Wishlist for future Captivate releases
Now that Adobe Captivate 4 is here and how, it would be nice if you folks could tell me the things that were on your wishlist that we missed in this release. I have my own secret list that I plan to pass on to the team soon, and if you could meanwhile send yours, we should have enough to keep Santa Claus busy. Clauses apply.
Comments
I'd like to see the ability to assign multiple actions on a rollover...specifically, highlight AND rollover text/image.
Posted by: Jeni | March 13, 2009 09:23 PM
Michael: Thank you for your inputs. I have passed them on to the product team. As I said, I am just the messenger here.
Posted by: preran | February 27, 2009 08:04 PM
Oh yeah...RULERS and GUIDES! (Sorry, but the grid is just annoying and only works on the background)
Posted by: Michael Laudone | February 26, 2009 10:10 PM
Another item (can you tell I'm working on a project now?)
Show the object names in the timeline. 15 "buttons" is not helpful but "Save button" "Help Button" would be.
Posted by: Michael Laudone | February 26, 2009 09:41 PM
I've been using Captivate since it was RoboDemo and this version ROX! That said, of course, I want more :-)
Posted by: Michael Laudone | February 26, 2009 08:36 PM
WOW! don't get me started! :)
a few thing poping in my head. i have my own list somewhere that i wanted to write adobe about (found you site by accident).
very important is while recording to see the number of the frame beeing recorded. this way if i do something a few times, i could write my self the markers. being able to define markers while recording will be better..
2. would really like to create mouse movment. this way if i don't want millions of slides in my project i could copy the mouse action and put a set of related actions in one slide..
3. bigger preview of slide in the sound edit window will be good. also to be able to look at the slide while its open - will be great. cause i want to be able to see the actions on the slides.. (if say i have a swf then picture then Swf - i don't want to see just the final picture cause sometimes it won't help recognizing it..
4/ library - the ability to sort by slide - all objects on slide one and ex..
also if objects will be named slide 1 - background.. slide 1 - background2 ex'.. would help recognize it. but i do that my self any way.
also library - is i could group it by slides - will be great.
(the unused items sort - wonderful! BTW).
5. the ability to create a swf from a few slides - like what i said about the mouse earlier.. so swf slides without exporting\publishing it..
i have to go so i'll continue later.. i'll save the link and my mail is ontop :)
Posted by: hila | February 25, 2009 11:43 PM
I forgot the NUMBER ONE thing that would instantly improve Captivate:
PLEASE FIX THE TRANSPARENT CAPTION TEXT FUZZINESS ISSUE!
That alone would be worth an upgrade to me!
mark
Posted by: Mark Siegrist | February 22, 2009 07:49 AM
1. Provide the source fla to the TOC and Aggregators so that we can customize the look and feel. If you can't do that, at least externalize *every* possible property in it via an xml file so that we can do things like:
a. Modify colors with more granularity (ie, those ugly gradients used in the TOC).
b. Disable the slide total time. The toc ini file doesn't allow this.
c. ???
2. As Steve said in a previous comment - the ability to call more than one method at a time in response to a single event. You cannot do this in CP4.
3. The code/script entry in CP4 is extremely slow. Extremely slow.
4. A wish that will never come true (but should!) - rewrite the Captivate swf api to allow for actionscript to be used on them instead of those limited 'variables'.
5. A simple motion editor for objects. If the export to Flash actually worked this wouldn't be a too big of a deal but it's very buggy.
6. Better integration with Adobe Connect Training. Like the aggregator. I haven't tested this myself yet but I read on the forums that the tracking does not work when the aggregator is used. That is inexcuseable.
7. Like other person asked - enable us to change the start position of the mouse pointer on a slide.
mark
Posted by: Mark Siegrist | February 22, 2009 07:44 AM
If you click on a graphic there are effects for fade in/fade out etc.
Its a shame you cant add more effects here. I used to use Authorware and there was a wide range of effects you could add to a graphic.
There are transitions between slides (Must admit i rarely use those) but would like to add different animations to graphics on the stage apart from the usual fade in / out.
Posted by: Paul J | February 10, 2009 08:38 PM
Some inital thoughts:
1. CSS/DW or similar style to create more effective, re-useable movies across multiple projects.
2. A simply one - on Zooms and an option of 'Time to Zoom Back' - the reverse of the 'Time to Zoom'.
3. MUST DO - give developers the chance to push the interactive scores into a format that can be be read by non-LMS based systems.
4. I second an update on the Advanced Actions interface.
more to come...
Posted by: Tim Lucas | February 5, 2009 05:06 PM
I understand the reasons behind making the mouse pick up in the same spot from one slide to the next, but it's still stupid. I want to be able to reposition the mouse's start point on any given slide. CHANGE THAT.
Posted by: Daniel | February 5, 2009 07:52 AM
1. Aggregator skin that can be resized or minimized by end user.
2. Exposed scripting and variables for Aggregator skin to enable more control over navigation.
3. More and better audio loops in the Gallery.
4. A simplified interface for scripting custom actions.
5. Rollover states for the borders of rollover areas for rollover captions and images.
Thanks for listening!
Posted by: Steve Wilhite | February 5, 2009 03:15 AM
Thank you! I have passed on your requests to the product team. Meanwhile, here's an update on some of the requests.
Ability to call multiple Actions in response to a single event: Available in CP4
Faster Editor: CP4 is relatively faster. Have you checked it?
Ability to simply type actions/More functionality - giving, for eg, the ability to calculate with arrays, animate screen content dynamically etc.: Could be too advanced for Captivate.
Cleaner, faster native Form controls - maybe a version of the Flex controls: Tried widgets?
I most want to see a really good drag and drop image question type. I've been waiting for this since Captivate version 1: Try widgets
True ActionScripting of Captivate (not CP Scripting): Use Flash.
Keep them coming. Reasonable ones have a fair chance of making it I should admit.
Cheers,
Preran
Posted by: preran | February 4, 2009 03:56 PM
I most want to see a really good drag and drop image question type. I've been waiting for this since Captivate version 1.
And then I want:
- True ActionScripting of Captivate (not CP Scripting).
- Ability to tween any object so that we can move things around the stage instead of just fading them in and out.
- Integration with Flash within Captivate that at least matches (or beats) the integration now achieved with (choke...) PowerPoint.
And about five dozen other things.
Posted by: Rod Ward | February 4, 2009 05:59 AM
More advanced Actions - including
- Arrays
- Ability to call multiple Actions in response to a single event
- Faster Editor
- Ability to simply type actions.
- More functionality - giving, for eg, the ability to calculate with arrays, animate screen content dynamically etc.
- Ability to export and import scripts
Then, away from Actions, how about CSS skinning, like we can do with Flex?
Cleaner, faster native Form controls - maybe a version of the Flex controls.
Just for starters :-)
Posted by: Steve Howard | February 4, 2009 05:25 AM
Ability to add motion path to objects. Kind of like the timeline based Flash development. It would really benefit presentation and animation aspect of Captivate.
Posted by: Ning | February 4, 2009 01:53 AM
Please do something about video. Not everyone is set up with a Flash Streaming Server. I can't believe more people aren't complaining about this. Video should be at the top of the list.
Posted by: Justin Mass | February 3, 2009 09:12 PM
Mac compatibility
Posted by: Mike | February 3, 2009 12:46 PM