<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Housekeeping: CAPTCHA mechanism changed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/09/housekeeping_captcha_mechanism_changed.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/09/housekeeping_captcha_mechanism_changed.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:53:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agnes</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/09/housekeeping_captcha_mechanism_changed.html#comment-31529</link>
		<dc:creator>Agnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2011 00:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2009/09/housekeeping-captcha-mechanism-changed.html#comment-31529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello
 
Does Adobe provide any open source captcha solutions  which can be used from java/jsp?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello</p>
<p>Does Adobe provide any open source captcha solutions  which can be used from java/jsp?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jp Cooper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/09/housekeeping_captcha_mechanism_changed.html#comment-13946</link>
		<dc:creator>Jp Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 12:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2009/09/housekeeping-captcha-mechanism-changed.html#comment-13946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I must have missed the CAPTCHA mechanism.  I was posting back when you had us type in &#039;photoshop&#039; and now it&#039;s the sophisticated math problem I need a calculator for.
But all in all I like it better than the CAPTCHA stuff.  Never have liked that at all.
I find at times when I hit sites like that I&#039;ll refresh the page a dozen times before I find something legible to begin with that I know won&#039;t be rejected.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must have missed the CAPTCHA mechanism.  I was posting back when you had us type in &#8216;photoshop&#8217; and now it&#8217;s the sophisticated math problem I need a calculator for.<br />
But all in all I like it better than the CAPTCHA stuff.  Never have liked that at all.<br />
I find at times when I hit sites like that I&#8217;ll refresh the page a dozen times before I find something legible to begin with that I know won&#8217;t be rejected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/09/housekeeping_captcha_mechanism_changed.html#comment-13945</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 19:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2009/09/housekeeping-captcha-mechanism-changed.html#comment-13945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[haha... I like the question a lot more than the captcha.  I frequently find captchas to be hard to read.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha&#8230; I like the question a lot more than the captcha.  I frequently find captchas to be hard to read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/09/housekeeping_captcha_mechanism_changed.html#comment-13944</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 11:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2009/09/housekeeping-captcha-mechanism-changed.html#comment-13944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you expecting a numeral or the number spelled out?
&lt;i&gt;[Seems you guessed right. :-)  --J.]&lt;/i&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you expecting a numeral or the number spelled out?<br />
<i>[Seems you guessed right. :-)  --J.]</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clay</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/09/housekeeping_captcha_mechanism_changed.html#comment-13943</link>
		<dc:creator>Clay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2009/09/housekeeping-captcha-mechanism-changed.html#comment-13943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Geez.  I&#039;ve tried posting before.  I just thought you didn&#039;t like what I had to say.  Every time I had tried to post, even when I put in the correct answer, my posting was denied as SPAM.
If this works, I&#039;ll be surprised.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geez.  I&#8217;ve tried posting before.  I just thought you didn&#8217;t like what I had to say.  Every time I had tried to post, even when I put in the correct answer, my posting was denied as SPAM.<br />
If this works, I&#8217;ll be surprised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daemon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/09/housekeeping_captcha_mechanism_changed.html#comment-13942</link>
		<dc:creator>Daemon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2009/09/housekeeping-captcha-mechanism-changed.html#comment-13942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it&#039;s Four!
Also, why don&#039;t you guys switch to some better blogging engine?
Also #2, why the people at Adobe who really blog a lot, like you, don&#039;t get a REALLY good blog engine, maybe custom made? I know that it could be a corporate drama, but by the freedom-of-speech, couldn&#039;t you have your own blog? (I seriously do not know how is the corporate structure, and I do not know what your contract says :P )
&lt;i&gt;[Yeah, I don&#039;t really know, either.  For a long time the blogging infrastructure was run on an old Trash-80 powered by a half-dead hamster.  I&#039;m not kidding when I say it would take 5+ minutes for any change to appear on the live site.  I&#039;m just grateful to have gotten some nice upgrades in recent months.  --J.]&lt;/i&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s Four!<br />
Also, why don&#8217;t you guys switch to some better blogging engine?<br />
Also #2, why the people at Adobe who really blog a lot, like you, don&#8217;t get a REALLY good blog engine, maybe custom made? I know that it could be a corporate drama, but by the freedom-of-speech, couldn&#8217;t you have your own blog? (I seriously do not know how is the corporate structure, and I do not know what your contract says :P )<br />
<i>[Yeah, I don't really know, either.  For a long time the blogging infrastructure was run on an old Trash-80 powered by a half-dead hamster.  I'm not kidding when I say it would take 5+ minutes for any change to appear on the live site.  I'm just grateful to have gotten some nice upgrades in recent months.  --J.]</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/09/housekeeping_captcha_mechanism_changed.html#comment-13941</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 18:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2009/09/housekeeping-captcha-mechanism-changed.html#comment-13941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An issue about captcha I don&#039;t see discussed much is that it is very challenging for the aged and people with declining vision.
&lt;i&gt;[That&#039;s one reason I wanted to return to the system that you now see.  It relies on simple questions, not weird-looking lettering.  --J.]&lt;/i&gt;
My mother-in-law is an example. She&#039;s in her mid-70s. Captcha on Yahoo is a big challenge for her that causes her a lot of frustration.
I understand the reason for it. ;) I have several spammer attempts each day on my site. I don&#039;t use captcha. People have to register and then I have to review and unblock them. Their e-mail address has to be live.
&lt;i&gt;[Unfortunately, when you work for a big multi-national company, things like requiring user registration become much more complicated.  --J.]&lt;/i&gt;
This has kept the spammers off. But it&#039;s a hassle for me and -- more important -- it can be several hours until they get activated. (I have to sleep sometimes. LOL.) That can discourage people from participating.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An issue about captcha I don&#8217;t see discussed much is that it is very challenging for the aged and people with declining vision.<br />
<i>[That's one reason I wanted to return to the system that you now see.  It relies on simple questions, not weird-looking lettering.  --J.]</i><br />
My mother-in-law is an example. She&#8217;s in her mid-70s. Captcha on Yahoo is a big challenge for her that causes her a lot of frustration.<br />
I understand the reason for it. ;) I have several spammer attempts each day on my site. I don&#8217;t use captcha. People have to register and then I have to review and unblock them. Their e-mail address has to be live.<br />
<i>[Unfortunately, when you work for a big multi-national company, things like requiring user registration become much more complicated.  --J.]</i><br />
This has kept the spammers off. But it&#8217;s a hassle for me and &#8212; more important &#8212; it can be several hours until they get activated. (I have to sleep sometimes. LOL.) That can discourage people from participating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
