<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sneak peek: After Effects Warp Stabilizer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2011/04/sneak-peek-after-effects-warp-stabilizer.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2011/04/sneak-peek-after-effects-warp-stabilizer.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 00:36:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2011/04/sneak-peek-after-effects-warp-stabilizer.html#comment-34480</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 16:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=3967#comment-34480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will the warp stabilizer work well with footage shot with a handheld glidecam/merlin or other similar stabilizer?  I would hope you could use the warp stabilizer to make an absolutely perfect shot of footage that was already decently shot on a handheld stabilizer.  Is there any reason why the warp stabilizer would not work well in this situation?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will the warp stabilizer work well with footage shot with a handheld glidecam/merlin or other similar stabilizer?  I would hope you could use the warp stabilizer to make an absolutely perfect shot of footage that was already decently shot on a handheld stabilizer.  Is there any reason why the warp stabilizer would not work well in this situation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ubi Quabar</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2011/04/sneak-peek-after-effects-warp-stabilizer.html#comment-34095</link>
		<dc:creator>Ubi Quabar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 23:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=3967#comment-34095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Iain

I don&#039;t work for CoreMelt but was thinking the same thing - you guys have done this a long time ago (now the analyze in the background bit is a nice edition) and I am not sure it is worth the upgrade price if one already has L&amp;L. What other new features are in v5.5?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iain</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t work for CoreMelt but was thinking the same thing &#8211; you guys have done this a long time ago (now the analyze in the background bit is a nice edition) and I am not sure it is worth the upgrade price if one already has L&amp;L. What other new features are in v5.5?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iain Anderson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2011/04/sneak-peek-after-effects-warp-stabilizer.html#comment-33928</link>
		<dc:creator>Iain Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 10:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=3967#comment-33928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How does this compare to Lock &amp; Load X?

http://library.creativecow.net/anderson_iain/Coremelt_Lock-and-Load-Express/1

(Note: Yes, I do work with CoreMelt, the makers of Lock &amp; Load.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does this compare to Lock &amp; Load X?</p>
<p><a href="http://library.creativecow.net/anderson_iain/Coremelt_Lock-and-Load-Express/1" rel="nofollow">http://library.creativecow.net/anderson_iain/Coremelt_Lock-and-Load-Express/1</a></p>
<p>(Note: Yes, I do work with CoreMelt, the makers of Lock &amp; Load.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveS</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2011/04/sneak-peek-after-effects-warp-stabilizer.html#comment-33923</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 21:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=3967#comment-33923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s a link to the more recent paper that Dan alluded to above:

http://web.cecs.pdx.edu/~fliu/project/subspace_stabilization/

Compared to the previous paper, the new method avoids the fragility of a full 3D camera solve. In addition to general robustness, this gives the added benefit of working on footage that has rolling-shutter artifacts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a link to the more recent paper that Dan alluded to above:</p>
<p><a href="http://web.cecs.pdx.edu/~fliu/project/subspace_stabilization/" rel="nofollow">http://web.cecs.pdx.edu/~fliu/project/subspace_stabilization/</a></p>
<p>Compared to the previous paper, the new method avoids the fragility of a full 3D camera solve. In addition to general robustness, this gives the added benefit of working on footage that has rolling-shutter artifacts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walden</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2011/04/sneak-peek-after-effects-warp-stabilizer.html#comment-33921</link>
		<dc:creator>Walden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 20:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=3967#comment-33921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok - so, WHEN can we expect this to actually become available in the REAL WORLD??? ...and will we be able to obtain it as an add-on to our existing software (in my case, I have the Production Premium CS5 suite, with Affter Effects &amp; Premiere Pro), or will it only be available when a newer version of software is released, and require us to buy or upgrade to a future newer version a year or 2 down the road as the only means of obtaining it, and be in a &quot;holding pattern&quot; in the meantime?

Also, a side-note to some of the &quot;better-than/holier-than-thou types here who seem to feel that such a product is beneath the consideration of a &quot;professional&quot;... good grief!!! get over yourselves!!! ...the world is bigger than just YOU, and whether you like it or not, there a whole lot of new people getting into the world of creating content - your territorialism and preference for exclusivity are out the window and down the tubes. The world is changing, and if you aren&#039;t capable of changing with it, you&#039;re going to get run over by the technological &amp; creative Mack truck that happens to have you in its cross-hairs (halelujah!!!) In case you hadn&#039;t already noticed, I absolutely DETEST ARROGANCE.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok &#8211; so, WHEN can we expect this to actually become available in the REAL WORLD??? &#8230;and will we be able to obtain it as an add-on to our existing software (in my case, I have the Production Premium CS5 suite, with Affter Effects &amp; Premiere Pro), or will it only be available when a newer version of software is released, and require us to buy or upgrade to a future newer version a year or 2 down the road as the only means of obtaining it, and be in a &#8220;holding pattern&#8221; in the meantime?</p>
<p>Also, a side-note to some of the &#8220;better-than/holier-than-thou types here who seem to feel that such a product is beneath the consideration of a &#8220;professional&#8221;&#8230; good grief!!! get over yourselves!!! &#8230;the world is bigger than just YOU, and whether you like it or not, there a whole lot of new people getting into the world of creating content &#8211; your territorialism and preference for exclusivity are out the window and down the tubes. The world is changing, and if you aren&#8217;t capable of changing with it, you&#8217;re going to get run over by the technological &amp; creative Mack truck that happens to have you in its cross-hairs (halelujah!!!) In case you hadn&#8217;t already noticed, I absolutely DETEST ARROGANCE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Apple</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2011/04/sneak-peek-after-effects-warp-stabilizer.html#comment-33920</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Apple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 19:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=3967#comment-33920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John - off topic - watch this trailer, last segment has a great Photoshop joke in it!
http://trailers.apple.com/trailers/wb/crazystupidlove/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John &#8211; off topic &#8211; watch this trailer, last segment has a great Photoshop joke in it!<br />
<a href="http://trailers.apple.com/trailers/wb/crazystupidlove/" rel="nofollow">http://trailers.apple.com/trailers/wb/crazystupidlove/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2011/04/sneak-peek-after-effects-warp-stabilizer.html#comment-33916</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 17:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=3967#comment-33916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John:
This blog used to be a whole lot more interesting and relevant when there was more focus on Photoshop.  Still, I look in every day!

&lt;i&gt;[I hear you, and I knew my day-to-day association with Photoshop wouldn&#039;t last forever; hence the title &quot;John Nack on Adobe&quot; (and not &quot;Photoshop&quot;).  Glad I&#039;m still keeping you checking in, though!  --J.]&lt;/i&gt; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John:<br />
This blog used to be a whole lot more interesting and relevant when there was more focus on Photoshop.  Still, I look in every day!</p>
<p><i>[I hear you, and I knew my day-to-day association with Photoshop wouldn't last forever; hence the title "John Nack on Adobe" (and not "Photoshop").  Glad I'm still keeping you checking in, though!  --J.]</i> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2011/04/sneak-peek-after-effects-warp-stabilizer.html#comment-33915</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 16:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=3967#comment-33915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Faud, if you look at the project pages linked to in Mr. Nack&#039;s previous post:

http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~fliu/project/3dstab.htm

you will see a comparison with with stabilizer in iMovie, which is the same technology that&#039;s in SmoothCam. The Warp Stabilizer technology is based on even newer research than that described in the link.

--Dan]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Faud, if you look at the project pages linked to in Mr. Nack&#8217;s previous post:</p>
<p><a href="http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~fliu/project/3dstab.htm" rel="nofollow">http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~fliu/project/3dstab.htm</a></p>
<p>you will see a comparison with with stabilizer in iMovie, which is the same technology that&#8217;s in SmoothCam. The Warp Stabilizer technology is based on even newer research than that described in the link.</p>
<p>&#8211;Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitry Kitsov</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2011/04/sneak-peek-after-effects-warp-stabilizer.html#comment-33914</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry Kitsov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 16:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=3967#comment-33914</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very nice, hope it is able to correct for rolling shutter on the objects with different angular speeds.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice, hope it is able to correct for rolling shutter on the objects with different angular speeds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fuad Kamal</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2011/04/sneak-peek-after-effects-warp-stabilizer.html#comment-33913</link>
		<dc:creator>Fuad Kamal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 16:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=3967#comment-33913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At a glance this looks nearly identical to the SmoothCam effect in Final Cut Pro.  The rolling shutter correction looks pretty unique, though.  Would be interested in a comparison of the the new AE tech vs. SmoothCam in FCP.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At a glance this looks nearly identical to the SmoothCam effect in Final Cut Pro.  The rolling shutter correction looks pretty unique, though.  Would be interested in a comparison of the the new AE tech vs. SmoothCam in FCP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Butterworth</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2011/04/sneak-peek-after-effects-warp-stabilizer.html#comment-33912</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Butterworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 16:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=3967#comment-33912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is amazing stuff.  I really hope this background rendering gets applied in other areas of AE.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is amazing stuff.  I really hope this background rendering gets applied in other areas of AE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ricardo galvão</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2011/04/sneak-peek-after-effects-warp-stabilizer.html#comment-33911</link>
		<dc:creator>ricardo galvão</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 15:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=3967#comment-33911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congratulations!!!
I hope as PS edit video now you put this tool on it
cause No PRO needs more then PRO
and photocams are making movies now....

&lt;i&gt;[I&#039;ve passed along your suggestion; thanks.  --J.]&lt;/i&gt; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations!!!<br />
I hope as PS edit video now you put this tool on it<br />
cause No PRO needs more then PRO<br />
and photocams are making movies now&#8230;.</p>
<p><i>[I've passed along your suggestion; thanks.  --J.]</i> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
