<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Lightroom Journal</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:blogs.adobe.com,2008:/lightroomjournal//125</id>
    <link rel="service.post" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.adobe.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=125" title="Lightroom Journal" />
    <updated>2008-05-13T06:33:43Z</updated>
    <subtitle>Tips and advice straight from the Lightroom team.</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.2</generator>
 
<entry>
    <title>DNG Specification and Vista DNG Codec</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2008/05/dng_specification_vista_dng_co.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.adobe.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=125/entry_id=5869" title="DNG Specification and Vista DNG Codec" />
    <id>tag:blogs.adobe.com,2008:/lightroomjournal//125.5869</id>
    
    <published>2008-05-13T06:03:02Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-13T06:33:43Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The DNG Specification has been revised and the version number incremented from 1.1.0.0 to 1.2.0.0. This is not an area of frequent change given that the format has done a good job of addressing the progress of raw formats over...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Tom Hogarty</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="General" />
            <category term="Philosophy" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/dng/pdfs/dng_spec_1_2_0_0.pdf">DNG Specification</a> has been revised and the version number incremented from 1.1.0.0 to 1.2.0.0.  This is not an area of frequent change given that the format has done a good job of addressing the progress of raw formats over the last three years.(The last update was finalized in February of 2005) &#160;This update addresses several industry requirements for the DNG  format including the formalization of the concept of a "camera  profile" and a metadata tag to validate your image data.&#160; <br />
                               The definition of a camera profile for the DNG format as well as the allowance for multiple camera profiles to be embedded in a  single DNG file will provide the industry with the ability to characterize raw data in an efficient and standardized format.(Think ICC profiles but for raw data) &#160;<br />
                           Additional metadata tags have been defined for the  DNG format including a field to indicate a 'hash' or the  integrity of the raw data within the file, providing a valuable tool for  validating the safety of your image data.&#160; A DNG file is comprised of three components: raw data from the sensor, metadata to describe the raw data and an embedded preview to represent your interpretation of the raw data. (See my <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2008/01/dng_in_the_news.html">earlier blog post</a> on DNG if you need more background) Writing metadata back to a standardized file format like DNG is a common operation but many are concerned about the sanctity of the image data from the sensor.&#160; The opportunity to 'fingerprint' that block of data and check it from time to time to ensure that there hasn't been any disk corruption or I/O errors is a significant step forward in ensuring the archival safety of your images.&#160; For the developer crowd, the <a href="http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/dng/dng_sdk.html">DNG SDK</a> has also been updated to reflect the changes to the specification.</p>
                               <p>The <a href="http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php?title=DNG_Codec">DNG Codec</a> for Windows Vista users is also now available as a free download from <a href="http://labs.adobe.com/">Adobe Labs</a>.&#160;&#160; This is our first release for the Windows Codec platform and before finalizing the release we're offering it as a 'Release Candidate' on Adobe Labs.&#160; A release candidate is a version of the technology that  is nearly complete but we would like the community's  help in ensuring compatibility across a wide variety of hardware and  software configurations.&#160; </p>
                               <p>On a final note, If you missed it earlier, you'll want to check out John Nack's blog post on the <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/05/dng_submitted_t.html">DNG format submission to the ISO</a>. <br/>
                            </p>
                           ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Invite Some Friends</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2008/05/invite_some_friends.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.adobe.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=125/entry_id=5794" title="Invite Some Friends" />
    <id>tag:blogs.adobe.com,2008:/lightroomjournal//125.5794</id>
    
    <published>2008-05-04T00:51:50Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-04T00:52:25Z</updated>
    
    <summary> The Lightroom 2 beta has two expiration dates.&amp;#160; If you already own Lightroom it&apos;s August 31st.&amp;#160; If you don&apos;t own Lightroom it&apos;s 30 days after you started testing the beta.(A 30 day trial) &amp;#160; I don&apos;t think anyone disagrees...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Tom Hogarty</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="General" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/">
        <![CDATA[
	<p>The <a href="http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/lightroom/">Lightroom 2 beta</a> has two expiration dates.&#160; If you already own Lightroom it's August 31st.&#160; If you don't own Lightroom it's 30 days after you started testing the beta.(A 30 day trial) &#160; I don't think anyone disagrees that it's important to reward the current owners for their purchase and use of the first version of Lightroom but we also don't want to discourage new customers from providing feedback on the future of Lightroom.&#160; To that end, we've provided current Lightroom customers with the opportunity to invite friends or folks they meet on the  forums to enjoy the beta through the end of August.&#160; Don't be shy.&#160; If someone has taken the time to provide feedback on the <a href="http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/webforums/forum/categories.cfm?forumid=72&amp;catid=678&amp;entercat=y">forums</a> and wants to continue using the beta beyond 30 days, send them an <a href="https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/entitlement/index.cfm?e=labs_lightroom_invite">invitation</a>.&#160; It's a quick process and I've already sent many invitations myself.&#160;<br />
	  The invitation link is <a href="https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/entitlement/index.cfm?e=labs_lightroom_invite">here</a>: https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/entitlement/index.cfm?e=labs_lightroom_invite<br />
	  Enter your Lightroom 1 serial number to authenticate the process and you'll be able to send up to 5 invitations at a time. (The invitee will receive an email with a serial number for use with the beta)
	</p>
  ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Lightroom 1.4.1 and Camera Raw 4.4.1</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2008/04/lightroom_141_and_camera_raw_4.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.adobe.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=125/entry_id=5610" title="Lightroom 1.4.1 and Camera Raw 4.4.1" />
    <id>tag:blogs.adobe.com,2008:/lightroomjournal//125.5610</id>
    
    <published>2008-04-11T02:45:33Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-11T02:17:10Z</updated>
    
    <summary> The Lightroom 1.4.1 and Camera Raw 4.4.1 updates have been posted to the following locations: Lightroom(Mac, Win), Camera Raw(Mac, Win).&amp;#160; The updates provide all of the changes included in the original Lightroom 1.4 and Camera Raw 4.4 releases but...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Tom Hogarty</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="General" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/">
        <![CDATA[ The Lightroom 1.4.1 and Camera Raw 4.4.1 updates have been  posted to the following locations: Lightroom(<a href="http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=3891">Mac</a>, <a href="http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=3892">Win</a>),  Camera Raw(<a href="http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=3893">Mac</a>, <a href="http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=3894">Win</a>).&#160; The updates provide all of the changes included in the original Lightroom 1.4 and Camera Raw 4.4 releases but also include corrections for issues described below and in previous blog posts.   The Camera Raw plug-in will also be available  later this evening via the Adobe Update Manager and the Lightroom update can be  located by choosing 'Check for Updates…' under the Help menu.  
The Lightroom and Camera Raw  team apologize for any inconveniences caused by the issues presented in the  initial updates

	<p>Lightroom</p>
	<ul>
      <li>Lightroom 1.4 incorrectly modified the EXIF time date field of       images that had a metadata update applied.        This incorrect modification does not appear in Lightroom or Bridge       and is only viewable through third party EXIF tools.  This error has been corrected in       Lightroom 1.4.1 and all files in a Lightroom catalog that have been       incorrectly modified will be corrected on their next metadata update.       (Metadata can be updated by selecting the files in the Library grid view       and choosing Command or CTRL + S to save and update the metadata.)</li>
	  <li>Olympus JPEG files could render incorrectly in Lightroom 1.4,       displaying an artifact in the exported file.</li>
	  <li>Any conversion to DNG in Lightroom 1.4 (Windows Only) would cause the DNG file to       become unreadable by Lightroom&rsquo;s Develop Module or Camera Raw 4.4 in       Photoshop.  The issue has been       corrected and files can be converted to DNG again in order to resolve       the issue for existing files.        Returning to the original native raw files is not necessary.  The affected DNG files can be selected       and converted again using the DNG Converter 4.4.1 available at <a href="http://www.adobe.com/dng/">www.adobe.com/dng/</a>.&#160; This process is not required but recommended to ensure that a correct validation value is stored within the DNG files. </li>
	  <li>Lightroom 1.4 provided degraded import performance relative to       Lightroom 1.3.</li>
    </ul>
	<p>Camera Raw</p>
	<ul>
      <li>Camera Raw 4.4 incorrectly modified the       EXIF time date field of images that were saved as TIFF or JPEG files from       the Camera Raw dialog.  This has       been corrected in Camera Raw 4.4.1</li>
	  <li>Olympus JPEG files could render       incorrectly in Camera Raw 4.4, displaying an artifact in the exported       file.<BR/>
	</li>
    </ul>
  ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Lightroom 2 beta Available</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2008/04/lightroom_2_beta_available.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.adobe.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=125/entry_id=5535" title="Lightroom 2 beta Available" />
    <id>tag:blogs.adobe.com,2008:/lightroomjournal//125.5535</id>
    
    <published>2008-04-02T06:05:07Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-02T05:46:43Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Version 2 of Lightroom is now available as a public beta, allowing the the photographic community to provide feedback on new features and workflow enhancements. It&apos;s hard to believe that Lightroom 1.0 was released just over a year ago and...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Tom Hogarty</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Develop" />
            <category term="General" />
            <category term="Library" />
            <category term="Print" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Version 2 of Lightroom is now available as a <a href="http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/lightroom/">public beta, </a>allowing the the photographic community to provide feedback on  new features and workflow enhancements.  It's hard to believe that Lightroom 1.0 was released just over a year ago and Lightroom 1.1 shortly thereafter.&#160; It really feels like the beta process never stopped and we've received a ton of great feedback through the feature request submissions, customer conversations, forum discussions, tradeshows and targeted customer visits.&#160;We're glad to continue the process by releasing this version before it's final to get your opinions on our progress.&#160; This is different from the previous Lightroom beta in that we'll be targeting feedback on new enhancements and aiming to release the final version sooner than we did in the previous year-long beta.&#160;&#160; I've provided a few key notes below but I strongly recommend reading the entire <a href="http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/lightroom/lightroom2_b1_releasenotes.pdf">Release Notes</a> document available on Labs.adobe.com.</p>
	<p><strong>Beta Eligibility</strong></p>
	<p>Q: Who is eligible for the   Lightroom 2.0 beta?<br />
	  A: 
    All Lightroom 1.0 customers.   Lightroom 1.0 customers can download and install Lightroom 2.0 beta for  use throughout the beta program</p>
	<p>Q: What about customers new to Lightroom?<br />
	  A: 
    Anyone can download the Lightroom 2.0 beta and try it for 30  days</p>
	<p>Q: How can new customers try the beta for the entire program?<br />
	  A: 
    An invitation program   through labs.adobe.com allows Lightroom 1.0 customers to invite  friends  to try the beta beyond  the 30 day trial until the beta expiration  date</p>
	<p>Q: When does the beta expire?<br />
	  A: 
    August 31, 2008</p>
	<p>&#160;</p>
	<p><strong>IMPORTANT NOTES, PLEASE READ</strong></p>
	<p><strong>Primary Known Issues</strong></p>
	<ul>
	  <li><strong>Lightroom 2.0 beta will not upgrade  Lightroom 1.x libraries.  </strong>The beta is intended to be used for testing  and feedback purposes.  Lightroom 1.x and  2.0 beta libraries will be migrated to the finished version of Lightroom 2.0.</li>
	  <li>While data loss is  not expected, this is a very early &lsquo;beta&rsquo; quality build and you should always  work on duplicates of files that are securely backed up.  </li>
	  <li>Lightroom 2 beta  will not overwrite or interfere with a machine that currently has Lightroom  1.3.1 installed.  </li>
	  <li><strong>Develop settings applied in Lightroom 2.0  beta are not guaranteed to transfer correctly to the final version of 2.0.  This is particularly true for localized  corrections.</strong></li>
	  <li>The new Photoshop  integration functionality is only available with Photoshop CS3 (10.0.1) and  should only be used for testing purposes.   Metadata associated with the original file may not carry over to the  subsequent file saved from Photoshop</li>
	  <li>Additional known  issues are listed in the release notes.</li>
    </ul>
	<p><strong>New Features<br />
	</strong><strong>Library</strong></p>
	<ul>
	  <li>Streamlined Library Layout</li>
	  <li>Smart Collections </li>
	  <li>Powerful Filter Bar to search and refine images</li>
	  <li>Suggested Keywords for simplified keywording</li>
	  <li>10k pixel size  limit raised to 30k pixels</li>
      <li>Output-based Collections <br />
      </li>
	</ul>
	<p><strong>Multiple Monitors:</strong> </p>
	<ul>
	  <li>-Four flexible modes for an alternate window:  Grid, Loupe, Compare, Survey<br />
      <strong>(</strong>Check out the  Live Loupe mode!)</li>
    </ul>
	<p><strong>Photoshop CS3  Integration:  </strong></p>
	<ul>
	  <li>Open files in Photoshop as a Smart Object</li>
	  <li>Select multiple images to merge as a Panorama </li>
	  <li>Merge multiple exposures into a single Photoshop HDR image</li>
	  <li>Load multiple files or virtual copies into Photoshop as  separate layers in a single document. </li>
    </ul>
	<p><strong>Export Functionality:</strong> </p>
	<ul>
	  <li>Auto-add exported images to the Lightroom catalog </li>
	  <li>Auto Output Sharpening for images on export</li>
    </ul>
	<p><strong>Develop Module</strong></p>
	<ul>
	  <li>Non-Destructive Localized Correction for dodging and  burning specific areas of an image </li>
	  <li>Post Crop Vignette</li>
	  <li>Basic Panel Keyboard Shortcuts</li>
	  <li>Improved Auto Adjustment</li>
      <li>Improved memory handling through 64-bit support on OS X 10.5 and Vista 64-bit.(Not limited to develop module) </li>
	</ul>
	<p><strong>Print Module</strong></p>
	<ul>
	  <li>Picture Package for multi-page layouts<br />
      </li>
	  <li>Print Module output directly to JPEG<br />
      </li>
	  <li>Enhanced Print Sharpening based on PhotoKit Sharpener  algorithms </li>
      <li>16-bit Printing for Mac OS X 10.5 </li>
	</ul>
	<p><strong>Additional Resources</strong></p>
	<ul>
	  <li>Lightroom video tutorials by Julieanne Kost:&#160; <a href="http://www.workshopsondemand.com/ps_lightroom/lrb2_p01">Lightroom 2 beta  Tutorial Part I</a> and <a href="http://www.workshopsondemand.com/ps_lightroom/lrb2_p03">Lightroom 2 beta Tutorial Part III.</a> (Part II is on the way) </li>
	  <li><a href="http://www.computer-darkroom.com/lightroom_2_beta/lr-2-beta.htm">Lightroom 2 beta preview</a> by Ian Lyons </li>
      <li><a href="http://digitalmedia.oreilly.com/adventure/">Lightroom Tasmania Adventure</a> </li>
	  <li><a href="http://www.outbackphoto.com/CONTENT_2007_01/section_workflow_basics/20080402_LR20Beta/index.html">Lightroom 2 beta review</a> by Uwe Steinmueller at OutbackPhoto.com.  </li>
	  <li><a href="http://www.utiliser-lightroom.fr/2008/04/01/bienvenue-a-la-beta-publique-de-lightroom-20/">Lightroom 2 beta review</a> for our French-speaking photographers</li>
	  <li><a href="http://www.photoshopcafe.com/lightroom/index.html">Photoshop Cafe</a> provides a feature review and 1 hour training video. </li>
	</ul>
	<p><strong>What about Lightroom 1.4?<br />
    </strong>Trust me, we haven't forgotten about the photographers who are awaiting a replacement to the Lightroom 1.4 update that we released and subsequently pulled from Adobe.com.  
	  Lightroom 1.4.1 and Camera Raw 4.4.1 are currently undergoing additional testing before we release them in the first half of April.  Thank you for your patience. <BR/>
    </p>
  ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Comments on 1.4 Release</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2008/03/comments_on_14_release.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.adobe.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=125/entry_id=5418" title="Comments on 1.4 Release" />
    <id>tag:blogs.adobe.com,2008:/lightroomjournal//125.5418</id>
    
    <published>2008-03-18T01:40:07Z</published>
    <updated>2008-03-18T01:40:33Z</updated>
    
    <summary> The entire Lightroom team is extremely sorry for any problems we&apos;ve caused our loyal customers with the March 14th 1.4 update. In our eagerness to get new camera support into customers&apos; hands as promptly as possible, we let some...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Tom Hogarty</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="General" />
            <category term="Philosophy" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/">
        <![CDATA[
	<p>The entire Lightroom team is extremely sorry for  any problems we've caused  our loyal customers with the March 14th 1.4 update. In our eagerness to get new camera support into customers'  hands as promptly as possible, we let some bugs slip past our testing that were  frankly unacceptable. Compared to other Adobe applications, we've taken a much  more aggressive approach to releasing frequent new versions with new features,  but it's clear we need to take a hard look at our release process to make sure  that this aggressive approach doesn't sacrifice quality. One thing that we may  consider is continuing the community approach we've taken in the past by  releasing betas of our updates, so that they can get the broadest testing  possible before they are certified as final.&#160;The timing for what will need to be a Lightroom 1.4.1 release has not been determined but updated information will be posted to this blog when available.&#160; <BR/>
    </p>
	]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Important Lightroom 1.4 and Camera Raw 4.4 Update</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2008/03/important_lightroom_14_and_cam.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.adobe.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=125/entry_id=5410" title="Important Lightroom 1.4 and Camera Raw 4.4 Update" />
    <id>tag:blogs.adobe.com,2008:/lightroomjournal//125.5410</id>
    
    <published>2008-03-16T23:37:15Z</published>
    <updated>2008-03-16T23:37:40Z</updated>
    
    <summary> The Lightroom 1.4 update for Mac and Windows has been temporarily removed from the Adobe.com web site.&amp;#160; Those Lightroom users who have installed Lightroom 1.4 should uninstall the update and install Lightroom 1.3.1.(Mac, Win) until a further update can...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Tom Hogarty</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="General" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/">
        <![CDATA[
	<p>The Lightroom 1.4 update for Mac and Windows has been temporarily removed from the Adobe.com web site.&#160; Those Lightroom users who have installed Lightroom 1.4 should uninstall the update and install Lightroom 1.3.1.(<a href="http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=3810">Mac</a>, <a href="http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=3815">Win</a>) until a further update can be provided.  For those not in immediate need of the updated camera support available in Camera Raw 4.4 or the DNG 4.4 Converter, it's recommended that you also continue working with the 4.3.1 versions. (<a href="http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=3818">Mac</a>, <a href="http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=3824">Win</a>) &#160;This decision is based on the following errors that have been discovered with the recent update: </p>
	<ul>
	  <li> <strong>EXIF Time Stamp  Error:</strong> There is an error in the EXIF time stamp update technology that causes Lightroom to believe that the files are out of sync with the correct time stamp as displayed in Lightroom.&#160;Any ensuing metadata update will attempt to incorrectly modify the EXIF time stamp in the original raw file itself.&#160; This is the only metadata field that Lightroom will write to an original proprietary raw file.&#160;This error will not impact the integrity of your image data.&#160; The Camera Raw plug-in also will incorrectly change the EXIF time stamp in files converted by the plug-in.&#160; The information written to the XMP sidecar files or XMP metadata in the converted files will remain correct.</li>
      <li> <strong>DNG Conversion Error</strong>(Windows Only): With the latest version of the Lightroom 1.4 and Camera  Raw 4.4 applications, Adobe has included technology to verify that the image data  in a DNG file is unchanged from when it was originally converted to DNG.&#160;  Unfortunately, when converting to DNG using Lightroom 1.4 on Windows, the  application will write an incorrect verification tag to describe the image  data.&#160; When Lightroom attempts to work with those files in the Develop  module, the application reads that incorrect tag, believes that there is  something wrong with the raw data and will present an error.&#160; Rest  assured, there is nothing wrong with the integrity of your image data or metadata.&#160;   For those that have already converted their files  to DNG using Lightroom 1.4(Windows only) we recommend using the DNG 4.3.1  converter to convert the DNG files you&rsquo;ve created with Lightroom 1.4.</li>
	  <li> <strong>Olympus Conversion  Error</strong>:&#160; There is an error in converting Olympus JPEG files to other formats in Lightroom 1.4 and the Camera Raw 4.4 plug-in.&#160;</li>
    </ul>
    <p>To uninstall Lightroom 1.4 please see the instructions per your platform:<br />
      <strong>Mac:</strong> Delete the Lightroom application in the Application folder(Mac) and Delete the following file:&#160; Library/Receipts/Adobe  Photoshop Lightroom.pkg <br />
      <strong>Windows:</strong> Choose the Uninstall Lightroom 1.4 menu item from the Windows start menu.&#160; The Add/Remove Program utility on Windows will also achieve the same result.&#160; </p>
    <p>To replace the Camera Raw 4.4 plug-in with the 4.3.1 plug-in, follow the manual installation instructions provided on the download page linked above. </p>
    <p>I will post additional updates to this blog as we have more information on the timing and scope of the future update. </p>
  ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Lightroom 1.4 and Camera Raw 4.4</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2008/03/lightroom_14_and_camera_raw_44.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.adobe.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=125/entry_id=5400" title="Lightroom 1.4 and Camera Raw 4.4" />
    <id>tag:blogs.adobe.com,2008:/lightroomjournal//125.5400</id>
    
    <published>2008-03-14T07:01:57Z</published>
    <updated>2008-03-14T06:53:36Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The Lightroom 1.4 and Camera Raw 4.4 updates have been posted to the following locations: Lightroom(Mac, Win), Camera Raw(Mac, Win).  The updates include support for the following new camera models: Canon EOS 450D (Digital Rebel XSi/EOS Kiss X2) Fujifilm S100FS...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Tom Hogarty</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The Lightroom 1.4 and Camera Raw 4.4 updates have been  posted to the following locations: Lightroom(<a href="http://www.adobe.com/go/lightroom_updates_mac_en">Mac</a>, <a href="http://www.adobe.com/go/lightroom_updates_win_en">Win</a>),  Camera Raw(<a href="http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=3893">Mac</a>, <a href="http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=3894">Win</a>).  The  updates include support for the following new camera models: </p>
	<div align="center">
	  <table width="457" border="0">
	    <tr valign="top">
	      <td width="96">Canon</td>
	      <td width="351">EOS 450D (Digital Rebel XSi/EOS Kiss X2)</td>
        </tr>
	    <tr valign="top">
	      <td>Fujifilm</td>
	      <td>S100FS</td>
        </tr>
	    <tr valign="top">
	      <td>Nikon</td>
	      <td>D60</td>
        </tr>
	    <tr valign="top">
	      <td>Olympus</td>
	      <td>SP-570 UZ</td>
        </tr>
	    <tr valign="top">
	      <td>Pentax</td>
	      <td>K20D</td>
        </tr>
	    <tr valign="top">
	      <td>Pentax</td>
	      <td>K200D</td>
        </tr>
	    <tr valign="top">
	      <td>Sony</td>
	      <td>A200</td>
        </tr>
	    <tr valign="top">
	      <td>Sony</td>
	      <td>A300</td>
        </tr>
	    <tr valign="top">
	      <td>Sony</td>
	      <td>A350</td>
        </tr>
      </table>
    </div>
	<p>Lightroom 1.4 and Camera Raw 4.4 include corrections for the  following issues:</p>
	<ul>
	  <li> Previous camera profiles identified in the Calibrate panel  of the Develop module may have displayed poor results at extreme ends of the  temperature and tint ranges. A new camera profile identified as Camera Raw 4.4  is now available and will be applied by default to all images without existing  Camera Raw or Lightroom settings. The creation of new default profiles will  also include the updated Camera Raw 4.4 profile. Images edited in Camera Raw or  Lightroom with earlier profiles will retain the earlier profile value and  visual appearance. </li>
      <li>In previous grayscale conversions the Color Noise setting  was disabled and this could result in an image with excessive noise when  grayscale channel mixing is applied.   Both the tool and effect have been enabled in Lightroom 1.4 and Camera  Raw 4.4 providing the ability to reduce noise in grayscale conversions.  In order to return to the prior visual  appearance, Color Noise reduction can be set to zero.</li>
	</ul>
	<p>Lightroom 1.4 includes corrections for the following issue:</p>
	<ul>
	  <li>Compatibility with legacy printer drivers on OS X 10.5  (Leopard) has been updated. I'd like to thank everyone who commented on my earlier <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2007/12/printing_on_leopard_with_light.html">post </a>regarding this topic.&#160; Some valuable feedback was provided and by working directly with Apple and Epson we are able to provide a resolution through this Lightroom update.&#160; </li>
    </ul>
	<p>As always, don't forget rule #5!</p>
	<p>Note: The Camera Raw plug-in won't be automatically updated via the Adobe Update Manager(AUM) until early next week. <BR/>
    </p>
	]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Happy Birthday Lightroom</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2008/02/happy_birthday_lightroom.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.adobe.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=125/entry_id=5119" title="Happy Birthday Lightroom" />
    <id>tag:blogs.adobe.com,2008:/lightroomjournal//125.5119</id>
    
    <published>2008-02-19T18:15:47Z</published>
    <updated>2008-02-19T18:16:19Z</updated>
    
    <summary> One year ago this morning at 12:01 AM Eastern Time, Lightroom 1.0 hit the streets, or Adobe.com at least, for the first time.&amp;#160; Lightroom isn&apos;t the only Adobe product that shipped on February 19th. The Camera Raw plug-in was...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Tom Hogarty</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="General" />
            <category term="Philosophy" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/">
        <![CDATA[
	One year ago this morning at 12:01 AM Eastern Time, Lightroom 1.0 hit the streets, or Adobe.com at least, for the first time.&#160; Lightroom isn't the only Adobe product that shipped on February 19th. The Camera Raw plug-in was first released as a plug-in for Photoshop 7.0.1 on February 19th 2003.&#160; And to the best of Thomas Knoll's recollection, Photoshop 1.0 shipped on February 19th, 1990.&#160; Jeff Schewe over at Photoshop News has compiled a great list of &quot;<a href="http://photoshopnews.com/2008/02/19/where-were-you-on-02-19-1990/">Where were you</a>?&quot; on the launch dates of Photoshop 1.0 and Lightroom 1.0.&#160; It's a fun read and Jeff is encouraging readers to add their own whereabouts on those dates. I  also looked back at some of the articles surrounding the launch of the Camera Raw plug-in in 2003 and Uwe Steinmueller's <a href="http://www.outbackphoto.com/artofraw/raw_04/essay.html">February 19th review </a>is still available on www.outbackphoto.com.&#160; I had to chuckle when I read Uwe's reference to &quot;...the impressive list of cameras supported right now.&quot;  That list only highlights about a dozen cameras of the close to 30 cameras supported with the first version of the plug-in but it's worth noting that 5 years later we're supporting over 180 camera raw file formats.&#160; How's that for impressive? (Insert shameless plug for DNG <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2008/01/dng_in_the_news.html">here</a> given the rapid growth in 
proprietary
 file formats.) &#160; <br />
	It's been an incredible year for the Lightroom team with <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2007/10/aperture_vs_lightroom.html">significant adoption</a> and several updates to address the needs of our customers.
	As noted on this blog <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2008/01/scott_kelbys_lightroom_wishlis.html">earlier</a>, we're excited about the future even if it doesn't necessarily take place on a February 19th.<BR/>
  ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>DNG in the News</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2008/01/dng_in_the_news.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.adobe.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=125/entry_id=4950" title="DNG in the News" />
    <id>tag:blogs.adobe.com,2008:/lightroomjournal//125.4950</id>
    
    <published>2008-01-25T20:49:03Z</published>
    <updated>2008-01-25T20:49:27Z</updated>
    
    <summary> Recent weeks have seen a number of DNG related announcements: Casio EX-F1: A 6 megapixel camera that captures 60 full resolution DNG files per second!(John Nack scooped me on this one) Pentax K20D and K200D: These new 14.6 and...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Tom Hogarty</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="General" />
            <category term="Philosophy" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/">
        <![CDATA[
	<p>Recent weeks have seen a number of DNG related announcements:</p>
	<ul>
	  <li><a href="http://exilim.casio.com/browse_cameras/exilim_pro/EX-F1/">Casio EX-F1</a>: A 6 megapixel camera that captures 60 full resolution DNG files per second!(John Nack <a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/jnack/2008/01/casio_spitfire.html">scooped</a> me on this one)</li>
	  <li>	  <a href="http://www.pentaximaging.com/products/product_details/digital_camera--K20D/reqID--10505894/subsection--digital_slr">Pentax K20D</a> and <a href="http://www.pentaximaging.com/products/product_details/digital_camera--K200D/reqID--10506029/subsection--digital_slr">K200D</a>: These new 14.6 and 10.2 megapixel cameras from Pentax can capture directly to the DNG raw format. </li>
      <li><a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0801/08012411samsunggx20.asp">Samsung GX-20</a>:&#160; The new DNG-capable Samsung 14.6 megapixel model is similar to the Pentax K20D but DPreview also looks at how it is <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/news/0801/08012412samsunggx20handson.asp">different</a>.  </li>
	  <li>Noritsu Koki has <a href="http://www.noritsu.co.jp/english/news/20080121.html">announced</a> their intention to support raw workflows at the photo retail level by utilizing the DNG format.&#160;</li>
    </ul>
    <p>For those not familiar with DNG, it's the archival raw format that <a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/dng/index.html">Adobe created</a> to address the proliferation of proprietary raw formats.&#160; With hundreds of undocumented formats introduced since the advent of raw capture, it's no wonder that the concept of a raw standard has elicited quite a bit of <a href="http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;q=dng&amp;btnG=Search+Adobe+Blogs&amp;domains=blogs.adobe.com/jnack&amp;sitesearch=blogs.adobe.com/jnack">discussion</a>.&#160;&#160; Much of the discussion revolves around the topic of file format obsolescence: Will I be able to open my raw files in 50 to 75 years from now?&#160; This is a good question and a valid reason why photographers choose to use the openly documented DNG format but there are other more immediate benefits to using a DNG workflow: </p>
    <ul>
      <li>Lossless  compression of the raw data can reduce file size anywhere from 10 to 40% or more.&#160; In a completely unscientific test I converted a small folder of Nikon D300 raw files to DNG and the folder went from 243MB to 125MB!&#160; You could almost double the number of photos stored on a single drive.&#160; I know 'storage is cheap' these days but it's not free! &#160; </li>
      <li>It  provides a documented file structure that can support writing metadata back to  the file.&#160; (No need for XMP sidecar files)</li>
      <li>You can  store an updated preview of the image in the DNG file that accurately  represents your latest non-destructive rendering settings.&#160; I think of it  as a job jacket for my images.&#160; I have the negative, the processing  instructions and a &lsquo;work print&rsquo; of how I last processed the image all within a  single file.</li>
    </ul>
    <p>With all of those benefits it's no surprise that 40% of Lightroom users who aren't shooting with a DNG-native camera have already decided to utilize the <a href="http://www.workshopsondemand.com/ps_lightroom/s06/">Convert To DNG</a> option while importing their photos.<BR/>
    </p>
  ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>New Lightroom community help system</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2008/01/new_lightroom_community_help_s.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.adobe.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=125/entry_id=4924" title="New Lightroom community help system" />
    <id>tag:blogs.adobe.com,2008:/lightroomjournal//125.4924</id>
    
    <published>2008-01-22T15:33:44Z</published>
    <updated>2008-01-22T15:36:32Z</updated>
    
    <summary>On behalf of Anita and the rest of the Adobe Documentation team, I’m pleased to announce the new Lightroom community help system, which provides core Adobe documentation for Lightroom as well as links to additional learning content from around the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Melissa Gaul</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="General" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/">
        <![CDATA[<p>On behalf of Anita and the rest of the Adobe Documentation team, I’m pleased to announce the new Lightroom community help system, which provides core Adobe documentation for Lightroom as well as links to additional learning content from around the web. The URL for the Lightroom community help system is http://learn.adobe.com/wiki/display/LR/Home.</p>

<p>The new site takes the current online help—LiveDocs—and makes it more useful and interactive. You can still navigate to topics using links the left side of the browser. But now, when you click a topic to read about it, you'll find a Basics panel with Adobe documentation as well as a Learn More panel that offers links to tutorials, white papers, technical articles, and other instructional content.</p>

<p>This site is administered by Adobe, moderated by experts from the community, and developed with the assistance of a panel of Lightroom Learning Advisors. So you'll also find links to the moderators’ and advisors’ favorite Lightroom sites, plus links to troubleshooting sites and a page that lists third-party presets, galleries, and extensions.</p>

<p>We invite you to visit, comment on our documentation, add links to your favorite tutorials and articles, and share your opinions by commenting on the links that others have posted. And feel free to send feedback on the site to us at lightroom-help-feedback@adobe.com.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Scott Kelby&apos;s Lightroom Wishlist</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2008/01/scott_kelbys_lightroom_wishlis.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.adobe.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=125/entry_id=4922" title="Scott Kelby's Lightroom Wishlist" />
    <id>tag:blogs.adobe.com,2008:/lightroomjournal//125.4922</id>
    
    <published>2008-01-22T04:27:49Z</published>
    <updated>2008-01-22T04:28:14Z</updated>
    
    <summary><![CDATA[ Scott Kelby posted a very articulate feature wishlist on his blog last Friday.  It really echoes all of the feedback that I&rsquo;ve received from customer visits, tradeshows, seminars, user forums and of course our feature request form.  The best...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Tom Hogarty</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/">
        <![CDATA[
	<p>Scott Kelby posted a very articulate feature wishlist on his  <a href="http://www.scottkelby.com/blog/2008/archives/932">blog</a> last Friday.  It really echoes all  of the feedback that I&rsquo;ve received from customer visits, tradeshows, seminars, user  forums and of course our <a href="http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform&amp;product">feature request form</a>.   The best part however is the subsequent dialog in the comments  section.  The tone and content of the  discussion is overwhelmingly positive and reminded me of how enjoyable it was  to work through various iterations of the Lightroom public beta in 2006.(Was it really that  long ago?)</p>
	<p>To be honest, the scope of Scott&rsquo;s list and the subsequent  comments could easily require 5 years or 5 more versions of Lightroom to 
accommodate
 but you&rsquo;ll  be happy to know that we&rsquo;re listening and anxious to deliver new and improved versions of Lightroom. (Some requests like the 'cold beer delivery' comment could require <a href="http://www.ubergizmo.com/zoom.php?img=beerserver_large.jpg">special hardware modifications</a>)&#160; A big thanks to Scott for pulling his list together and sparking the discussion! <BR/>
	</p>
	]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Printing on Leopard with Lightroom 1.3.1</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2007/12/printing_on_leopard_with_light.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.adobe.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=125/entry_id=4753" title="Printing on Leopard with Lightroom 1.3.1" />
    <id>tag:blogs.adobe.com,2007:/lightroomjournal//125.4753</id>
    
    <published>2007-12-17T02:29:16Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-17T02:29:43Z</updated>
    
    <summary> There are several comments on this blog that describe printing issues with Lightroom 1.3.1 on Leopard. &amp;#160;&amp;#160;For many these problems may not have existed before or perhaps the result is different from the current output of Photoshop CS3. &amp;#160;Before...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Tom Hogarty</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="Print" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/">
        <![CDATA[
    <p>There are several comments on this blog that  describe printing issues with Lightroom 1.3.1 on Leopard. &#160;&#160;For many  these problems may not have existed before or perhaps the result is different from  the current output of Photoshop CS3. &#160;Before I dive into the details lets  clear up a few definitions:</p>
    <ul>
      <li>Application Managed Printing - this is when you  set the printer profile in the application prior to printing. &#160;Typically  the profiles provided by printer manufacturers are designated by printer type  and paper type. &#160;You also have the ability to create custom profiles using  a third party hardware device. &#160;The most common error in Application  Managed printing is forgetting to turn off the color management options in the  settings available in the print dialog box. &#160;I recommend this workflow to  professional photographers.</li>
      <li>Printer Managed Printing - this is when you tell  Lightroom or Photoshop that the colors and conversion will be managed by the  printer. &#160;Adobe applications will send the printer a tagged file the  printer will then convert to an internal specification. </li>
      <li>Tioga - Legacy printer driver technology  introduced with Mac OS X 10.0 </li>
      <li>CUPS - Leopard's current printer driver  technology introduced with Mac OS X 10.2</li>
    </ul>
    <p>The root of the discrepancy between Pre-Leopard  and Post-Leopard printing results is the behavior of the underlying printer  driver technology.       &#160;Prior to Leopard, printer drivers could  use either the Tioga printer driver technology or the CUPS technology.  &#160;With the introduction of Leopard, CUPS is required and Tioga is no longer  a valid option. &#160;There was a large ecosystem of Tioga-based printer drivers  available prior to the Leopard release. &#160;Leopard has been released with  some CUPS-based printer drivers included and printer manufacturers are working  to provide updated drivers based on the newer technology.(Epson has posted beta  print drivers for its professional line here: <a href="http://www.epson.com/cgi-bin/Store/support/supAdvice.jsp?type=highlights&amp;noteoid=101603">Epson Beta Drivers</a>) &#160;But  clearly, the support for the newer printer technology is nowhere near as widespread  as the previous technology. &#160;One point of frustration is that while  older or partially compliant drivers can  generate a print the results are less then stellar. &#160;It may be  fine for anyone printing  out an invoice on their black and white laser printer but for photographers who  have grown accustom to extracting the highest fidelity out of their software  and printer, it's unacceptable. &#160;This is particularly true for those who  use an Application Managed print workflow. &#160;Printer Managed workflows may  generate 'ok' results but I don't know many photographers who are satisfied  with 'ok.'<br />
      <br />
    My recommendation for those dependent on  Lightroom's print functionality is to seek out a fully Leopard compatible  printer driver from the printer manufacturer.(<a href="http://www.epson.com/cgi-bin/Store/support/supAdvice.jsp?type=highlights&amp;noteoid=101603">Epson</a>, <a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=DownloadIndexAct&amp;fcategoryid=305">Canon</a>, <a href="http://welcome.hp.com/country/us/en/support.html">HP</a>)  &#160;&#160;This can be very frustrating for those using older printers that  manufacturers may not choose to update. &#160;As you can tell from Apple&rsquo;s  marketing, Leopard is a significant operating system(OS) upgrade and with OS  upgrades come compatibility issues.&#160; If you're able to share your experiences through the comments section, perhaps it will provide workarounds until compatible printer drivers are available.&#160; I will post updates on this issue as I receive new information. <BR/>
    </p>
    ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Lightroom 1.3.1 and Camera Raw 4.3.1</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2007/12/lightroom_131_and_camera_raw_4.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.adobe.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=125/entry_id=4678" title="Lightroom 1.3.1 and Camera Raw 4.3.1" />
    <id>tag:blogs.adobe.com,2007:/lightroomjournal//125.4678</id>
    
    <published>2007-12-06T06:21:21Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-07T19:33:24Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Lightroom and Camera Raw will be updated to 1.3.1 and 4.3.1 respectively within the next week.&amp;#160; These updates provide corrections for issues introduced in the last release as well as additional Lightroom Leopard compatibility. Camera Raw and DNG Converter 4.3.1...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Tom Hogarty</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="General" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Lightroom and Camera Raw will be updated to 1.3.1 and 4.3.1 respectively within the next week.&#160; These updates provide corrections for issues introduced in the last release as well as additional Lightroom Leopard compatibility. </p>
    <p><strong>Camera Raw and DNG Converter 4.3.1 Update</strong><br />
      For those experiencing the issues listed below, please update immediately to 4.3.1 using the downloads available here: <a href="http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=3818">Mac</a>, <a href="http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=3824">Win</a>.  
      The update will be available automatically via the Adobe Update Manager(AUM) within the next week. <br />
      -Compressed raw  files from the Nikon D100 were read incorrectly in Camera Raw 4.3<br />
      -A possible  artifact in Camera Raw 4.3 raw file support for the Olympus E-3 has been  corrected</p>
    <p><strong>Lightroom 1.3.1 Update<br />
      [UPDATE 12/7 - </strong>Downloads now available here:  <a href="http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=3810">Mac</a>, <a href="http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=3815">Win</a>   <strong>]</strong><br />
      I will post an update when Lightroom 1.3.1 is available for download within the next week.  Setting Lightroom's preference to check for updates will provide automatic notification  when the update is available.  The update will provide corrections for the following issues: <br />
-The Lightroom 1.3 Print Module could previously cause the  application to crash on either OS X 10.5 or 10.5.1 during template usage.   <br />
      -On Mac OS X 10.5 or 10.5.1, the import process from a card reader or other  device into Lightroom could fail to import all or a portion of the selected  images. <br />
      -A decrease in Develop slider responsiveness introduced in Lightroom 1.3 has  been corrected.<br />
      -The Lightroom 1.3 Develop module could cause the application to crash if  adjustments were made in quick succession.<br />
      -Compressed raw files from the Nikon D100 were read incorrectly in Lightroom  1.3.<br />
      -A possible artifact in raw file support for the Olympus E-3 has been  corrected.<br />
      -The Lightroom FTP Plug-in provided as sample code with the Export SDK did not  function properly if the password was not saved with the selected FTP preset.<br />
      -Editing or creating a new FTP preset immediately prior to using the FTP  plug-in provided as sample code with the Export SDK would cause the FTP process  to fail.<br />
    -Using the Export as Previous option did not work with the FTP plug-in provided  as sample code with the Export SDK.</p>
    <p>Per my earlier post, 
the Finder in Mac OS X 10.5 and 10.5.1 can crash when viewing files that  contain Lightroom XMP Snapshot data created in the develop module.   This is an error in how the Finder reads metadata and will require an  operating system update to solve. The error can be reduced for additional files going forward by modifying the Lightroom preference to  *not* save Develop settings within JPEG, TIFF or PSD files.  (Preferences: Catalog Settings: Metadata)</p>
    ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Lightroom 1.3 and Leopard</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2007/11/lightroom_13_and_leopard.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.adobe.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=125/entry_id=4557" title="Lightroom 1.3 and Leopard" />
    <id>tag:blogs.adobe.com,2007:/lightroomjournal//125.4557</id>
    
    <published>2007-11-17T01:04:55Z</published>
    <updated>2007-11-17T01:05:19Z</updated>
    
    <summary> The Lightroom 1.3 release addresses many Leopard OS X 10.5 issues but a few outstanding problems remain or have been discovered. Time Machine compatibility still remains unclear at this time.  Running Time Machine backup or restore operations while Lightroom...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Tom Hogarty</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="General" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/">
        <![CDATA[
	<p>The Lightroom 1.3 release addresses many Leopard OS X 10.5  issues but a few outstanding problems remain or have been discovered.</p>
	<ul>
      <li>Time Machine compatibility still remains unclear  at this time.  Running Time Machine  backup or restore operations while Lightroom is in use is not recommended until  more information can be obtained.   Interim solutions:</li>
	  <ul>
        <li>Have Time Machine exclude the directories where Lightroom catalogs are stored and  use Lightroom to backup the catalog files</li>
	    <li>Run  Time Machine when Lightroom is not running.</li>
      </ul>
	  <li>There is a bug in the Lightroom 1.3 Print Module  that can cause the application to crash on either OS X 10.5 or 10.5.1.  Minimizing the template preview in the upper left corner can help  reduce the frequency of this issue.</li>
	  <li>The Finder in Mac OS X 10.5 and 10.5.1 can crash  when viewing files that contain Lightroom XMP Snapshot data created in the  develop module.  This is an error in how  the Finder reads metadata and will require an operating system update to solve. (I believe that this occurs more frequently with JPEG or TIFF files) </li>
      <li>Importing directly from a card may not copy all of the image files or may fail.&#160;Please copy the images to a local drive using the Finder first if you experience problems. </li>
	</ul>
	<p>We will provide an update to address the print module issue  but have not set a release date for that update.<BR/>
	</p>
	]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <title>Lightroom 1.3, the Export SDK Preview and Camera Raw 4.3</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2007/11/lightroom_13_the_export_sdk_pr.html" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.adobe.com/cgi-bin/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=125/entry_id=4551" title="Lightroom 1.3, the Export SDK Preview and Camera Raw 4.3" />
    <id>tag:blogs.adobe.com,2007:/lightroomjournal//125.4551</id>
    
    <published>2007-11-16T05:03:00Z</published>
    <updated>2007-11-27T00:09:55Z</updated>
    
    <summary>The Lightroom 1.3 and Camera Raw 4.3 updates have been posted to the following locations: Lightroom(Mac, Win), Camera Raw(Mac, Win).  The updates include support for the following new camera models: Canon &amp;#160;&amp;#160;        EOS 1Ds Mark III Canon &amp;#160;&amp;#160;        PowerShot G9...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Tom Hogarty</name>
        
    </author>
            <category term="General" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The Lightroom 1.3 and Camera Raw 4.3 updates have been  posted to the following locations: Lightroom(<a href="http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=3810">Mac</a>, <a href="http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=3815">Win</a>),  Camera Raw(<a href="http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=3818">Mac</a>, <a href="http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=3824">Win</a>).  The  updates include support for the following new camera models:</p>
	<p>Canon &#160;&#160;        EOS 1Ds Mark III<br />
    Canon &#160;&#160;        PowerShot G9<br />
    Nikon&#160;&#160;         D3<br />
    Nikon&#160;&#160;         D300<br />
    Olympus&#160;&#160;     E-3<br />
    Olympus&#160;&#160;     SP-560 UZ<br />
    Panasonic &#160;&#160;  DMC-L10</p>
	<p>Lightroom 1.3 also provides improved support for the OS X  10.5 Leopard operating system.   </p>
	<p>For me, the most exciting part of this release is that we'll  be providing a preview of the Export SDK on Labs.adobe.com.&#160; The Export  SDK is a glimpse into what's possible with a workflow SDK. (Think direct export  from Lightroom to Flickr/Smugmug/FTPHosts/etc)&#160; I categorize Lightroom's  extensibility into two different SDK opportunities: Workflow and Image  Processing.&#160; There are expectations around an Image Processing SDK given  Photoshop's plug-in history.&#160; But Lightroom will focus on a workflow SDK  initially to enable better interoperation between Lightroom and other tools or  services before  providing the ability to add an image processing plug-in like  a lens correction plug-in or noise/grain plug-in. The Lightroom Export SDK  preview is the Lightroom product team's first opportunity to engage the  developer community. While this preview SDK functionality is limited to the  Export dialog, the <a href="http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/webforums/forum/categories.cfm?forumid=72&catid=647&entercat=y">discussion</a> should be expanded to include any  functional area that a developer would like to build upon.</p>
	<p>The SDK can be found <a href="http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/lightroomsdk/">here</a>:   
      <a href="http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/lightroomsdk/">http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/lightroomsdk/</a> &#160;&#160; Join the <a href="http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/webforums/forum/categories.cfm?forumid=72&amp;catid=664&amp;entercat=y">discussion</a> and tell us what you think.	</p>
	<p>Don't forget rule #5!</p>
	<p><strong>Update 11/17</strong> <br />
    For those experiencing difficulities reaching the Lightroom download links above, please use the following:<br />
    <a href="ftp://ftp.adobe.com/pub/adobe/lightroom/mac/1.x/LTRM_WWEFG_mac_1_3.dmg">Mac: 
    ftp://ftp.adobe.com/pub/adobe/lightroom/mac/1.x/LTRM_WWEFG_mac_1_3.dmg</a><br />
<a href="unknown:">Win: 
ftp://ftp.adobe.com/pub/adobe/lightroom/win/1.x/LTRM_WWEFG_win_1_3.exe</a> </p>
	]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed> 

