<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 64 Bit: The best $300 (or less!) you can spend this year?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.adobe.com/genesisproject/2009/03/64_bit_the_best_300_or_less_yo.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/genesisproject/2009/03/64_bit_the_best_300_or_less_yo.html</link>
	<description>A blog for beginners in the creative space. Beginner to intermediate tips, tricks and tutorials on several Adobe products, especially After Effects, Premiere Pro and Photoshop. Who knows what else!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:23:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Marques</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/genesisproject/2009/03/64_bit_the_best_300_or_less_yo.html#comment-651</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Marques</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/genesisprojectdev/2009/03/64_bit_the_best_300_or_less_yo.html#comment-651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been running CS4 Master Collection on a Q6600 (Core 2 Quad) with 8GB RAM on Windows 7 Beta and it is very fast. CS4 works fine on Windows 7 Beta despite some GUI bugs.

[DR - great news.  Obviously, I am not advocating everyone run out and try the Windows 7 beta, but early indications are that Windows 7 will be a winner OS and that is good news for content creators everywhere.  Thanks for the input and comments Nick.]
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been running CS4 Master Collection on a Q6600 (Core 2 Quad) with 8GB RAM on Windows 7 Beta and it is very fast. CS4 works fine on Windows 7 Beta despite some GUI bugs.</p>
<p>[DR - great news.  Obviously, I am not advocating everyone run out and try the Windows 7 beta, but early indications are that Windows 7 will be a winner OS and that is good news for content creators everywhere.  Thanks for the input and comments Nick.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Topher Welsh</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/genesisproject/2009/03/64_bit_the_best_300_or_less_yo.html#comment-650</link>
		<dc:creator>Topher Welsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/genesisprojectdev/2009/03/64_bit_the_best_300_or_less_yo.html#comment-650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree... it is cheap to go that route, but if I am gonna make an upgrade, buy new RAM and all that... i am going to wait until I can upgrade my motherboard to a Dual Quad Core processor motherboard.

[DR - Hi Topher, thanks for your comments.  I think you miss the essence of what I&#039;m saying.  I&#039;m making an assumption that you have a decent computer or better and that we&#039;re all looking for an inexpensive way to really improve our performance out of Adobe CS4.  To that end, $300 will deliver that.  If you take a new mobo, new CPU&#039;s, etc., you&#039;re basically buying a new system.  Would that be better - you bet! My point though is that a few $$$ can go a long way in improving performance for CS4.

Check out Topher&#039;s tutorials BTW...]
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree&#8230; it is cheap to go that route, but if I am gonna make an upgrade, buy new RAM and all that&#8230; i am going to wait until I can upgrade my motherboard to a Dual Quad Core processor motherboard.</p>
<p>[DR - Hi Topher, thanks for your comments.  I think you miss the essence of what I'm saying.  I'm making an assumption that you have a decent computer or better and that we're all looking for an inexpensive way to really improve our performance out of Adobe CS4.  To that end, $300 will deliver that.  If you take a new mobo, new CPU's, etc., you're basically buying a new system.  Would that be better - you bet! My point though is that a few $$$ can go a long way in improving performance for CS4.</p>
<p>Check out Topher's tutorials BTW...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/genesisproject/2009/03/64_bit_the_best_300_or_less_yo.html#comment-649</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/genesisprojectdev/2009/03/64_bit_the_best_300_or_less_yo.html#comment-649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very interesting. I still have 32-bit Vista on my desktop and would love to upgrade. One of the things that have been holding me back is a worry about hardware compatibility. I admit that I haven&#039;t spent the time to make sure my video card, processor, etc. are compatible, but just the possibility seems to be a barrier to entry for me.

I have a 2 or 3 year old computer and at this point it seems worthwhile to put that $300 toward a new computer that would sport a quad-core (instead of dual-core) processor.

As usual, food for thought, though.

Thanks!
Brian

[DR - Brian, you bring up a very good point in terms of hardware support.  It does require a little bit of research, but I think that&#039;s a fairly straightforward process and it seems that MOST (but not all) hardware is compatible for Vista.

To me though, the benefits are worth the investment in time (and possibly $300).  Thanks for your comment.]
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting. I still have 32-bit Vista on my desktop and would love to upgrade. One of the things that have been holding me back is a worry about hardware compatibility. I admit that I haven&#8217;t spent the time to make sure my video card, processor, etc. are compatible, but just the possibility seems to be a barrier to entry for me.</p>
<p>I have a 2 or 3 year old computer and at this point it seems worthwhile to put that $300 toward a new computer that would sport a quad-core (instead of dual-core) processor.</p>
<p>As usual, food for thought, though.</p>
<p>Thanks!<br />
Brian</p>
<p>[DR - Brian, you bring up a very good point in terms of hardware support.  It does require a little bit of research, but I think that's a fairly straightforward process and it seems that MOST (but not all) hardware is compatible for Vista.</p>
<p>To me though, the benefits are worth the investment in time (and possibly $300).  Thanks for your comment.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
