<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flash video goes high-def</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2007/08/flash_video_goes_high_def.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2007/08/flash_video_goes_high_def.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:05:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grover</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2007/08/flash_video_goes_high_def.html#comment-4735</link>
		<dc:creator>Grover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 06:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2007/08/flash-video-goes-high-def.html#comment-4735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t understand why everyone is characterizing this as an advance in video quality. VP6 is an excellent codec, on par or sometimes even better than H.264. I&#039;m delighted at the news because it makes H.264 encoded .mp4 files essentially a no-brainer as the go-to format, but VP6 has always had excellent effciency and perfectly capable of displaying HiDef resolutions.
&lt;i&gt;[I&#039;m not an expert in this field, but I think the excitement comes from the fact that the announcement really encompasses a variety of changes/improvements.  One of those is that the Flash Player is adopting greater and greater levels of hardware acceleration.  That&#039;s great for video, but over time I expect it to help all Flash authors &amp; viewers have smoother experiences.  --J.]&lt;/i&gt;
In fact, I wonder if this will be as big of a deal as everyone seems to think it is. VP6 has been more than up to the task of bringing Flash video up to the level of other formats, but most applications continue to use Spark-based video for the sake of compatibility despite the fact that the VP6 compatible flash plugin is already deployed as widely as one could dare to hope for. I hope I&#039;m wrong (I know we&#039;re going to jump on this nearly immediately) but since the user could generally care less since they won&#039;t see any real increase in quality, it seems like it might be awhile before this announcement really means anything.
On an only vaguely related note, will we be able to access .mp4 streams from QTSS from within Flash? That would make my day.
&lt;i&gt;[That I don&#039;t know.  --J.]&lt;/i&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand why everyone is characterizing this as an advance in video quality. VP6 is an excellent codec, on par or sometimes even better than H.264. I&#8217;m delighted at the news because it makes H.264 encoded .mp4 files essentially a no-brainer as the go-to format, but VP6 has always had excellent effciency and perfectly capable of displaying HiDef resolutions.<br />
<i>[I'm not an expert in this field, but I think the excitement comes from the fact that the announcement really encompasses a variety of changes/improvements.  One of those is that the Flash Player is adopting greater and greater levels of hardware acceleration.  That's great for video, but over time I expect it to help all Flash authors &amp; viewers have smoother experiences.  --J.]</i><br />
In fact, I wonder if this will be as big of a deal as everyone seems to think it is. VP6 has been more than up to the task of bringing Flash video up to the level of other formats, but most applications continue to use Spark-based video for the sake of compatibility despite the fact that the VP6 compatible flash plugin is already deployed as widely as one could dare to hope for. I hope I&#8217;m wrong (I know we&#8217;re going to jump on this nearly immediately) but since the user could generally care less since they won&#8217;t see any real increase in quality, it seems like it might be awhile before this announcement really means anything.<br />
On an only vaguely related note, will we be able to access .mp4 streams from QTSS from within Flash? That would make my day.<br />
<i>[That I don't know.  --J.]</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevin weil</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2007/08/flash_video_goes_high_def.html#comment-4734</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin weil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2007/08/flash-video-goes-high-def.html#comment-4734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All i want is flash for my iPhone (and a way to turn it off when I dont!)
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All i want is flash for my iPhone (and a way to turn it off when I dont!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stef</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2007/08/flash_video_goes_high_def.html#comment-4733</link>
		<dc:creator>stef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 07:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2007/08/flash-video-goes-high-def.html#comment-4733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[and all these capabilities in less than 100k, across 3 major platforms (mac, pc and linux). that is the real marvel. ion needs to realize that player size, cross-platform is crucial.    this requires careful consideration and extensive testing. stef
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and all these capabilities in less than 100k, across 3 major platforms (mac, pc and linux). that is the real marvel. ion needs to realize that player size, cross-platform is crucial.    this requires careful consideration and extensive testing. stef</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ion gion</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2007/08/flash_video_goes_high_def.html#comment-4732</link>
		<dc:creator>ion gion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 00:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2007/08/flash-video-goes-high-def.html#comment-4732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Indeed this is great news. You now see how big clients influence Adobe less than we do, if it wasn&#039;t for apple and their youtube deals the chances for the flash player to get this would have been extremely small.
Like if it is not the designers/developers who gave flash its current spread. When would the flash player add a new realtime audio encoding codec without any licensing issues, to make us free from the pain of nellyhorse-sh** or when would we benefit from 2d/3d graphics acceleration in it ?!?
Well, these things are appearing in competition technologies like Silverlight and JavaFX, and as soon there would be some really designer friendly authoring tools for them, you will start seeing mases moving.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed this is great news. You now see how big clients influence Adobe less than we do, if it wasn&#8217;t for apple and their youtube deals the chances for the flash player to get this would have been extremely small.<br />
Like if it is not the designers/developers who gave flash its current spread. When would the flash player add a new realtime audio encoding codec without any licensing issues, to make us free from the pain of nellyhorse-sh** or when would we benefit from 2d/3d graphics acceleration in it ?!?<br />
Well, these things are appearing in competition technologies like Silverlight and JavaFX, and as soon there would be some really designer friendly authoring tools for them, you will start seeing mases moving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
