<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Demo: Conditional actions in Photoshop CS6</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2013/01/demo-conditional-actions-in-photoshop-cs6.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2013/01/demo-conditional-actions-in-photoshop-cs6.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 19:27:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2013/01/demo-conditional-actions-in-photoshop-cs6.html#comment-75007</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 05:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=8258#comment-75007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been using Adobe products for years, as a self-employed print designer. Will NEVER go to the cloud for oh so many reasons.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using Adobe products for years, as a self-employed print designer. Will NEVER go to the cloud for oh so many reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tall41</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2013/01/demo-conditional-actions-in-photoshop-cs6.html#comment-72532</link>
		<dc:creator>tall41</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 23:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=8258#comment-72532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sadly another example of the new(ish)bussiness model.....
become a virtual manopaly and when you become powerfull enough ream your loyal customers for every cent you can get by locking them into a permanant rental deal...
Look out this is the future......]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly another example of the new(ish)bussiness model&#8230;..<br />
become a virtual manopaly and when you become powerfull enough ream your loyal customers for every cent you can get by locking them into a permanant rental deal&#8230;<br />
Look out this is the future&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: San</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2013/01/demo-conditional-actions-in-photoshop-cs6.html#comment-66206</link>
		<dc:creator>San</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 20:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=8258#comment-66206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks much; I&#039;ll download the scripting guide and look it over.

BTW, to change topic somewhat... I see a lot of non-subscription customers in this thread are angry that the current permanent version of Photoshop doesn&#039;t include the conditionals. I just discovered that it works both ways... there are features (or at least one feature) that are in the permanent version and *not* in the subscription version: namely, View at &quot;Print Size.&quot;

I&#039;m stunned at this omission, since Print Size is such a basic feature and was always available in earlier days. Makes me wonder if the issue isn&#039;t so much Adobe being evil and trying to force everyone into the subscription model... maybe it&#039;s more just Adobe being somewhat discombobulated with a forked development model. I don&#039;t see why you&#039;d need to fork development (generally a bad idea anyway) just to have two payment models.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks much; I&#8217;ll download the scripting guide and look it over.</p>
<p>BTW, to change topic somewhat&#8230; I see a lot of non-subscription customers in this thread are angry that the current permanent version of Photoshop doesn&#8217;t include the conditionals. I just discovered that it works both ways&#8230; there are features (or at least one feature) that are in the permanent version and *not* in the subscription version: namely, View at &#8220;Print Size.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m stunned at this omission, since Print Size is such a basic feature and was always available in earlier days. Makes me wonder if the issue isn&#8217;t so much Adobe being evil and trying to force everyone into the subscription model&#8230; maybe it&#8217;s more just Adobe being somewhat discombobulated with a forked development model. I don&#8217;t see why you&#8217;d need to fork development (generally a bad idea anyway) just to have two payment models.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Tranberry</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2013/01/demo-conditional-actions-in-photoshop-cs6.html#comment-66196</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Tranberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 15:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=8258#comment-66196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi San,

Have you looked at our Javascript SDK? Everything you want to do is possible using pure Javascript. Conditional actions in Photoshop are designed to solve basic conditionals for non-code-monkey types.

http://www.adobe.com/devnet/photoshop/scripting.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi San,</p>
<p>Have you looked at our Javascript SDK? Everything you want to do is possible using pure Javascript. Conditional actions in Photoshop are designed to solve basic conditionals for non-code-monkey types.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.adobe.com/devnet/photoshop/scripting.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.adobe.com/devnet/photoshop/scripting.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: San</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2013/01/demo-conditional-actions-in-photoshop-cs6.html#comment-66178</link>
		<dc:creator>San</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=8258#comment-66178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I find the Conditional Actions disappointingly weak. There are very few allowable conditions; I&#039;d like to be able to define my own. This would presumably require either some kind of flexible GUI with nested, chained drop-down menus, or perhaps a JavaScript-like conditional scripting syntax, to define the conditions. (Either one would be fine with me.)

My other complaint is that the resultant actions I&#039;m allowed to play can apparently only come from the same set the conditional action is in. In previous actions I&#039;ve defined (not conditionals), I was allowed to play actions from other action sets as long as they were loaded. Actually, this would be less important if I were allowed to nest sets. The issue is that I don&#039;t want my actions list cluttered up with sub-actions whose only purpose is to be called by other actions. Another option would be to allow some sub-actions to exist in the set but not show up in the list, at least not when in Buttons mode.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find the Conditional Actions disappointingly weak. There are very few allowable conditions; I&#8217;d like to be able to define my own. This would presumably require either some kind of flexible GUI with nested, chained drop-down menus, or perhaps a JavaScript-like conditional scripting syntax, to define the conditions. (Either one would be fine with me.)</p>
<p>My other complaint is that the resultant actions I&#8217;m allowed to play can apparently only come from the same set the conditional action is in. In previous actions I&#8217;ve defined (not conditionals), I was allowed to play actions from other action sets as long as they were loaded. Actually, this would be less important if I were allowed to nest sets. The issue is that I don&#8217;t want my actions list cluttered up with sub-actions whose only purpose is to be called by other actions. Another option would be to allow some sub-actions to exist in the set but not show up in the list, at least not when in Buttons mode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natalie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2013/01/demo-conditional-actions-in-photoshop-cs6.html#comment-66139</link>
		<dc:creator>Natalie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=8258#comment-66139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Allen has expressed my sentiments very eloquently. (And so have many others that have replied to this article.) 

I&#039;d like to add that Adobe&#039;s preferred method of making their software available (the Cloud) forces people to commit their future dollars before they know if/where those dollars will come from. It&#039;s this very type of thing (being done by individuals, business, and the government) that has caused the horrible economic conditions that we now have in this country.

On principle, if there is any way to avoid doing so, I will NOT promise or commit to perpetual future spending. It puts me at too much risk.

J... I know that Adobe wants folks to subscribe instead of buying outright. However, have you thought about what your customers want? There should be a solution that is good for both the Company and the Customers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allen has expressed my sentiments very eloquently. (And so have many others that have replied to this article.) </p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to add that Adobe&#8217;s preferred method of making their software available (the Cloud) forces people to commit their future dollars before they know if/where those dollars will come from. It&#8217;s this very type of thing (being done by individuals, business, and the government) that has caused the horrible economic conditions that we now have in this country.</p>
<p>On principle, if there is any way to avoid doing so, I will NOT promise or commit to perpetual future spending. It puts me at too much risk.</p>
<p>J&#8230; I know that Adobe wants folks to subscribe instead of buying outright. However, have you thought about what your customers want? There should be a solution that is good for both the Company and the Customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Tranberry</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2013/01/demo-conditional-actions-in-photoshop-cs6.html#comment-66134</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Tranberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 23:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=8258#comment-66134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Fred,

You do not need to be connected to the internet constantly in order to run Photoshop. It runs on your desktop as it always has. Once you install and activate, you only need to be online to renew your subscription.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Fred,</p>
<p>You do not need to be connected to the internet constantly in order to run Photoshop. It runs on your desktop as it always has. Once you install and activate, you only need to be online to renew your subscription.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2013/01/demo-conditional-actions-in-photoshop-cs6.html#comment-66124</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=8258#comment-66124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I paid a lot for the program and I should be considered a valued customer. I guess Adobe does not consider us valued customers because we paid up front. It&#039;s wrong we should get the updates! Very disappointed in the lack of customer care.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I paid a lot for the program and I should be considered a valued customer. I guess Adobe does not consider us valued customers because we paid up front. It&#8217;s wrong we should get the updates! Very disappointed in the lack of customer care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Casselman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2013/01/demo-conditional-actions-in-photoshop-cs6.html#comment-65630</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Casselman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 03:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=8258#comment-65630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just came across this thread and would like to add my 2 cents worth. I&#039;m a fine art photographer and have owned every version of Photoshop since around 1996. The cloud just doesn&#039;t work for me since we spend time in fairly remote areas devoid of any internet connection--me, my camera, my MacbookPro, and our VW camper. With the cloud, I&#039;d have no Photoshop. Even at our log cabin, our only internet connection is via a slow radio link. And no cellular connection at all. Not sure if the cloud would work there or not. At home, we have 25 Mbps. No problem. But away, it&#039;s a problem

~Fred]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just came across this thread and would like to add my 2 cents worth. I&#8217;m a fine art photographer and have owned every version of Photoshop since around 1996. The cloud just doesn&#8217;t work for me since we spend time in fairly remote areas devoid of any internet connection&#8211;me, my camera, my MacbookPro, and our VW camper. With the cloud, I&#8217;d have no Photoshop. Even at our log cabin, our only internet connection is via a slow radio link. And no cellular connection at all. Not sure if the cloud would work there or not. At home, we have 25 Mbps. No problem. But away, it&#8217;s a problem</p>
<p>~Fred</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen Cobb</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2013/01/demo-conditional-actions-in-photoshop-cs6.html#comment-58522</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Cobb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 18:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=8258#comment-58522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I understand Adobe&#039;s strategy of moving users onto the subscription model, and I don&#039;t think it&#039;s a bad idea, except for one issue -- long-term investment. 

I&#039;ve spent several grand on licenses, and in a financial pinch I can keep using the apps without upgrading. But if I invest another few thousand in a Cloud sub, for, say, 4 years, I&#039;ll have another few thousand invested, but no &quot;equity.&quot; If the rent goes up a little, and my income drops, I&#039;m left without ANY tools if I can&#039;t afford the rent. This just doesn&#039;t seem like the best way to handle long-term subscribers (let alone long-term prior licensees). With a license, if I can&#039;t afford to upgrade, at least I still have the (aging) set of apps.

If Adobe could come up with some contingency plan for a person who has been a subscriber for years and then can&#039;t afford to continue, I&#039;d be happy to join the cloud. But if I know I&#039;m going to be dead in the water if I ever can&#039;t afford the subscription, I can&#039;t see how I would ever justify dropping the 18-month license-upgrade model. 

If Adobe really wants me (as opposed to new customers) to change my customer relationship, I really think they have to take this issue into account. 

Some kind of gradual &quot;investiture&quot; process would seem to make sense -- you get fully invested after, say, 3 years of subscribing, and then if you can&#039;t keep up the rent you get a frozen version-specific license of some kind. Perhaps the investiture license itself has a lifespan -- I&#039;m sure there&#039;s a scheme that would work for users and for Accounting. 

Sadly (for me), I&#039;ve never been able to get any acknowledgement of this issue, while the pressure to quit my license is never-ending. An incentive in this area (beyond a 1-year discount) would help a lot. As a freelancer, my cashflow is very tricky at times, and jobs move me from one technology to another unpredictably. It would be a lot easier if I felt that Adobe wants to keep me going, and not just cut me off during the lean months (or months when I simply can&#039;t use the suite for current projects).

Allen]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand Adobe&#8217;s strategy of moving users onto the subscription model, and I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a bad idea, except for one issue &#8212; long-term investment. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve spent several grand on licenses, and in a financial pinch I can keep using the apps without upgrading. But if I invest another few thousand in a Cloud sub, for, say, 4 years, I&#8217;ll have another few thousand invested, but no &#8220;equity.&#8221; If the rent goes up a little, and my income drops, I&#8217;m left without ANY tools if I can&#8217;t afford the rent. This just doesn&#8217;t seem like the best way to handle long-term subscribers (let alone long-term prior licensees). With a license, if I can&#8217;t afford to upgrade, at least I still have the (aging) set of apps.</p>
<p>If Adobe could come up with some contingency plan for a person who has been a subscriber for years and then can&#8217;t afford to continue, I&#8217;d be happy to join the cloud. But if I know I&#8217;m going to be dead in the water if I ever can&#8217;t afford the subscription, I can&#8217;t see how I would ever justify dropping the 18-month license-upgrade model. </p>
<p>If Adobe really wants me (as opposed to new customers) to change my customer relationship, I really think they have to take this issue into account. </p>
<p>Some kind of gradual &#8220;investiture&#8221; process would seem to make sense &#8212; you get fully invested after, say, 3 years of subscribing, and then if you can&#8217;t keep up the rent you get a frozen version-specific license of some kind. Perhaps the investiture license itself has a lifespan &#8212; I&#8217;m sure there&#8217;s a scheme that would work for users and for Accounting. </p>
<p>Sadly (for me), I&#8217;ve never been able to get any acknowledgement of this issue, while the pressure to quit my license is never-ending. An incentive in this area (beyond a 1-year discount) would help a lot. As a freelancer, my cashflow is very tricky at times, and jobs move me from one technology to another unpredictably. It would be a lot easier if I felt that Adobe wants to keep me going, and not just cut me off during the lean months (or months when I simply can&#8217;t use the suite for current projects).</p>
<p>Allen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2013/01/demo-conditional-actions-in-photoshop-cs6.html#comment-57978</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 07:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=8258#comment-57978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[re non connected machines: this has been a big annoyance to me, but I ran across the solution.

It is in the install window when you install CSX. one of the options gives explicit instructions on how to install on a non connected machine by getting a &#039;code&#039; from a connected machine.  Sorry, forget the details.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re non connected machines: this has been a big annoyance to me, but I ran across the solution.</p>
<p>It is in the install window when you install CSX. one of the options gives explicit instructions on how to install on a non connected machine by getting a &#8216;code&#8217; from a connected machine.  Sorry, forget the details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2013/01/demo-conditional-actions-in-photoshop-cs6.html#comment-57977</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 07:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=8258#comment-57977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sure you can have it; you just chose to purchase the update every year or 2 version.

If that is what you need or want, no problem. 

But why whine?  you are certainly free to buy what you seem to lust for. 

condemnation from customers who bought the &#039;wrong thing&#039; making a difference?  who knows what Adobe will do, but they are not stupid.  as for a difference with me, it brings a smile :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sure you can have it; you just chose to purchase the update every year or 2 version.</p>
<p>If that is what you need or want, no problem. </p>
<p>But why whine?  you are certainly free to buy what you seem to lust for. </p>
<p>condemnation from customers who bought the &#8216;wrong thing&#8217; making a difference?  who knows what Adobe will do, but they are not stupid.  as for a difference with me, it brings a smile :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austin Dimmer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2013/01/demo-conditional-actions-in-photoshop-cs6.html#comment-57906</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin Dimmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 01:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=8258#comment-57906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d like to echo the frustrations about the Creative Cloud only updates. I&#039;ve been a Master Collection owner since CS3 and attended MAX 3 times. I&#039;m a huge Adobe fan. The products are superb. I have a fear about committing to the Creative Cloud. Here is my fear. 

FIrst, in the UK I (along with many other Adobe Customers, RedGate software is a company I know thinks similarly) feel that I am getting ripped of if I purchase Adobe software. The pricing if the products is much higher in the UK than it would be if I purchased in the US. How can this be the case for a downloadable product? The priced should be the same no matter what country you live in and should only vary by taxation rates applied where the product is sold, the base price should be the same. 

Second, if I purchase the Creative Cloud not only will my subscription cost more but after the first year 40% discount expires I will be charged a seemingly astronomical monthly sum. What happens then if I stop my subscription? It&#039;s my current understanding that I would not then be able to access any of the software that I will feel that I have paid for but am now no longer entitled to use.

 If I make an outright purchase of the software then I will be able to use the software even if I can&#039;t afford to upgrade to the latest major version but I won&#039;t be able to use incremental minor release updates that will be available to Creative Cloud subscribers.

I feel hosed in either case. I&#039;d love to keep up with the latest Adobe software and engage with an awesome community. Please try to finds plan that can keep me current without making me feel like I am being ripped off or hosed!

Good luck

Austin]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to echo the frustrations about the Creative Cloud only updates. I&#8217;ve been a Master Collection owner since CS3 and attended MAX 3 times. I&#8217;m a huge Adobe fan. The products are superb. I have a fear about committing to the Creative Cloud. Here is my fear. </p>
<p>FIrst, in the UK I (along with many other Adobe Customers, RedGate software is a company I know thinks similarly) feel that I am getting ripped of if I purchase Adobe software. The pricing if the products is much higher in the UK than it would be if I purchased in the US. How can this be the case for a downloadable product? The priced should be the same no matter what country you live in and should only vary by taxation rates applied where the product is sold, the base price should be the same. </p>
<p>Second, if I purchase the Creative Cloud not only will my subscription cost more but after the first year 40% discount expires I will be charged a seemingly astronomical monthly sum. What happens then if I stop my subscription? It&#8217;s my current understanding that I would not then be able to access any of the software that I will feel that I have paid for but am now no longer entitled to use.</p>
<p> If I make an outright purchase of the software then I will be able to use the software even if I can&#8217;t afford to upgrade to the latest major version but I won&#8217;t be able to use incremental minor release updates that will be available to Creative Cloud subscribers.</p>
<p>I feel hosed in either case. I&#8217;d love to keep up with the latest Adobe software and engage with an awesome community. Please try to finds plan that can keep me current without making me feel like I am being ripped off or hosed!</p>
<p>Good luck</p>
<p>Austin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Grant</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2013/01/demo-conditional-actions-in-photoshop-cs6.html#comment-57874</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 22:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=8258#comment-57874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like others who have responded I feel that the restriction of a much-needed function to cloud-only users is short-sighted and punishes those who have purchased licenses. My company has 7 Photoshop licenses and have purchased every upgrade as they have come out. Now, a feature I have needed for years is available, and I can&#039;t have it. I hope that customer condemnation will shame Adobe into changing their mind.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like others who have responded I feel that the restriction of a much-needed function to cloud-only users is short-sighted and punishes those who have purchased licenses. My company has 7 Photoshop licenses and have purchased every upgrade as they have come out. Now, a feature I have needed for years is available, and I can&#8217;t have it. I hope that customer condemnation will shame Adobe into changing their mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Sinks</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2013/01/demo-conditional-actions-in-photoshop-cs6.html#comment-57862</link>
		<dc:creator>James Sinks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 21:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=8258#comment-57862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I didn&#039;t even think Quark were still around.  I&#039;ll have to see how XPress stacks up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t even think Quark were still around.  I&#8217;ll have to see how XPress stacks up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
