Comments on: Photo juxtapositions http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2012/02/photo-juxtapositions.html Sat, 25 May 2013 19:27:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: imajez http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2012/02/photo-juxtapositions.html#comment-41742 imajez Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:06:23 +0000 https://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=5976#comment-41742 The Coon hound photos simply look like a poor copy of William Wegman’s work.

http://tinyurl.com/7e4naw8

]]> By: Claudius http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2012/02/photo-juxtapositions.html#comment-41708 Claudius Sun, 26 Feb 2012 20:14:24 +0000 https://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=5976#comment-41708 Errr i’m not trying to discredit the linked photographers! I’m merely pointing out that art is oftentimes confusing. And almost as often, i just don’t get it.

]]> By: Claudius http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2012/02/photo-juxtapositions.html#comment-41707 Claudius Sun, 26 Feb 2012 20:12:58 +0000 https://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=5976#comment-41707 We should probably start photographing rotten yoghurt, call it art and alienate everyone who “doesn’t get it”. :-D

]]> By: Scott Valentine http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2012/02/photo-juxtapositions.html#comment-41699 Scott Valentine Sun, 26 Feb 2012 17:20:46 +0000 https://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=5976#comment-41699 I really like the Levitation set, but much of Rachel’s work I just don’t get. The coonhound shots make far more sense to me :) This is a big reason why I don’t refer to myself as a photographer :P

]]>