<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A candid look at Photoshop CS5 development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2011/03/a-candid-look-at-photoshop-cs5-development.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2011/03/a-candid-look-at-photoshop-cs5-development.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 21:15:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Bernstein</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2011/03/a-candid-look-at-photoshop-cs5-development.html#comment-33300</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Bernstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 17:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=3789#comment-33300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Given how sparse the support for &gt;8-bit is in the app, can we at least agree, it has a long way to go? If you would like, I can create a poll to ask all our clients which functions need &gt;8-bit in order to make it so they can flawlessly move to those modes.

&lt;i&gt;[Sure, Jeff--that would be helpful.  The point is, we don&#039;t want to do work just for appearance&#039;s sake.  We need to spend time working on features people would actually use, and the Venn diagram overlap between &quot;people who care about working in 16-bit&quot; and &quot;people who care about applying Plastic Wrap et al.&quot; is likely pretty tiny.  --J.]&lt;/i&gt; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given how sparse the support for &gt;8-bit is in the app, can we at least agree, it has a long way to go? If you would like, I can create a poll to ask all our clients which functions need &gt;8-bit in order to make it so they can flawlessly move to those modes.</p>
<p><i>[Sure, Jeff--that would be helpful.  The point is, we don't want to do work just for appearance's sake.  We need to spend time working on features people would actually use, and the Venn diagram overlap between "people who care about working in 16-bit" and "people who care about applying Plastic Wrap et al." is likely pretty tiny.  --J.]</i> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hendrik</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2011/03/a-candid-look-at-photoshop-cs5-development.html#comment-33291</link>
		<dc:creator>Hendrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 07:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=3789#comment-33291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great video. Wow, that sounds pretty stressful! 

I realize that this video focuses on the core Photoshop team only, but I think it still would have been nice to give explicit shout outs to the individual researchers inside and outside Adobe who actually came up with those killer features (like the content aware fill or the brush simulation). Because it certainly sounds like they too played  a pretty significant role in saving the day.

&lt;i&gt;[That&#039;s a great idea, and your suggestion has gotten a couple of folks talking.  --J.]&lt;/i&gt; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great video. Wow, that sounds pretty stressful! </p>
<p>I realize that this video focuses on the core Photoshop team only, but I think it still would have been nice to give explicit shout outs to the individual researchers inside and outside Adobe who actually came up with those killer features (like the content aware fill or the brush simulation). Because it certainly sounds like they too played  a pretty significant role in saving the day.</p>
<p><i>[That's a great idea, and your suggestion has gotten a couple of folks talking.  --J.]</i> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2011/03/a-candid-look-at-photoshop-cs5-development.html#comment-33265</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 20:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=3789#comment-33265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chris and/or John,

Can someone answer some questions about DNG for me and my agency? Here are a list of topics: 

-File transmission capabilities using FTP and FFT
-File size reduction ratio and examples
-SDK update
-JPEG to DNG improvements/development

Please email offline of this blog, if possible. Thank you. 

Cheers!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris and/or John,</p>
<p>Can someone answer some questions about DNG for me and my agency? Here are a list of topics: </p>
<p>-File transmission capabilities using FTP and FFT<br />
-File size reduction ratio and examples<br />
-SDK update<br />
-JPEG to DNG improvements/development</p>
<p>Please email offline of this blog, if possible. Thank you. </p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Cox</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2011/03/a-candid-look-at-photoshop-cs5-development.html#comment-33263</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Cox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 18:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=3789#comment-33263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rosyna - depends on what you want to talk about (ie: do we need an NDA?).  You could contact John or other product managers for marketing related stuff, or just email any of us engineers if you want to talk low level stuff that doesn&#039;t need an NDA.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rosyna &#8211; depends on what you want to talk about (ie: do we need an NDA?).  You could contact John or other product managers for marketing related stuff, or just email any of us engineers if you want to talk low level stuff that doesn&#8217;t need an NDA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Kosmicki</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2011/03/a-candid-look-at-photoshop-cs5-development.html#comment-33261</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Kosmicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=3789#comment-33261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Philipp,
I was the editor on the video. The transition was a way to cover a &quot;jump cut&quot; and it happens two or three times in the video. The effect was done very simply by dissolving to a pale yellow solid then back out. I used an &quot;add&quot; blending mode (know as &quot;linear dodge&quot; in Photoshop) on the solid. The whole transition takes 12 frames or a half-second (the video is 23.976fps). I edited the video using 32bpc color, so there is a subtle glowish look in the transition that can&#039;t be achieved in standard 8bpc.
The video was edited using Production Studio CS5.

&lt;i&gt;[Thanks, Jeff!  And thanks for the really nice production.  --J.]&lt;/i&gt; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Philipp,<br />
I was the editor on the video. The transition was a way to cover a &#8220;jump cut&#8221; and it happens two or three times in the video. The effect was done very simply by dissolving to a pale yellow solid then back out. I used an &#8220;add&#8221; blending mode (know as &#8220;linear dodge&#8221; in Photoshop) on the solid. The whole transition takes 12 frames or a half-second (the video is 23.976fps). I edited the video using 32bpc color, so there is a subtle glowish look in the transition that can&#8217;t be achieved in standard 8bpc.<br />
The video was edited using Production Studio CS5.</p>
<p><i>[Thanks, Jeff!  And thanks for the really nice production.  --J.]</i> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosyna</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2011/03/a-candid-look-at-photoshop-cs5-development.html#comment-33260</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosyna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 14:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=3789#comment-33260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because Mac OS X has been able to work with 64-bit file sizes and more than 4GB ram for a very long time. (It does however apply to Windows).

Second, it&#039;s hard to determine if the speed up is due to memory access or the larger amount of registers. 

&lt;i&gt;[Here&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/08/photoshop_64_bit_registers.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;more info&lt;/a&gt; on the subject of Photoshop &amp; registers.  --J.]&lt;/i&gt; 

But PS uses its own virtual memory system (or did, I think it was changed?) so any Mac OS X specific unrelateds are lost.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because Mac OS X has been able to work with 64-bit file sizes and more than 4GB ram for a very long time. (It does however apply to Windows).</p>
<p>Second, it&#8217;s hard to determine if the speed up is due to memory access or the larger amount of registers. </p>
<p><i>[Here's <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2009/08/photoshop_64_bit_registers.html" rel="nofollow">more info</a> on the subject of Photoshop &amp; registers.  --J.]</i> </p>
<p>But PS uses its own virtual memory system (or did, I think it was changed?) so any Mac OS X specific unrelateds are lost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex kent</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2011/03/a-candid-look-at-photoshop-cs5-development.html#comment-33257</link>
		<dc:creator>alex kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 12:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=3789#comment-33257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hey Rosyna (of Unsanity ?),

would you mind elaborating on why 64-bit doesn&#039;t allow you to work on bigger files?
it certainly appears to allow Ps to use more RAM and I can work radically faster on bigger files. are you just being pedantic and saying that 64-bitness doesn&#039;t change the size of file you can access in terms of read/write to the disk ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey Rosyna (of Unsanity ?),</p>
<p>would you mind elaborating on why 64-bit doesn&#8217;t allow you to work on bigger files?<br />
it certainly appears to allow Ps to use more RAM and I can work radically faster on bigger files. are you just being pedantic and saying that 64-bitness doesn&#8217;t change the size of file you can access in terms of read/write to the disk ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosyna</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2011/03/a-candid-look-at-photoshop-cs5-development.html#comment-33255</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosyna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 12:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=3789#comment-33255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, it seems I am familiar with a lot of people in that video. It also seems like the comments here can&#039;t adequately show the sense of connection I had/have with everyone in that video on a personal level due to that WWDC event.

(In reply to Tom Rohde) But, I&#039;m sorry, Adobe may be at fault for some bad technology decisions or timing decisions in other areas, but the Carbon-&gt;Cocoa switch was not one of them. Carbon was not deprecated then and is not deprecated now which is what made it so impossible to find someone to scream at during the end of that WWDC session.

On an mostly-unrelated note, how do I get some &quot;sit-down&quot; time with someone from Adobe?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, it seems I am familiar with a lot of people in that video. It also seems like the comments here can&#8217;t adequately show the sense of connection I had/have with everyone in that video on a personal level due to that WWDC event.</p>
<p>(In reply to Tom Rohde) But, I&#8217;m sorry, Adobe may be at fault for some bad technology decisions or timing decisions in other areas, but the Carbon-&gt;Cocoa switch was not one of them. Carbon was not deprecated then and is not deprecated now which is what made it so impossible to find someone to scream at during the end of that WWDC session.</p>
<p>On an mostly-unrelated note, how do I get some &#8220;sit-down&#8221; time with someone from Adobe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosyna</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2011/03/a-candid-look-at-photoshop-cs5-development.html#comment-33254</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosyna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 12:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=3789#comment-33254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First, Going 64-bit native does *not* allow you to work with larger files on Mac OS X. 

&lt;i&gt;[Perhaps not exactly, but it allows them to fit into app RAM, and that &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2010/04/photoshop_cs5_64-bit_benchmarks.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;makes working with them faster&lt;/a&gt;.   --J.]&lt;/i&gt; 

Second, I remember that moment at WWDC so well. Everyone in that room freaked the hell out. Seriously, our collective hearts stopped beating at once. There was no one in the room to direct the anger, the hurt, the feeling of betrayal to. 

They should have hooked everyone up to an Ativan drip at the beginning of that WWDC session.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, Going 64-bit native does *not* allow you to work with larger files on Mac OS X. </p>
<p><i>[Perhaps not exactly, but it allows them to fit into app RAM, and that <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2010/04/photoshop_cs5_64-bit_benchmarks.html" rel="nofollow">makes working with them faster</a>.   --J.]</i> </p>
<p>Second, I remember that moment at WWDC so well. Everyone in that room freaked the hell out. Seriously, our collective hearts stopped beating at once. There was no one in the room to direct the anger, the hurt, the feeling of betrayal to. </p>
<p>They should have hooked everyone up to an Ativan drip at the beginning of that WWDC session.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Geisler</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2011/03/a-candid-look-at-photoshop-cs5-development.html#comment-33247</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Geisler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 19:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=3789#comment-33247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Intense and moving! Thanks for this. Photoshop rocked my world like an earthquake in 1989 and flung me onto an entirely different life path that I would not have otherwise traveled. I am sure it has had the same impact on millions of other people. Kudos to the team!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intense and moving! Thanks for this. Photoshop rocked my world like an earthquake in 1989 and flung me onto an entirely different life path that I would not have otherwise traveled. I am sure it has had the same impact on millions of other people. Kudos to the team!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shangara</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2011/03/a-candid-look-at-photoshop-cs5-development.html#comment-33233</link>
		<dc:creator>Shangara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 12:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=3789#comment-33233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s great to put faces to names. The features I personally find most useful are: 

1. Content-aware Fill (Shift+F5 is now an auto reflex!)

2. Lens Profiles. Correcting chromatic aberration used to waste an enormous amount of time, not anymore

3. Double-click to set a slider to zero (default)

4. Convert to 8-bits and save as JPEG

Little refinements do add up during a session.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s great to put faces to names. The features I personally find most useful are: </p>
<p>1. Content-aware Fill (Shift+F5 is now an auto reflex!)</p>
<p>2. Lens Profiles. Correcting chromatic aberration used to waste an enormous amount of time, not anymore</p>
<p>3. Double-click to set a slider to zero (default)</p>
<p>4. Convert to 8-bits and save as JPEG</p>
<p>Little refinements do add up during a session.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ahoeben</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2011/03/a-candid-look-at-photoshop-cs5-development.html#comment-33231</link>
		<dc:creator>ahoeben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 07:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=3789#comment-33231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congratulations on getting this story out. CS5 is an awesome release indeed.

I have got to say that the (animated) PS CS5 splash at the start of the video is badass (all said and done about the CS5 branding)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations on getting this story out. CS5 is an awesome release indeed.</p>
<p>I have got to say that the (animated) PS CS5 splash at the start of the video is badass (all said and done about the CS5 branding)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Dial</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2011/03/a-candid-look-at-photoshop-cs5-development.html#comment-33226</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Dial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 02:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=3789#comment-33226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for linking this up. Really cool to &quot;meet&quot; the folks behind those names. For any of you reading this -- you are rock stars in my book!

Being a Photoshop user from the early 90&#039;s, it is a product that I would be proud to give my heart and soul to. Photoshop CS5 is the greatest version of the product in its history.

-- Matt Dial]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for linking this up. Really cool to &#8220;meet&#8221; the folks behind those names. For any of you reading this &#8212; you are rock stars in my book!</p>
<p>Being a Photoshop user from the early 90&#8242;s, it is a product that I would be proud to give my heart and soul to. Photoshop CS5 is the greatest version of the product in its history.</p>
<p>&#8211; Matt Dial</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2011/03/a-candid-look-at-photoshop-cs5-development.html#comment-33224</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 02:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=3789#comment-33224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s a great video. And CS5 is by far my favorite version of Photoshop. There&#039;s one bug that&#039;s driving me nuts, but I push through it and smile because it&#039;s so good in every other way.

And thanks for keeping Applescript support. It&#039;s saved me hundreds if not thousands of hours of mind-numbing image conversions in the past year. I would have massive RSI if I&#039;d had to do it manually!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a great video. And CS5 is by far my favorite version of Photoshop. There&#8217;s one bug that&#8217;s driving me nuts, but I push through it and smile because it&#8217;s so good in every other way.</p>
<p>And thanks for keeping Applescript support. It&#8217;s saved me hundreds if not thousands of hours of mind-numbing image conversions in the past year. I would have massive RSI if I&#8217;d had to do it manually!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Meit</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2011/03/a-candid-look-at-photoshop-cs5-development.html#comment-33222</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Meit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 01:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=3789#comment-33222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the inside scoop video; thanks PS team for the grueling effort. My only pet peeve: You gotta give credit to the in-house alpha testers. I know they went through hell too! ;-) Testers are not monkeys they are just as creative and tech savvy as the coders. :-) I would love to see a follow up video for testers too!!

&lt;i&gt;[Yes, quite right!  I actually was a beta, then alpha, tester for Adobe prior to working here. I guess my detailed bellyaching proved too much for the team, so I was sentenced to come aboard &amp; watch the sausage-making close-up. :-)  --J.]&lt;/i&gt; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the inside scoop video; thanks PS team for the grueling effort. My only pet peeve: You gotta give credit to the in-house alpha testers. I know they went through hell too! ;-) Testers are not monkeys they are just as creative and tech savvy as the coders. :-) I would love to see a follow up video for testers too!!</p>
<p><i>[Yes, quite right!  I actually was a beta, then alpha, tester for Adobe prior to working here. I guess my detailed bellyaching proved too much for the team, so I was sentenced to come aboard &amp; watch the sausage-making close-up. :-)  --J.]</i> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
