<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Dear After Effects&#8230;&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/09/dear_after_effects.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/09/dear_after_effects.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 14:04:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. Schmidt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/09/dear_after_effects.html#comment-9470</link>
		<dc:creator>T. Schmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 11:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2008/09/dear-after-effects.html#comment-9470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it&#039;s great to see how Adobe is reacting, they really see the benefit in this new way of communication between the customer and the developer. I also think that conctact through blogs helps to give customers the feeling that they&#039;re not being ignored or left alone (as the phone support does). It reduces the mistrust against such a big company that has just sucked up its biggest rival, even if it&#039;s just an illusion.
This also includes videos like Adobe TV that show that a certain feature is actually useful and how it can be used, contrary to the somewhat contrived live presentations, that seem to be mainly targeting inverstors and shareholders.
It&#039;s a good marketing strategy that helps both sides.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s great to see how Adobe is reacting, they really see the benefit in this new way of communication between the customer and the developer. I also think that conctact through blogs helps to give customers the feeling that they&#8217;re not being ignored or left alone (as the phone support does). It reduces the mistrust against such a big company that has just sucked up its biggest rival, even if it&#8217;s just an illusion.<br />
This also includes videos like Adobe TV that show that a certain feature is actually useful and how it can be used, contrary to the somewhat contrived live presentations, that seem to be mainly targeting inverstors and shareholders.<br />
It&#8217;s a good marketing strategy that helps both sides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jakub Sochacki</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/09/dear_after_effects.html#comment-9469</link>
		<dc:creator>Jakub Sochacki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 09:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2008/09/dear-after-effects.html#comment-9469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi John,
Some time ago you wrote that GPU support in Photoshop CS4 will work on any graphics card   with OpenGL 2.0 and Shader Model 3.0 but there is a lot of fuzz about nVidia and CUDA on the internet which confuses me a bit.
I&#039;m going to get a new card in near future and I&#039;m wondering if it&#039;s reasonable to choose nVidia because of CUDA. Kevin Goldsmith wrote on his blog that Photoshop CS4 is not using it, but is it going to change ? e.g. Are there plug-ins coming out that will support only nVidia GPU&#039;s ? Or maybe CS5 will favor them ?
Best regards
Jakub
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,<br />
Some time ago you wrote that GPU support in Photoshop CS4 will work on any graphics card   with OpenGL 2.0 and Shader Model 3.0 but there is a lot of fuzz about nVidia and CUDA on the internet which confuses me a bit.<br />
I&#8217;m going to get a new card in near future and I&#8217;m wondering if it&#8217;s reasonable to choose nVidia because of CUDA. Kevin Goldsmith wrote on his blog that Photoshop CS4 is not using it, but is it going to change ? e.g. Are there plug-ins coming out that will support only nVidia GPU&#8217;s ? Or maybe CS5 will favor them ?<br />
Best regards<br />
Jakub</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JTA</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/09/dear_after_effects.html#comment-9468</link>
		<dc:creator>JTA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 07:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2008/09/dear-after-effects.html#comment-9468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After Effects totally has the best team, that application is STREETS ahead of the other adobe apps and oceans ahead of the adopted macromedia apps.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After Effects totally has the best team, that application is STREETS ahead of the other adobe apps and oceans ahead of the adopted macromedia apps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saeed Ashour</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/09/dear_after_effects.html#comment-9467</link>
		<dc:creator>Saeed Ashour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 11:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2008/09/dear-after-effects.html#comment-9467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi john ...
May When your team will respond on Photoshop gripes?
&lt;i&gt;[Well, I do my best to address questions/comments that come up here.  If you&#039;ve got specifics in mind, please let me know.  --J.]&lt;/i&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi john &#8230;<br />
May When your team will respond on Photoshop gripes?<br />
<i>[Well, I do my best to address questions/comments that come up here.  If you've got specifics in mind, please let me know.  --J.]</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
