<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: InDesign + Flash goodness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/10/indesign_flash_goodness.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/10/indesign_flash_goodness.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 03:45:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Borsch</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/10/indesign_flash_goodness.html#comment-9770</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Borsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2008/10/indesign-flash-goodness.html#comment-9770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This ID to Flash capability is worth the upgrade (as is Flash rendering within PDF too).
Curious about something though: Why is it that Adobe isn&#039;t delivering &quot;Adobe TV in a box&quot;? It&#039;s a beautiful site, is laid out very well, and I&#039;d love it if there was a way to deploy &quot;MySite.tv&quot; like Adobe has with Adobe TV.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This ID to Flash capability is worth the upgrade (as is Flash rendering within PDF too).<br />
Curious about something though: Why is it that Adobe isn&#8217;t delivering &#8220;Adobe TV in a box&#8221;? It&#8217;s a beautiful site, is laid out very well, and I&#8217;d love it if there was a way to deploy &#8220;MySite.tv&#8221; like Adobe has with Adobe TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann Shelbourne</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/10/indesign_flash_goodness.html#comment-9769</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann Shelbourne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2008/10/indesign-flash-goodness.html#comment-9769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt;Flash Player 10 now supports basic color management&gt;
Yeah!!
THAT was quick!
Thank you so much for getting that done.
:)
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;Flash Player 10 now supports basic color management&gt;<br />
Yeah!!<br />
THAT was quick!<br />
Thank you so much for getting that done.<br />
:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimhere</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/10/indesign_flash_goodness.html#comment-9768</link>
		<dc:creator>jimhere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2008/10/indesign-flash-goodness.html#comment-9768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This sounds great. Just last version (CS3) the Adobe Marketing guys didn&#039;t even believe InDesign and Flash could ever work together (I had to buy the Master Collection because Fl and ID were in different &quot;suites&quot;).
Now it will be at least a little easier to turn slicks or brochures into little movies.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds great. Just last version (CS3) the Adobe Marketing guys didn&#8217;t even believe InDesign and Flash could ever work together (I had to buy the Master Collection because Fl and ID were in different &#8220;suites&#8221;).<br />
Now it will be at least a little easier to turn slicks or brochures into little movies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
