<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Type as illustrations &amp; more</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/06/type_as_illustrations_more.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/06/type_as_illustrations_more.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:26:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Navarro Parker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/06/type_as_illustrations_more.html#comment-8394</link>
		<dc:creator>Navarro Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2008/06/type-as-illustrations-more.html#comment-8394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PathStyler is great. Very similar to ArtText. Terrific bevel and texture tool for type. Both are very reminiscent of the ol&#039; KPT 5 ShapeShifter.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PathStyler is great. Very similar to ArtText. Terrific bevel and texture tool for type. Both are very reminiscent of the ol&#8217; KPT 5 ShapeShifter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason The Saj</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/06/type_as_illustrations_more.html#comment-8393</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason The Saj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2008/06/type-as-illustrations-more.html#comment-8393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, I was thinking about a future Adobe purchase. And realized - Adobe is missing the game BIG TIME!
You see, I would like to buy Lightroom. But I see no purpose in buying Lightroom 1.x when 2.0 is just on the horizon.
And the last thing Adobe wants is for me to jump ship to Aperture in the meantime. Though this is unlikely as I still use PC at home. But it got me thinking.
***
Dear Adobe,
Please let me &quot;pre-buy&quot; Adobe Lightroom 2.0, and in the meantime, let me download Lightroom 1.x and use it until 2.0 is released.
I realized this is a brilliant strategy.  It would reduce the amount of churn lost to Apple&#039;s Aperture. While at the same time bringing more Adobe users into the Lightroom environment. In particular, those like me waiting for the 2.0 release.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, I was thinking about a future Adobe purchase. And realized &#8211; Adobe is missing the game BIG TIME!<br />
You see, I would like to buy Lightroom. But I see no purpose in buying Lightroom 1.x when 2.0 is just on the horizon.<br />
And the last thing Adobe wants is for me to jump ship to Aperture in the meantime. Though this is unlikely as I still use PC at home. But it got me thinking.<br />
***<br />
Dear Adobe,<br />
Please let me &#8220;pre-buy&#8221; Adobe Lightroom 2.0, and in the meantime, let me download Lightroom 1.x and use it until 2.0 is released.<br />
I realized this is a brilliant strategy.  It would reduce the amount of churn lost to Apple&#8217;s Aperture. While at the same time bringing more Adobe users into the Lightroom environment. In particular, those like me waiting for the 2.0 release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alessandro Rosa</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/06/type_as_illustrations_more.html#comment-8392</link>
		<dc:creator>Alessandro Rosa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 09:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2008/06/type-as-illustrations-more.html#comment-8392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi John,
Just a comment about the Adobe Photoshop Website. I am not seeing a link to the White Papers on any of the pages, be it the main page, the Design Lab, the Pro Photographers link, etc. Why do you guys have them so buried? The only reason I know the link for them is that I read it on your blog and bookmarked it.
You would think that you would want to have an easy to find link to articles written by John Paul Caponigro or Jeff Schewe, among others. Any chance someone can spend some time and create a tutorial page that links too all of these articles? Thanks.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,<br />
Just a comment about the Adobe Photoshop Website. I am not seeing a link to the White Papers on any of the pages, be it the main page, the Design Lab, the Pro Photographers link, etc. Why do you guys have them so buried? The only reason I know the link for them is that I read it on your blog and bookmarked it.<br />
You would think that you would want to have an easy to find link to articles written by John Paul Caponigro or Jeff Schewe, among others. Any chance someone can spend some time and create a tutorial page that links too all of these articles? Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
