<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photoshop Touch for Android gets new functionality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2012/02/photoshop-touch-for-android-gets-new-functionality.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2012/02/photoshop-touch-for-android-gets-new-functionality.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 22:47:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cristian Sorega</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2012/02/photoshop-touch-for-android-gets-new-functionality.html#comment-42057</link>
		<dc:creator>Cristian Sorega</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=5833#comment-42057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does the &quot;Improved image quality of images saved to the local Camera Roll/Gallery&quot; means that it can now finally save files bigger than 1600x1600? If not why the limitation? 

Snapseed can save full 12MP files on my iPhone 4 so there really is no excuse not to save bigger files.

&lt;i&gt;[Snapseed is a different kind of app, and it doesn&#039;t support layers.  --J.]&lt;/i&gt; 

I am waiting for this to be available on Android but I would buy Photoshop immediately if they could support full size files.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the &#8220;Improved image quality of images saved to the local Camera Roll/Gallery&#8221; means that it can now finally save files bigger than 1600&#215;1600? If not why the limitation? </p>
<p>Snapseed can save full 12MP files on my iPhone 4 so there really is no excuse not to save bigger files.</p>
<p><i>[Snapseed is a different kind of app, and it doesn't support layers.  --J.]</i> </p>
<p>I am waiting for this to be available on Android but I would buy Photoshop immediately if they could support full size files.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Morey</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2012/02/photoshop-touch-for-android-gets-new-functionality.html#comment-41161</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Morey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=5833#comment-41161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey John - 

So if PS Touch is done in AIR why the delay in getting an iOS version out?

Rich]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey John &#8211; </p>
<p>So if PS Touch is done in AIR why the delay in getting an iOS version out?</p>
<p>Rich</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: haleonearth</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2012/02/photoshop-touch-for-android-gets-new-functionality.html#comment-41145</link>
		<dc:creator>haleonearth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=5833#comment-41145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While anything but brilliant, this was the best theory I could come up with as well. Unfortunately there is no way I&#039;ve been able to frame it that manages to pass the &quot;Kyle test&quot;. i.e. some super manager named Kyle with an slip of paper from the UMN Carslon School of Management thinks that this is the right &quot;strategic&quot; call. Meanwhile the creatives of the world aren&#039;t even laughing anymore. Instead the majority have moved on to embrace independent creative software from people that actually seem to &quot;get it&quot;. 

Thankfully JoNa is drinking in life right now by challenging the boundaries of his perspective and experiencing an alien lifestyle. Very admirable, very commendable, and very respectable. I love this guy. How Adobe has managed to keep him on staff this long without driving him away with their absolute boobery is beyond me.

Carpe diem everybody! It&#039;ll all be over before you know it!

☮]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While anything but brilliant, this was the best theory I could come up with as well. Unfortunately there is no way I&#8217;ve been able to frame it that manages to pass the &#8220;Kyle test&#8221;. i.e. some super manager named Kyle with an slip of paper from the UMN Carslon School of Management thinks that this is the right &#8220;strategic&#8221; call. Meanwhile the creatives of the world aren&#8217;t even laughing anymore. Instead the majority have moved on to embrace independent creative software from people that actually seem to &#8220;get it&#8221;. </p>
<p>Thankfully JoNa is drinking in life right now by challenging the boundaries of his perspective and experiencing an alien lifestyle. Very admirable, very commendable, and very respectable. I love this guy. How Adobe has managed to keep him on staff this long without driving him away with their absolute boobery is beyond me.</p>
<p>Carpe diem everybody! It&#8217;ll all be over before you know it!</p>
<p>☮</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: haleonearth</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2012/02/photoshop-touch-for-android-gets-new-functionality.html#comment-41144</link>
		<dc:creator>haleonearth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=5833#comment-41144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well played. While laughably transparent, way to still try and pass the buck!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well played. While laughably transparent, way to still try and pass the buck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: haleonearth</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2012/02/photoshop-touch-for-android-gets-new-functionality.html#comment-41143</link>
		<dc:creator>haleonearth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=5833#comment-41143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry JoNa, but pimping updates to &quot;Adroid&quot; prior to an iOs release is telling. Not a personal attack. Just curious as to which &quot;Executive Manager&quot; named Kyle the rest of us can ping so as to remind him what a pathetic job he&#039;s doing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry JoNa, but pimping updates to &#8220;Adroid&#8221; prior to an iOs release is telling. Not a personal attack. Just curious as to which &#8220;Executive Manager&#8221; named Kyle the rest of us can ping so as to remind him what a pathetic job he&#8217;s doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: melgross</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2012/02/photoshop-touch-for-android-gets-new-functionality.html#comment-41128</link>
		<dc:creator>melgross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=5833#comment-41128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, this is Adobe. Several months ago, they said at the event for this that we wouldn&#039;t see it on iOS for months after it came out on Android.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, this is Adobe. Several months ago, they said at the event for this that we wouldn&#8217;t see it on iOS for months after it came out on Android.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claudius</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2012/02/photoshop-touch-for-android-gets-new-functionality.html#comment-41113</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=5833#comment-41113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By the way, why does it require &quot;read contacts&quot;- and &quot;phone state&quot;-permissions? Doesn&#039;t make sense to me.

&lt;i&gt;[I&#039;ve checked with the team, and you shouldn&#039;t be seeing prompts like that.  I&#039;m not sure what could be causing them.  Any ideas?  --J.]&lt;/i&gt; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, why does it require &#8220;read contacts&#8221;- and &#8220;phone state&#8221;-permissions? Doesn&#8217;t make sense to me.</p>
<p><i>[I've checked with the team, and you shouldn't be seeing prompts like that.  I'm not sure what could be causing them.  Any ideas?  --J.]</i> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claudius</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2012/02/photoshop-touch-for-android-gets-new-functionality.html#comment-41111</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=5833#comment-41111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guys, come on. Have you ever released something to the App store? If you haven&#039;t this is a good read for you. As I said before: This is probably not adobe, who keeps you waiting.

http://scottkelby.com/2011/seriously-where-in-the-h-is-the-next-issue-of-light-it-magazine/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys, come on. Have you ever released something to the App store? If you haven&#8217;t this is a good read for you. As I said before: This is probably not adobe, who keeps you waiting.</p>
<p><a href="http://scottkelby.com/2011/seriously-where-in-the-h-is-the-next-issue-of-light-it-magazine/" rel="nofollow">http://scottkelby.com/2011/seriously-where-in-the-h-is-the-next-issue-of-light-it-magazine/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claudius</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2012/02/photoshop-touch-for-android-gets-new-functionality.html#comment-41109</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=5833#comment-41109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I bet they released it at the same time, but it may take days or even weeks to be available in the App Store. Even, if it&#039;s &quot;just&quot; an update.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet they released it at the same time, but it may take days or even weeks to be available in the App Store. Even, if it&#8217;s &#8220;just&#8221; an update.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Morey</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2012/02/photoshop-touch-for-android-gets-new-functionality.html#comment-41084</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Morey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=5833#comment-41084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can see the &quot;logic&quot; in building native apps, but it would seem that, since Adobe builds and markets AIR that they should &quot;drink their own cool aid&quot; and build apps on their own platform. Plus, I&quot;m Flex/Java developer currently learning about mobile development on both Android and iOS because I fear for the future of Flash/Flex and ultimately AIR as a platform. If Adobe seemed committed to it I would feel better.

&lt;i&gt;[PS Touch *is* done in AIR.  We&#039;re just not making a big deal about it as most customers likely won&#039;t care one way or the other.  They just want good tools that work well.  --J.]&lt;/i&gt; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see the &#8220;logic&#8221; in building native apps, but it would seem that, since Adobe builds and markets AIR that they should &#8220;drink their own cool aid&#8221; and build apps on their own platform. Plus, I&#8221;m Flex/Java developer currently learning about mobile development on both Android and iOS because I fear for the future of Flash/Flex and ultimately AIR as a platform. If Adobe seemed committed to it I would feel better.</p>
<p><i>[PS Touch *is* done in AIR.  We're just not making a big deal about it as most customers likely won't care one way or the other.  They just want good tools that work well.  --J.]</i> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: melgross</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2012/02/photoshop-touch-for-android-gets-new-functionality.html#comment-41082</link>
		<dc:creator>melgross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=5833#comment-41082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can only assume that Adobe is attempting to encourage Android tablet sales as much as possible by releasing this on Android first. It&#039;s interesting to note that virtually all photographers, either professional, or advanced amateur, use iPads as their tablet of choice, as there are a good number of pro level apps available, and therefor, there&#039;s no reason to buy anything else.

This app is the only reason to buy an Android tablet, if someone just can&#039;t wait for it to appear on an iPad, or if they just can&#039;t imagine themselves ever buying an Apple product.

This won&#039;t work on a cheap tablet very well, so one won&#039;t save any money by going to Android. I can&#039;t think of any other reason why Adobe is doing it this way. So far, John has refused to get into this controversy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can only assume that Adobe is attempting to encourage Android tablet sales as much as possible by releasing this on Android first. It&#8217;s interesting to note that virtually all photographers, either professional, or advanced amateur, use iPads as their tablet of choice, as there are a good number of pro level apps available, and therefor, there&#8217;s no reason to buy anything else.</p>
<p>This app is the only reason to buy an Android tablet, if someone just can&#8217;t wait for it to appear on an iPad, or if they just can&#8217;t imagine themselves ever buying an Apple product.</p>
<p>This won&#8217;t work on a cheap tablet very well, so one won&#8217;t save any money by going to Android. I can&#8217;t think of any other reason why Adobe is doing it this way. So far, John has refused to get into this controversy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2012/02/photoshop-touch-for-android-gets-new-functionality.html#comment-41075</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=5833#comment-41075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess I will just have to purchase an Android device since Adobe isn&#039;t releasing these for iOS. NOT!
What is Adobe thinking? You&#039;re not punishing us, you&#039;re punishing yourself, Adobe.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I will just have to purchase an Android device since Adobe isn&#8217;t releasing these for iOS. NOT!<br />
What is Adobe thinking? You&#8217;re not punishing us, you&#8217;re punishing yourself, Adobe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2012/02/photoshop-touch-for-android-gets-new-functionality.html#comment-41070</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=5833#comment-41070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hoping that the people working so hard to bring this to iOS have counterparts in the Android group that will bring Adobe Revel to Android+PC.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoping that the people working so hard to bring this to iOS have counterparts in the Android group that will bring Adobe Revel to Android+PC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Stoff</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2012/02/photoshop-touch-for-android-gets-new-functionality.html#comment-41068</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Stoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=5833#comment-41068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the update, John. It&#039;s hard to wait for the iOS versions of the Touch suite, but I am sure it&#039;ll be worth it. Hope the team knows we&#039;re excited.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the update, John. It&#8217;s hard to wait for the iOS versions of the Touch suite, but I am sure it&#8217;ll be worth it. Hope the team knows we&#8217;re excited.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Swalwell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2012/02/photoshop-touch-for-android-gets-new-functionality.html#comment-41066</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Swalwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=5833#comment-41066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: iOS... is there somewhere we can send cookies for those who are willing to work a little harder?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: iOS&#8230; is there somewhere we can send cookies for those who are willing to work a little harder?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
