<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exhibit: Photo Tampering Throughout History</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2011/07/exhibit-photo-tampering-throughout-history.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2011/07/exhibit-photo-tampering-throughout-history.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 17:12:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenna</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2011/07/exhibit-photo-tampering-throughout-history.html#comment-36180</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 21:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=4666#comment-36180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John, this is fascinating.  It&#039;s a subject that&#039;s been on my mind for a long time, but especially since the recent &quot;Vancouver Kiss&quot; POS that was touted as an unretouched on-the-spot lucky-me once-in-a-lifetime photograph. I couldn&#039;t believe that the phony image wasn&#039;t dismissed by everyone in the journalistic field. 

I&#039;m going to keep an eye on what Fourandsix (it&#039;s most certainly a great punny name) is doing and looking for discussions about this issue. I got interested because I&#039;m a retoucher, but I&#039;ve never been &quot;tested&quot; to determine whether a photo was manipulated or not.  The subject came up in a LinkedIn discussion, and that piqued my interest even more. I&#039;m going to check your other references for more information.  Cheers!  G]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, this is fascinating.  It&#8217;s a subject that&#8217;s been on my mind for a long time, but especially since the recent &#8220;Vancouver Kiss&#8221; POS that was touted as an unretouched on-the-spot lucky-me once-in-a-lifetime photograph. I couldn&#8217;t believe that the phony image wasn&#8217;t dismissed by everyone in the journalistic field. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to keep an eye on what Fourandsix (it&#8217;s most certainly a great punny name) is doing and looking for discussions about this issue. I got interested because I&#8217;m a retoucher, but I&#8217;ve never been &#8220;tested&#8221; to determine whether a photo was manipulated or not.  The subject came up in a LinkedIn discussion, and that piqued my interest even more. I&#8217;m going to check your other references for more information.  Cheers!  G</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
