<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Demo: Illustrator + HTML5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2010/05/demo_illustrator_html5.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2010/05/demo_illustrator_html5.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:21:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DF</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2010/05/demo_illustrator_html5.html#comment-19221</link>
		<dc:creator>DF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 16:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2010/05/demo-illustrator-html5.html#comment-19221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;[Yes, it&#039;s always Adobe that&#039;s at fault--always. The browser vendors (mainly MSFT) failing to get their stuff together and offer robust SVG support is Adobe&#039;s fault. I love to hear people advocating whatever will reach that conclusion (e.g. we should have invested more in browser plug-ins; yet all browser plug-ins (and Adobe&#039;s in particular) suck; etc.). --J.]&lt;/i&gt;
Woah - slow down, there. I know that the Flash plugin is a touchy subject for you guys at Adobe right now, but I&#039;m not bringing it up in that context.
Now, as you haven&#039;t denied it here, I&#039;m presuming that you agree that SVG within Adobe died a death the minute Macromedia (and hence Flash) was bought. As someone whose workplaces&#039; intranet GIS systems depend on the unfinished beta Adobe SVG plugin from many years ago, I just happen to have awareness of the issue.
I look forward to considerable progress over the next couple of years, with hopefully all major browsers natively supporting SVG.
&lt;i&gt;[Thanks for the details, and here&#039;s hoping for widespread, consistent browser support.  --J.]&lt;/i&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>[Yes, it's always Adobe that's at fault--always. The browser vendors (mainly MSFT) failing to get their stuff together and offer robust SVG support is Adobe's fault. I love to hear people advocating whatever will reach that conclusion (e.g. we should have invested more in browser plug-ins; yet all browser plug-ins (and Adobe's in particular) suck; etc.). --J.]</i><br />
Woah &#8211; slow down, there. I know that the Flash plugin is a touchy subject for you guys at Adobe right now, but I&#8217;m not bringing it up in that context.<br />
Now, as you haven&#8217;t denied it here, I&#8217;m presuming that you agree that SVG within Adobe died a death the minute Macromedia (and hence Flash) was bought. As someone whose workplaces&#8217; intranet GIS systems depend on the unfinished beta Adobe SVG plugin from many years ago, I just happen to have awareness of the issue.<br />
I look forward to considerable progress over the next couple of years, with hopefully all major browsers natively supporting SVG.<br />
<i>[Thanks for the details, and here's hoping for widespread, consistent browser support.  --J.]</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip Kerman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2010/05/demo_illustrator_html5.html#comment-19220</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Kerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 10:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2010/05/demo-illustrator-html5.html#comment-19220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kevin&#039;s demo was brilliant--up until he showed that crazy thing using Illustrator &gt; SVG &gt; interactive/dynamic clock graphics.  So absurd.  Is Adobe serious that this is a workflow they&#039;re recommending, supporting, and hearing a demand for?  If so, I must live in a different world.
I found THAT PART of the demo absurd.
&lt;i&gt;[I&#039;m not an expert on The Right &amp; Modern Way to deliver such content, but given that Flash Player is obviously an evil, sulfurous, hell-spawned abomination, what *is* the WHATWG-sanctioned method for delivering interactive vector graphics online?  --J.]&lt;/i&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin&#8217;s demo was brilliant&#8211;up until he showed that crazy thing using Illustrator &gt; SVG &gt; interactive/dynamic clock graphics.  So absurd.  Is Adobe serious that this is a workflow they&#8217;re recommending, supporting, and hearing a demand for?  If so, I must live in a different world.<br />
I found THAT PART of the demo absurd.<br />
<i>[I'm not an expert on The Right &amp; Modern Way to deliver such content, but given that Flash Player is obviously an evil, sulfurous, hell-spawned abomination, what *is* the WHATWG-sanctioned method for delivering interactive vector graphics online?  --J.]</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2010/05/demo_illustrator_html5.html#comment-19219</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 02:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2010/05/demo-illustrator-html5.html#comment-19219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How un-userfriendly is that. Frankly, instead of triying to find the next shining feature for marketing purposes, you should really work on optimizing your software&#039;s UIs.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How un-userfriendly is that. Frankly, instead of triying to find the next shining feature for marketing purposes, you should really work on optimizing your software&#8217;s UIs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DF</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2010/05/demo_illustrator_html5.html#comment-19218</link>
		<dc:creator>DF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 21:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2010/05/demo-illustrator-html5.html#comment-19218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;I should hasten to note that although Illustrator has supported creation of interactive, open-standard SVG for 10 year&lt;/i&gt;
Given the complete abandonment by Adobe of the SVG plugin when you bought Flash, any lingering SVG support in Illustrator really doesn&#039;t earn you credit (and as you say yourself, better SVG support appears to be sitting on the same shelf that HTML5 was on. Bad karma, Adobe)
&lt;i&gt;[Yes, it&#039;s always Adobe that&#039;s at fault--always.  The browser vendors (mainly MSFT) failing to get their stuff together and offer robust SVG support is Adobe&#039;s fault.  I love to hear people advocating whatever will reach that conclusion (e.g. we should have invested more in browser plug-ins; yet all browser plug-ins (and Adobe&#039;s in particular) suck; etc.).  --J.]&lt;/i&gt;
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I should hasten to note that although Illustrator has supported creation of interactive, open-standard SVG for 10 year</i><br />
Given the complete abandonment by Adobe of the SVG plugin when you bought Flash, any lingering SVG support in Illustrator really doesn&#8217;t earn you credit (and as you say yourself, better SVG support appears to be sitting on the same shelf that HTML5 was on. Bad karma, Adobe)<br />
<i>[Yes, it's always Adobe that's at fault--always.  The browser vendors (mainly MSFT) failing to get their stuff together and offer robust SVG support is Adobe's fault.  I love to hear people advocating whatever will reach that conclusion (e.g. we should have invested more in browser plug-ins; yet all browser plug-ins (and Adobe's in particular) suck; etc.).  --J.]</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thinsoldier</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2010/05/demo_illustrator_html5.html#comment-19217</link>
		<dc:creator>thinsoldier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 10:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2010/05/demo-illustrator-html5.html#comment-19217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m a type of colorblind. I couldn&#039;t tell which were booked and which were free :(
Who chose that color scheme?
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a type of colorblind. I couldn&#8217;t tell which were booked and which were free :(<br />
Who chose that color scheme?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2010/05/demo_illustrator_html5.html#comment-19216</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 05:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnackdev/2010/05/demo-illustrator-html5.html#comment-19216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice one. Enjoying the HTML5/CSS3 Dreamweaver pack. Can&#039;t wait to see this sort of SVG/JS integration or canvas export from Illustrator.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one. Enjoying the HTML5/CSS3 Dreamweaver pack. Can&#8217;t wait to see this sort of SVG/JS integration or canvas export from Illustrator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
