<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Olympic photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/09/olympic_photography.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/09/olympic_photography.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 21:27:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: photo retouching</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/09/olympic_photography.html#comment-9043</link>
		<dc:creator>photo retouching</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 00:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2008/09/olympic-photography.html#comment-9043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don`t want to get into the issues of ownership and branding, just say that this totally crap website has got its hand on some really nice pictures
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don`t want to get into the issues of ownership and branding, just say that this totally crap website has got its hand on some really nice pictures</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/09/olympic_photography.html#comment-9042</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2008/09/olympic-photography.html#comment-9042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even before I read the comments on the TotallyCrap site, I already had gone to see if the sources were in the EXIF.  Nope.  And a lot of people called them out for not only branding the images with their logo, the stripped the EXIF, too.  Very poor form.
D.
&lt;i&gt;[Totally crap indeed.  --J.]&lt;/i&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even before I read the comments on the TotallyCrap site, I already had gone to see if the sources were in the EXIF.  Nope.  And a lot of people called them out for not only branding the images with their logo, the stripped the EXIF, too.  Very poor form.<br />
D.<br />
<i>[Totally crap indeed.  --J.]</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Keefe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/09/olympic_photography.html#comment-9041</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Keefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 12:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2008/09/olympic-photography.html#comment-9041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting Olympic collection they have built, although I did notice from the comments they have taken them from another site, removed the copyright and stuck their own in place...
.. that being said, thanks for the links I hadn&#039;t seen this before
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting Olympic collection they have built, although I did notice from the comments they have taken them from another site, removed the copyright and stuck their own in place&#8230;<br />
.. that being said, thanks for the links I hadn&#8217;t seen this before</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/09/olympic_photography.html#comment-9040</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 12:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2008/09/olympic-photography.html#comment-9040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Watch out for the NSFW banner ads at the TotallyCrap site.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watch out for the NSFW banner ads at the TotallyCrap site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
