March 11, 2011

The challenge of “How” vs. “What”

“If you told me ‘I’m gonna smear mayo & green stuff all over your fish,'” said Craig Kilborn in an old bit, “I’d probably say ‘No thanks’… but tartar sauce, you make it work.”

Similarly, if you’d asked me last fall, “Hey, do you want an underpowered camera app (one in which you lose features like zoom), a handful of non-adjustable filters, oh, and Yet Another Social Network where you need to locate friends?,” I’d have dutifully asked to see your crack pipe.

And yet I found myself in Germany, sans cell coverage, really missing Instagram. What?

The app has hooked me with its simplicity & the thoughtfulness of its social media integration. It ties creation together with social rewards (“Russell liked my photo! I exist!“), and canned filters share an appeal with Flip cameras: they save me from the temptation of futzing around.

All this comes through while using the app, but it’s hard to convey on paper.

It’s hard, at a glance, to pick up on the novelty/appeal of “how” (doing the same thing differently) as opposed to “what” (doing something different). Put another way, it’s often easier to say, “This app does New Thing X that you’ve never done before” than to say, “Do what you’ve already been doing (and maybe switch away from your current tools), but in a better way.”

Before it was announced, Lightroom suffered from this problem for years*. Potential customers & Adobe staff alike said, “I already have Photoshop, which includes Bridge & Camera Raw, and you’re saying you want me to pay more money to get the same features, minus a bunch?”  The power of “how” came through only in use.

I was driven crazy back then when asking pro photographers whether Camera Raw should be integrated directly in Bridge, as it is in Lightroom (which they hadn’t used), instead of living as a big dialog box.  I surveyed the most thoughtful, forward-thinking alpha testers we knew.  Oh no, they said, it was far more important to do things X, Y, and Z; they direct-vs.-dialog thing was unimportant.  Yet as soon as they’d gotten into Lightroom, they came back and said, “Oh, when will ACR be built right into Bridge? That’s really important!”  Ugh; you don’t say…

Why do I mention all this?  Well, I’ve spent the better part of a year describing interesting concepts for tablet-based creative apps to customers, and it’s been tough to get pre-approval for many (well, besides photo management & client review).  That is, we’ll simply have to take some leaps of faith before people can tell us more–and so we shall.  And just maybe, like tartar sauce & Instagram, the proof will be in the eating**.

* The story of Lightroom’s gestation is an interesting one.
** Proof, incidentally, is not “
in the pudding.”

Posted by John Nack at 3:51 PM on March 11, 2011

Comments

  • Mark — 5:13 PM on March 11, 2011

    >interesting concepts for tablet-based creative apps

    A real world note: I live near a Panera Bread Shop. It’s always full of yuppies and everyone has a computer and a smartphone. All the time, every day. But I have never–not once, not ever–seen any of the yuppies in there using a tablet or pad of any kind. (And, really, for a couple hundred more someone could buy something like an HP TouchSmart that runs real Windows and actual programs.) I guess it’s good that Adobe is exploring the tablet market–hehe–but, really, I hope Adobe is keeping some resources aside to work on programs for real operating systems.

  • Jon — 5:44 PM on March 11, 2011

    Leaps of faith are what companies like Adobe should be doing. Obviously it’s a little harder when you are primarily a software company that expects to make a buck on your software…but take a look at Google and all the awesome products they’re experimenting with (albeit, mostly all still in the Beta stage), and they’re not really “selling” their product. They’re just getting the users, the feedback, and often pioneering new features (features that most people would consider to be no-brainers…even though the user never knew they wanted such a thing until it existed).

  • imajez — 4:04 PM on March 12, 2011

    I’ve always been in favour of ACR being a panel in Bridge as Modal dialogues are very clumsy/inefficient in use.
    Plus it would help people realise Br can actually do some really powerful stuff as opposed to the usual dismissing it out of hand that I see many Adobe product users do.
    I may have mentioned this before! ;-)

Copyright © 2014 Adobe Systems Incorporated. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy and Cookies (Updated)