SWF And FLV 10 Specs
The version 10 updates of both the SWF and FLV specs are available for your inspection:
Here are some of the things added, changed, or corrected:
- new DefineBitsJPEG4 tag (90), with deblocking filter
- new DefineFont4 tag (91)
- described how to embed Speex into SWF and FLV
- described how to embed XMP metadata in FLV
- new flags in the FileAttributes tag describe whether a SWF requires the new 'gpu' or 'direct' WMODEs (only useful when running a SWF in a standalone player where there is no encompassing HTML to specify WMODE)
- new flag in DefineShape4 describes whether the shape uses fill winding rule
- rearranged some chapters to (hopefully) make the SWF spec flow better
- revised DefineBitsJPEG2 and DefineBitsJPEG3 to mention how they can be used to store GIF and PNG data as well as JPEG (as can the new DefineBitsJPEG4 tag; yes, the tag names are a bit misleading, but they're a bit too entrenched to be changed now)
- revised description of the Flash Screen Video v2 codec format
- in F4V, several signed values were incorrectly marked as unsigned
- fixed description of Flash ADPCM (initial predictors are signed, not unsigned; block size was off by 1)
- both documents now thoroughly describe which parameters (channels, bit resolution, sample rate) are fixed or flexible depending on the audio codec
- the FileAttributes tag came about in SWF 8 rather than SWF 1
- fixed the FileAttributes tag, which specifies a Metadata data structure -- not a SymbolClass -- with the hasMetadata flag
- in ButtonRecord and PlaceObject3, list the correct codes for the difference, add, and subtract blend modes
- PlaceObject3 tag description was missing a bitmap caching byte (should have been there since SWF 8 spec)
- in FillStyle, a GradientMatrix is also present for fill style 0x13
- SWF spec now uses "opacity" instead of "transparency" in many places in order to more accurately describe blending behavior
- clarified the maximum length of a SWF file
- fixed several examples
- fixed numerous inconsistencies in the Actions chapter
Thanks to Michael, Baptiste, both Benjamins, Bobby, Amol, Cody, Matthew, Romi, and anyone else I might have missed who also offered corrections and suggestions for improvements.
Comments
How about some RTMP protocol specifications, please?
Posted by: Mikael Gueck | November 16, 2008 11:01 PM
thank you for this, works great on my centos64 box! :-)
Posted by: Amir | November 20, 2008 7:12 AM
Cool! Does that free up resources to get the 32-bit Linux platforms (Ubuntu for PPC, Yellow Dog Linux for PPC) going again?
Posted by: Ralph Hyre | December 29, 2008 4:19 PM
Nice to see so good informations. Very good blog.
Posted by: twojeanonse | January 20, 2009 12:16 PM
Thank you. Great work.
Posted by: Rene | February 23, 2009 11:44 PM