<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Phil Clevenger on the Lightroom UI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/07/phil_clevenger_on_the_lightroom_ui.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/07/phil_clevenger_on_the_lightroom_ui.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 22:51:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erland Flaten</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/07/phil_clevenger_on_the_lightroom_ui.html#comment-8514</link>
		<dc:creator>Erland Flaten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2008/07/phil-clevenger-on-the-lightroom-ui.html#comment-8514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A detail in the inteface I would like to point out is that there is to many lines in the UI of Lightroom. To many lines to separate things that doesnt need separation.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A detail in the inteface I would like to point out is that there is to many lines in the UI of Lightroom. To many lines to separate things that doesnt need separation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/07/phil_clevenger_on_the_lightroom_ui.html#comment-8513</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 14:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2008/07/phil-clevenger-on-the-lightroom-ui.html#comment-8513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Come on Jeffrey Friedl, don&#039;t be like that. Let&#039;s make fun of your photos too while we are at it. Lightroom is not always for fixing bad photos. Actually, it&#039;s used more for many other reasons. But the UI should be suited for the user, not the person standing behind them watching. I would rather it be more like Photoshop and less like Bryce and Photoshop Express. I guess my pictures must suck since I don&#039;t like the UI.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on Jeffrey Friedl, don&#8217;t be like that. Let&#8217;s make fun of your photos too while we are at it. Lightroom is not always for fixing bad photos. Actually, it&#8217;s used more for many other reasons. But the UI should be suited for the user, not the person standing behind them watching. I would rather it be more like Photoshop and less like Bryce and Photoshop Express. I guess my pictures must suck since I don&#8217;t like the UI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Friedl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/07/phil_clevenger_on_the_lightroom_ui.html#comment-8512</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Friedl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 08:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2008/07/phil-clevenger-on-the-lightroom-ui.html#comment-8512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Uh, Jim, if you want the photos to be more of a focus than the pretty UI, take better photos.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh, Jim, if you want the photos to be more of a focus than the pretty UI, take better photos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimHere</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/07/phil_clevenger_on_the_lightroom_ui.html#comment-8511</link>
		<dc:creator>JimHere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 06:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2008/07/phil-clevenger-on-the-lightroom-ui.html#comment-8511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He worked on the Kai/Bryce stuff? I knew it!
I know I&#039;m the only poster who thinks LRs UI is like a silly video game, but this explains alot. If only the photos, not the (admittedly) pretty UI could be the focus. Instead we have an interface that would work on one of those CSI shows -- LR is the star, not the work displayed there.
I&#039;m a huge fan of sci-fi-ui, but not for real work. Luckily for him, most people love it.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He worked on the Kai/Bryce stuff? I knew it!<br />
I know I&#8217;m the only poster who thinks LRs UI is like a silly video game, but this explains alot. If only the photos, not the (admittedly) pretty UI could be the focus. Instead we have an interface that would work on one of those CSI shows &#8212; LR is the star, not the work displayed there.<br />
I&#8217;m a huge fan of sci-fi-ui, but not for real work. Luckily for him, most people love it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Nelson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/07/phil_clevenger_on_the_lightroom_ui.html#comment-8510</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 01:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2008/07/phil-clevenger-on-the-lightroom-ui.html#comment-8510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s hard to believe the same designer is behind both the infuriating Metacreations interfaces and the elegant Lightroom interface.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard to believe the same designer is behind both the infuriating Metacreations interfaces and the elegant Lightroom interface.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
