<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Adobe Magazine available</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/02/new_adobe_magazine_available_2.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/02/new_adobe_magazine_available_2.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 04:13:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/02/new_adobe_magazine_available_2.html#comment-6883</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 05:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2008/02/new-adobe-magazine-available-2.html#comment-6883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John - I just popped online after thinking &quot;I haven&#039;t gotten a recent issue of Adobe Magazine&quot; - a to my great dismay, I discover the magazine is no longer available.
Any insight into why it was killed? As a PDF evangelist, it was a wonderful tool for demonstrating the potential of the digital magazine format as well as an inspiration for new ways to use the tools.
I find it sad that Adobe has chosen to discontinue the creation of the magazine.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John &#8211; I just popped online after thinking &#8220;I haven&#8217;t gotten a recent issue of Adobe Magazine&#8221; &#8211; a to my great dismay, I discover the magazine is no longer available.<br />
Any insight into why it was killed? As a PDF evangelist, it was a wonderful tool for demonstrating the potential of the digital magazine format as well as an inspiration for new ways to use the tools.<br />
I find it sad that Adobe has chosen to discontinue the creation of the magazine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jknef</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/02/new_adobe_magazine_available_2.html#comment-6882</link>
		<dc:creator>jknef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2008/02/new-adobe-magazine-available-2.html#comment-6882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I need to make  11x17 brochures using text and digital high resolution professional photos on a regular basis.  Sorry to ask a dumb question here..what software would you recommend?  I have windows Vista and a mac pro one version before leopard.  Thanks
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need to make  11&#215;17 brochures using text and digital high resolution professional photos on a regular basis.  Sorry to ask a dumb question here..what software would you recommend?  I have windows Vista and a mac pro one version before leopard.  Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg h</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/02/new_adobe_magazine_available_2.html#comment-6881</link>
		<dc:creator>greg h</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2008/02/new-adobe-magazine-available-2.html#comment-6881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi John,
Thank you for the heads up that the new issue was available for download.
Just curious, any idea why the download is a zip?  A zip with just one file.  And the file is a PDF.
&lt;i&gt;[I&#039;m guessing (as I have no inside scoop) that the purpose is to make the file download rather than open inside one&#039;s browser.  On my machine at least the ZIP file wrapper away automatically.  --J.]&lt;/i&gt;
We are Adobe, so I would think we would be promoting the PDF format.  ZIP&#039;ing it seems odd. (And I would not zip a PDF in a similar case on any web site that I am webmaster on.)
Following are the files sizes:
ZIP 11,047,703
PDF 12,474,150
Difference:  1,426,447
So the ZIP is 11.5% smaller.  But the whole unzipping process makes it about 300% more of a hassle.
In a case like this, I would just rather direct access to the PDF.
Thanks again,
g
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,<br />
Thank you for the heads up that the new issue was available for download.<br />
Just curious, any idea why the download is a zip?  A zip with just one file.  And the file is a PDF.<br />
<i>[I'm guessing (as I have no inside scoop) that the purpose is to make the file download rather than open inside one's browser.  On my machine at least the ZIP file wrapper away automatically.  --J.]</i><br />
We are Adobe, so I would think we would be promoting the PDF format.  ZIP&#8217;ing it seems odd. (And I would not zip a PDF in a similar case on any web site that I am webmaster on.)<br />
Following are the files sizes:<br />
ZIP 11,047,703<br />
PDF 12,474,150<br />
Difference:  1,426,447<br />
So the ZIP is 11.5% smaller.  But the whole unzipping process makes it about 300% more of a hassle.<br />
In a case like this, I would just rather direct access to the PDF.<br />
Thanks again,<br />
g</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
