<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Of drills &amp; holes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2013/02/of-drills-holes.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2013/02/of-drills-holes.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:12:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2013/02/of-drills-holes.html#comment-65503</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 04:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=8546#comment-65503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well if it&#039;s not simple enough no one can handle it. So to help the kids out with the complicated stuff, Alan Alda has this going on right now:

http://scim.ag/AldaFlame

In the spirit of solving that easily enough, Adobe can likely help the rest of us out with their software offerings by writing down a few terse words about the complicated gyrations we need to use to get that hole into a metaphorical wall.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well if it&#8217;s not simple enough no one can handle it. So to help the kids out with the complicated stuff, Alan Alda has this going on right now:</p>
<p><a href="http://scim.ag/AldaFlame" rel="nofollow">http://scim.ag/AldaFlame</a></p>
<p>In the spirit of solving that easily enough, Adobe can likely help the rest of us out with their software offerings by writing down a few terse words about the complicated gyrations we need to use to get that hole into a metaphorical wall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speed</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2013/02/of-drills-holes.html#comment-65497</link>
		<dc:creator>Speed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 23:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=8546#comment-65497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People don&#039;t buy printers, they buy pictures. But I&#039;ve never been to a store that stocks printers that also has example pictures to look at.

The same could be said for cameras.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People don&#8217;t buy printers, they buy pictures. But I&#8217;ve never been to a store that stocks printers that also has example pictures to look at.</p>
<p>The same could be said for cameras.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Broom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2013/02/of-drills-holes.html#comment-65496</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Broom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 22:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=8546#comment-65496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having used Adobe products for many years now I do feel it would be really good if Adobe fixed what they&#039;d made already before the bounce us with the next iteration of their programs.  Would be really great if tools were standardised across the range of products.  Some really cool features in, say InDesign, don&#039;t seem to make it to other programs and programs like Adobe Captivate seem to lag behind other programs.  Oh and the Cloud stuff....I still don&#039;t get it (maybe I&#039;m slow)

Richard]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having used Adobe products for many years now I do feel it would be really good if Adobe fixed what they&#8217;d made already before the bounce us with the next iteration of their programs.  Would be really great if tools were standardised across the range of products.  Some really cool features in, say InDesign, don&#8217;t seem to make it to other programs and programs like Adobe Captivate seem to lag behind other programs.  Oh and the Cloud stuff&#8230;.I still don&#8217;t get it (maybe I&#8217;m slow)</p>
<p>Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Corn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2013/02/of-drills-holes.html#comment-65493</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Corn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 20:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/?p=8546#comment-65493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dude. I still want the HTML layers. The copy layer style stuff is not useful when you have existing HTML and CSS but want to work on new designs based on that existing work. It is only good for setting up new sites and even then, it&#039;s pretty limited. Create a webkit rendered layer. It would be awesome!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude. I still want the HTML layers. The copy layer style stuff is not useful when you have existing HTML and CSS but want to work on new designs based on that existing work. It is only good for setting up new sites and even then, it&#8217;s pretty limited. Create a webkit rendered layer. It would be awesome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
