<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lightroom 3.2, Camera Raw 6.2 arrive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2010/08/lightroom-3-2-camera-raw-6-2-arrive.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2010/08/lightroom-3-2-camera-raw-6-2-arrive.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 05:43:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avery Nelson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2010/08/lightroom-3-2-camera-raw-6-2-arrive.html#comment-24990</link>
		<dc:creator>Avery Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=2673#comment-24990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ditto on David Kenny&#039;s comment (for #2, but not #1 &amp; 3). The behavior of how &#039;Copy as DNG&#039; changed with the 3.2 update.

I keep a copy of the RAW files, incase I ever need the original raw file for submission, etc. Today I learned that my backed up, original, raw files were not renamed consistent with the DNG files, as they were prior to 3.2.

I have just submitted this as a bug report, and under Case #0181921889]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto on David Kenny&#8217;s comment (for #2, but not #1 &amp; 3). The behavior of how &#8216;Copy as DNG&#8217; changed with the 3.2 update.</p>
<p>I keep a copy of the RAW files, incase I ever need the original raw file for submission, etc. Today I learned that my backed up, original, raw files were not renamed consistent with the DNG files, as they were prior to 3.2.</p>
<p>I have just submitted this as a bug report, and under Case #0181921889</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Kenny</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2010/08/lightroom-3-2-camera-raw-6-2-arrive.html#comment-23262</link>
		<dc:creator>David Kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 15:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=2673#comment-23262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When IMPORT&#039;ing RAW (NEF) files using the Copy as DNG feature and Make a Second Copy To: feature, there is a discrepancy.  
The images for the 2nd copy are:
1.  Not converted to DNG,
2.  Not renamed, and
3.  Not placed is the specified folder.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When IMPORT&#8217;ing RAW (NEF) files using the Copy as DNG feature and Make a Second Copy To: feature, there is a discrepancy.<br />
The images for the 2nd copy are:<br />
1.  Not converted to DNG,<br />
2.  Not renamed, and<br />
3.  Not placed is the specified folder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Bruns</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2010/08/lightroom-3-2-camera-raw-6-2-arrive.html#comment-22494</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Bruns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=2673#comment-22494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unless I misunderstand something, distortion for the Nikon 18-200mm has also been updated.  But my concern is less about list accuracy and more about the &quot;automatic lens correction update&quot; itself.  I had perfectly aligned masks for hundreds of images but now when I open their Smart Objects, make and change and close, a new distortion correction is being applied, ie. the masks are not longer aligned.  This is a major headache and it&#039;s not clear how I might go back to the original lens profile.  Even if it is worse, I am already invested in it with the masks.  Pushing out this change without due notice or way to ensure backward compatibility is a major shortfall.  I would be interested to hear how Adobe recommends I proceed?  Revert to ACR 6.1 and miss out on all future updates?  I highly recommend building legacy profiles into future updates.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless I misunderstand something, distortion for the Nikon 18-200mm has also been updated.  But my concern is less about list accuracy and more about the &#8220;automatic lens correction update&#8221; itself.  I had perfectly aligned masks for hundreds of images but now when I open their Smart Objects, make and change and close, a new distortion correction is being applied, ie. the masks are not longer aligned.  This is a major headache and it&#8217;s not clear how I might go back to the original lens profile.  Even if it is worse, I am already invested in it with the masks.  Pushing out this change without due notice or way to ensure backward compatibility is a major shortfall.  I would be interested to hear how Adobe recommends I proceed?  Revert to ACR 6.1 and miss out on all future updates?  I highly recommend building legacy profiles into future updates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2010/08/lightroom-3-2-camera-raw-6-2-arrive.html#comment-22464</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 17:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=2673#comment-22464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there somewhere were we can find an up-to-date list of all the lens corrections in Camera Raw/Lightroom?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there somewhere were we can find an up-to-date list of all the lens corrections in Camera Raw/Lightroom?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Tranberry</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2010/08/lightroom-3-2-camera-raw-6-2-arrive.html#comment-22452</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Tranberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=2673#comment-22452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you tried resetting your prefs?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you tried resetting your prefs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Cuppy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2010/08/lightroom-3-2-camera-raw-6-2-arrive.html#comment-22451</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Cuppy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=2673#comment-22451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Installed all the updates now Photoshop hangs on launch, looks to be hanging on loading brushes.  Another days worth of work, down the drain. Anyone else out there having problems?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Installed all the updates now Photoshop hangs on launch, looks to be hanging on loading brushes.  Another days worth of work, down the drain. Anyone else out there having problems?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MartinDoersch</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2010/08/lightroom-3-2-camera-raw-6-2-arrive.html#comment-22449</link>
		<dc:creator>MartinDoersch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=2673#comment-22449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When will flickr &amp; facebook export come to the german version of bridge cs5? Would we soooo nice.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When will flickr &amp; facebook export come to the german version of bridge cs5? Would we soooo nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
