<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interested in testing the next Adobe Bridge?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/05/interested_in_testing_the_next_adobe_bridg.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/05/interested_in_testing_the_next_adobe_bridg.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 02:34:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Dinella</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/05/interested_in_testing_the_next_adobe_bridg.html#comment-8000</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Dinella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 06:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2008/05/interested-in-testing-the-next-adobe-bridge.html#comment-8000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hope you get it right this time. My CS3 Bridge is dead in the water (I&#039;ve talked to 2 Adobe technicians, so please don&#039;t refer anymore)
Suggest you look at your own Lightroom, Nikon NiewNX, and Faststone Image viewer 3.5 for ideas. These programs work great and don&#039;t crash or die on you. Or make a Bridge version just for photographers and try not to be all things to all people/programs. That&#039;s your mistake: too complex with Mr. Murphy (of Murphy&#039;s law) waiting for you. Lightroom is a great &quot;Bridge&quot;...so, why not clone it?
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hope you get it right this time. My CS3 Bridge is dead in the water (I&#8217;ve talked to 2 Adobe technicians, so please don&#8217;t refer anymore)<br />
Suggest you look at your own Lightroom, Nikon NiewNX, and Faststone Image viewer 3.5 for ideas. These programs work great and don&#8217;t crash or die on you. Or make a Bridge version just for photographers and try not to be all things to all people/programs. That&#8217;s your mistake: too complex with Mr. Murphy (of Murphy&#8217;s law) waiting for you. Lightroom is a great &#8220;Bridge&#8221;&#8230;so, why not clone it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: imajez</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/05/interested_in_testing_the_next_adobe_bridg.html#comment-7999</link>
		<dc:creator>imajez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 18:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2008/05/interested-in-testing-the-next-adobe-bridge.html#comment-7999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scott Kelby has a suggestion for future versions of Adobe Products that you may want to comment on.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1418#comment-61760&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1418#comment-61760&lt;/a&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott Kelby has a suggestion for future versions of Adobe Products that you may want to comment on.<br />
<a href="http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1418#comment-61760" rel="nofollow">http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/1418#comment-61760</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramón G Castañeda</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/05/interested_in_testing_the_next_adobe_bridg.html#comment-7998</link>
		<dc:creator>Ramón G Castañeda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 17:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2008/05/interested-in-testing-the-next-adobe-bridge.html#comment-7998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A post of mine left in the thread where Julie Manly made the public announcement received no response.  So here&#039;s my question again: by &quot;next Adobe Bridge&quot; is the version that will ship with CS4 meant?
If so, do we lose all hope for a fix to Bridge 2.1.1.9?
(Relax, Vishal and Mr. Nack, I don&#039;t intend to apply for the prerelease program.  :) )
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A post of mine left in the thread where Julie Manly made the public announcement received no response.  So here&#8217;s my question again: by &#8220;next Adobe Bridge&#8221; is the version that will ship with CS4 meant?<br />
If so, do we lose all hope for a fix to Bridge 2.1.1.9?<br />
(Relax, Vishal and Mr. Nack, I don&#8217;t intend to apply for the prerelease program.  :) )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/05/interested_in_testing_the_next_adobe_bridg.html#comment-7997</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 09:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2008/05/interested-in-testing-the-next-adobe-bridge.html#comment-7997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for providing this help
I signed up
Ken in KY
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for providing this help<br />
I signed up<br />
Ken in KY</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/05/interested_in_testing_the_next_adobe_bridg.html#comment-7996</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 06:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2008/05/interested-in-testing-the-next-adobe-bridge.html#comment-7996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great tip, thanks John! I use Bridge frequently in a number of roles. I just signed up.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great tip, thanks John! I use Bridge frequently in a number of roles. I just signed up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
