<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Demo: Convert Photoshop artwork to CSS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2013/01/demo-convert-photoshop-artwork-to-css.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2013/01/demo-convert-photoshop-artwork-to-css.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 04:13:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2013/01/demo-convert-photoshop-artwork-to-css.html#comment-65043</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 11:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=8495#comment-65043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wouldn&#039;t lose any sleep over not getting the cloud only features.

There are more bugs and half the new features don&#039;t work right.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t lose any sleep over not getting the cloud only features.</p>
<p>There are more bugs and half the new features don&#8217;t work right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Popham</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2013/01/demo-convert-photoshop-artwork-to-css.html#comment-64573</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Popham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 01:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=8495#comment-64573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;While it is very easy to replace Photoshop it isn’t so easy to replace the rest of the product suite.&quot;

Just curious... with what would you replace Photoshop?  If they drop perpetual licenses I&#039;ll be looking.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;While it is very easy to replace Photoshop it isn’t so easy to replace the rest of the product suite.&#8221;</p>
<p>Just curious&#8230; with what would you replace Photoshop?  If they drop perpetual licenses I&#8217;ll be looking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denbo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2013/01/demo-convert-photoshop-artwork-to-css.html#comment-64479</link>
		<dc:creator>Denbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 21:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=8495#comment-64479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Han, the CFO of Adobe made it pretty clear Adobe&#039;s goal was to &quot;drive migration to a subscription model.&quot;  The reason why was (as he stated), &quot;“This will yield a stronger, more predictable recurring revenue model with higher long-term revenue growth.&quot;  
http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/pressroom/pressreleases/201212/Q412Earnings.html

I understand the need to increase revenue but from many other forums (adobe, dpreview, etc...) there are a load of people who are upset over this.

I suppose once you become a big enough company you can dictate the terms to your customers.

While it is very easy to replace Photoshop it isn&#039;t so easy to replace the rest of the product suite.  

But I&#039;m working on it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Han, the CFO of Adobe made it pretty clear Adobe&#8217;s goal was to &#8220;drive migration to a subscription model.&#8221;  The reason why was (as he stated), &#8220;“This will yield a stronger, more predictable recurring revenue model with higher long-term revenue growth.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/pressroom/pressreleases/201212/Q412Earnings.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/pressroom/pressreleases/201212/Q412Earnings.html</a></p>
<p>I understand the need to increase revenue but from many other forums (adobe, dpreview, etc&#8230;) there are a load of people who are upset over this.</p>
<p>I suppose once you become a big enough company you can dictate the terms to your customers.</p>
<p>While it is very easy to replace Photoshop it isn&#8217;t so easy to replace the rest of the product suite.  </p>
<p>But I&#8217;m working on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: han smit</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2013/01/demo-convert-photoshop-artwork-to-css.html#comment-64478</link>
		<dc:creator>han smit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 21:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=8495#comment-64478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree that it is not customer-friendly to deliver the new features only to creative cloud subscribers.
Technical it must be  simple to add the new features in an update.

I can see this only as a way to force customers to make a subscription.  I don&#039;t know if it is a good policy to keep loyal customers happy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that it is not customer-friendly to deliver the new features only to creative cloud subscribers.<br />
Technical it must be  simple to add the new features in an update.</p>
<p>I can see this only as a way to force customers to make a subscription.  I don&#8217;t know if it is a good policy to keep loyal customers happy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denbo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2013/01/demo-convert-photoshop-artwork-to-css.html#comment-64433</link>
		<dc:creator>Denbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=8495#comment-64433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Imagine if Microsoft forced people to pay a subscription for Windows 8?  Or if Apple made you pay a subscription to MacOS (or iOS heavens forbid)?

We&#039;d see a huge surge towards alternatives such as Linux. 

I used to think I was alone in feeling like Adobe was treating me like cattle. 

Adobe is gambling that people will take the bait and upgrade and so far, according to their CFO, it&#039;s working.

That&#039;s good for them but I am no longer a loyal user.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine if Microsoft forced people to pay a subscription for Windows 8?  Or if Apple made you pay a subscription to MacOS (or iOS heavens forbid)?</p>
<p>We&#8217;d see a huge surge towards alternatives such as Linux. </p>
<p>I used to think I was alone in feeling like Adobe was treating me like cattle. </p>
<p>Adobe is gambling that people will take the bait and upgrade and so far, according to their CFO, it&#8217;s working.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s good for them but I am no longer a loyal user.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garconis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2013/01/demo-convert-photoshop-artwork-to-css.html#comment-64409</link>
		<dc:creator>Garconis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=8495#comment-64409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Totally agree. I feel like Adobe is leaving us CS6 (non cloud) users in the dust. Will we ever get a &quot;new feature&quot;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree. I feel like Adobe is leaving us CS6 (non cloud) users in the dust. Will we ever get a &#8220;new feature&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denbo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2013/01/demo-convert-photoshop-artwork-to-css.html#comment-64358</link>
		<dc:creator>Denbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 14:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=8495#comment-64358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John, do you think you could warn people that new features like this are ONLY for creative cloud subscribers and not for those people who actually purchased CS6?  

I must admit, I feel terribly stupid purchasing CS6 Production.  It&#039;s like I am a &#039;second class citizen&#039; regardless of how long I&#039;ve been a faithful Adobe customer. 

I am sure I will be flamed by those who prefer the subscription model but I feel like I&#039;ve been jerked around by Adobe.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, do you think you could warn people that new features like this are ONLY for creative cloud subscribers and not for those people who actually purchased CS6?  </p>
<p>I must admit, I feel terribly stupid purchasing CS6 Production.  It&#8217;s like I am a &#8216;second class citizen&#8217; regardless of how long I&#8217;ve been a faithful Adobe customer. </p>
<p>I am sure I will be flamed by those who prefer the subscription model but I feel like I&#8217;ve been jerked around by Adobe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
