ate a long-term strategy.

Now that you know exactly how a top-notch lead nur­tur­ing strat­egy is con­structed, I thought it would be inter­est­ing to share the results of a sur­vey that Insid​eSales​.com did in con­junc­tion with Omniture.

Insid​eSales​.com set up aliases, such as John@​xyzcompany.​com, and com­pleted the lead or request infor­ma­tion form of 700 dif­fer­ent com­pa­nies — rep­re­sen­ta­tive of the mar­ket — sev­eral dif­fer­ent times. Then kept track of their lead response and nur­tur­ing strate­gies and com­pared them to the strate­gies I’ve out­lined in recent weeks, to see how they stacked up.

How did they do?

  • Aver­age email response time: 19 hours, 31 min­utes
    *Opti­mum response time should be within the first hour
  • Aver­age phone response time: 36 hours, 57 min­utes
    *Opti­mum phone response time should be within the first five minutes
  • How many com­pa­nies even responded?
    *Only 47.3 per­cent responded via email, and just 7.5 per­cent responded via phone!

Out of the 700 com­pa­nies, there was an aver­age of just 3.3 con­tacts per com­pany. Only 4.6 per­cent used a strat­egy involv­ing both phone and email, and less than 5 per­cent called within 24 hours.

When you con­sider that a suc­cess­ful long-term lead response strat­egy begins with a phone call and email within the first 24 hours, that there should be an attempt to con­tact leads up to 26 times until you reach them in the first two weeks, that there should be at least one email a month — fol­lowed by a phone call — on an ongo­ing basis there­after, these com­pa­nies fell far, far short of the ideal.

Sim­ply stated, com­pa­nies across the board are des­per­ately lack­ing in nur­tur­ing those impor­tant and hard-to-come-by prospects. Your com­peti­tors are drop­ping the ball, leav­ing an oppor­tu­nity wide open for you to step up to the plate. By imple­ment­ing a lead nur­tur­ing strat­egy now, you can be miles ahead of your competition.

I chal­lenge you, today, to begin. Step up your efforts to reach a lead in the days fol­low­ing their first con­tact with you. See if you can attempt to con­tact prospects up to 26 times until you reach them (this can be done using tech­nol­ogy from com­pa­nies like Insid​eSales​.com that can mask caller ID so it doesn’t look like you’re being a pest).

So try it. I guar­an­tee your sales will improve — even as your com­peti­tors’ stagnate.

Tagged with →  
  • http://www.grokdotcom.com Bryan Eisen­berg

    Mikel,

    You are so right on and these stats are fright­en­ing for the state of our indus­try. Peo­ple seem to for­get that your com­peti­tor is just one click away and leads want to solve their prob­lem and get their answers NOW.

    Great post!
    Bryan

  • Pingback: Blogservatorio 19-09-2008 | El blog de Javier Godoy

  • http://www.insidesales.com/lead_nurturing.php Darin

    Thank you for shar­ing those results. We’ve found that the hang up in many com­pa­nies is that they focus too much on the per­fect lead nur­tur­ing mes­sages that they never get around to imple­ment­ing imme­di­ate responses. The sim­pler is bet­ter in most cases any­way. Don’t let paral­y­sis of analy­sis get the bet­ter of you.

    Also, inter­net leads are not like wine or cheese. They don’t need aging. They need to be con­tacted immediately.

  • http://www.insidesales.com Joao

    It’s true, I really does make a dif­fer­ence. I think many peo­ple know they should be con­tact­ing their leads faster but they don’t know how big of a dif­fer­ence it makes.
    lead response management

  • Ray Jones

    The response times are puz­zling. If you have an auto­mated sys­tem in place, won’t it send an email right away? I can’t think of a rea­son why a sys­tem would wait. So what is going on? Appar­ently, email response requires some human inter­ven­tion, i.e., some­one decid­ing to respond, which makes absolutely no sense in response to a form. Am I miss­ing some­thing here?

  • http://blogs.omniture.com/author/mchertudi Mikel Cher­tudi

    Ray,

    Great ques­tion – let me to clar­ify. The strat­egy for top leads (based on implicit and explicit scor­ing) is the fol­low­ing: first, sev­eral attempts to call the lead within 5 min­utes for the next few hours using an auto-dialing tech­nol­ogy (if no auto dialer is deployed, then man­ual dials). If a con­ver­sa­tion is not suc­cess­ful, then leave a mes­sage. The auto-email would go out after a 2–3 hours time period of some­one com­plet­ing the lead form, which leaves enough time for the more-important con­ver­sa­tion to take place. If the call is suc­cess­ful, then the per­son fol­low­ing up on the lead could flag the con­tact within the CRM/SFA/ or automa­tion sys­tem that would sus­pend the first auto­mated email and remain­ing response/nurturing pro­gram. Hope­fully this is more clear – let me know if I can fur­ther explain.

  • Pingback: New Sales = Fast Lead Follow-up - Upright Communications

  • Pingback: 5 Steps to Increase “Qualified” Leads From Your Website

  • Pingback: Sales Lead Insight: How Lead Response Time Impacts Sales - B2B Sales

  • Pingback: ¿Cómo mejorar el tiempo de respuesta a clientes? « Igni | Creación de demanda

  • Pingback: Garage Door Openers

  • Pingback: Data Shows Why Your Lead Generation Campaigns Are Not Working | Leads and Appointments | B2B Sales Leads , B2B Appointments, Business Sales Leads