This seems a clear case of confusing the sizzle with the steak, the map with the territory: “SproutCore is pretty impressive for building real JS web applications, although the story doesn’t real end there. There’s a convergence of other improvements, such as HTML5, CSS, and SVG, that are filling a lot of the multimedia roles previously the domain of flash. For example, WebKit already supports CSS transforms, gradients, client-side database storage, animation, HTML5 media, downloadable fonts, masks, reflections, etc.” Just because the paper map is flat, does not mean the territory has no hills. Your labels are just a model, and it’s more useful to look at what you can actually do, with which near-term and long-term costs. SVG theory and practice differ.
There were some references to traffic/revenue strategies from commercial bloggers, and charges of sockpuppetry. There’s some (apparent) engagement by a principal, but no resolution… more ad hominem than ad rem.
I got foiled by an Ajax text editor stripping out linebreaks (maybe it wanted paragraph tags?). Text should be simpler…. 😉 [Later: I got modded down to 0 and marked as “Troll”!]
Some reality: “I’m with you all the way as far as preferring standards over proprietary stuff. However, the iPhone seems like a bad example to me. It’s a proprietary platform, controlled by Apple.”
A common slam: “Still think Flash isn’t all that proprietary? Try selling a competing editor or changing the spec.” If the speaker would look around, the speaker would see that lots of people sell tooling atop the Flash platform, servers atop the Flash platform. Same with the PDF platform. I would agree that the governance of SWF is still within Adobe, rather than released to ISO as PDF recently was, but it’s a lot more approachable than the governance of iPhone. I’d prefer a face-to-face meeting with such a speaker, before guessing whether they’re aware of the mismatch between their speech and reality.
I haven’t personally confirmed this report, but it shows why every Ajax app has a responsibility to disclose on which specific runtimes they test, and which of those runtimes they recommend, and on which runtimes they’re just plain inaccessible: “The photo gallery [sproutcore.com] demo on SproutCore.com fails to work on Opera – the right photo pane not even rendering. Although Opera isn’t widely used, with its exceptional standards-compliance it’s a great barometer for how compatible something may ultimately be.” Followup: “It doesn’t seem to work quite properly on Camino, either…”
I think this may be a little harsh: “Web 2.0 exists because you don’t have to code your apps for each and every device separately. This is not the case with iPhone – anything not specifically built for iPhone is just awkward to use.” (A lot of browser apps are awkward, on a lot of devices… it’s still early days, we’ve got to improve design portability. OS-specific coding is a separate issue.)
A good example of the reaction to learning new conventions for a limited audience: “I [worked a lot of languages and environments but] never bothered to get deep into Objective C, because while it’s theoretically transferrable, it is really just used to write for the Apple Carbon/Cocoa/Core/Whatever/Don’tNitPickItsJustAnExample* stack. Same went for DirectX on Windows when I still wrote software for Windows. I would like to make apps that do whizzy things with Core Animation or whatever, but I just can’t make myself get excited at the prospect of learning yet another vendor-lockin technology.”
Oddly, Google has few relevant hits on the front page for “webobjects coldfusion”… much of the SproutCore evangelism today seemed like it would have worked for WebObjects as well.