Our pur­chase deci­sions are strongly influ­enced by what our friends like and rec­om­mend. The research to prove this out is avail­able in droves. The influ­ence that friends have on our pur­chase deci­sions is one of the pri­mary attrac­tion points for Facebook’s Spon­sored Story ads — ads that derive con­tent directly from friends’ inter­ac­tions with a brand’s Face­book pres­ence (page, app, place, domain). 

Facebook’s new Spon­sored Story adver­tise­ments promise enhanced influ­ence via the explicit endorse­ment of friends. But do they deliver? As we ana­lyzed pre­lim­i­nary adver­tiser data from Spon­sored Story ads, we felt val­i­dated by some of the results but were sur­prised by some others.

Spon­sored Story ads vs. Con­ven­tional Object Ads

Image1 FINAL
When we looked at the Spon­sored Story and object ad data for a set of our clients over a period of four weeks, we found that Spon­sored Story ads had a 39% lower CTR (click through rate) than object ads. At first glance, this is coun­ter­in­tu­itive (and sur­pris­ing). We expected users to respond with greater propen­sity to ads for brands that their friends liked. Hence, intu­itively CTRs should be higher for spon­sored story ads and not lower. A deeper look at the data unveiled the rea­sons for lower CTRs.

When we looked at unique CTRs, the Spon­sored Story CTRs were 3.4 times that of object ads. In other words, CTRs on Spon­sored Sto­ries appear lower because the same users have been ad served many more times in the time period. This is fur­ther val­i­dated when we look at the aver­age impres­sions per user. The Spon­sored Story ads were ad served more than 10 times that of their object ad counterparts. 

Finally, and most impor­tantly, we were able to drive a 22% lower Cost per Acqui­si­tion on Spon­sored Story ads vs. object ads in this time period.

Spon­sored Story vs. Object Ads: Key Met­ric Share

How much incre­men­tal vol­ume can adver­tis­ers drive from Spon­sored Story ads eco­nom­i­cally? As we opti­mized Face­book cam­paigns of our clients on both ad for­mats, we found that we could drive about 33% of con­ver­sions from Spon­sored Story ads spend­ing 28% of our total bud­get. What’s more, the impres­sion share and click share were 49% and 25% respec­tively. Thus Spon­sored Story ads are an eco­nom­i­cal way to gain impres­sion share while at the same time an easy way for adver­tis­ers to scale their con­ver­sion vol­ume by about 30%.

Image2 FINAL
 
Should you adver­tise in the Spon­sored Story format?

We are opti­mistic about Spon­sored Story ads. Our enthu­si­asm is echoed by Face­book, which recently unveiled three new Spon­sored Story for­mats, bring­ing the total to seven. Adver­tis­ers would be well advised to try Spon­sored Story ads to lever­age its three key benefits:

(1)   It’s an eco­nom­i­cal way to scale Face­book campaigns.

(2)   It’s an easy way of gain­ing impres­sions on the Face­book platform.

(3)   It’s a great way to lever­age the explicit endorse­ment of a “like.”

Dr. Sid­dharth Shah
Sr. Direc­tor, Busi­ness Analytics