Legal
The views expressed in this blog are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Adobe Systems Incorporated.
Search
November
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
Archives
November 21, 2005
The World has Changed
For those of us raised on duck and cover drills in grammar school during the cold war and who remember being told by radio and tv announcers to not play in the snow because Chinese nuclear weapons testing might have made it radioactive, the world has a definite new feel to it sometimes.
The other day I was listening to NPR and heard them report that the US has suggested that Iran can have a nuclear power program as long as they allow a trusted third nation to perform the final processing that could result in weapons grade material. The US suggested that the trusted third party nation be Russia.
The world has certainly changed!
Bill
November 15, 2005
Old versus New AI
I just returned from the International Semantic Web conference in Galway. A very good conference delivering a large number of important papers and convincing me that semantic Web applications are beginning to emerge into the real world..
But later I was discussing AI techniques with some folks at PARC and at Adobe the other day and a couple of questions arose.
My comment was that while the current crop of AI techniques work and work well, they do not reflect what we do when we reason or when we perform instinctual activities. The question came back, "Does a computer have to do things the way we do to be intelligent."
My answer was "no, not at all". You cannot argue with the success of fuzzy logic, vision processing algorithms that are increasingly able to understand the contents and purpose of photos, document understanding systems that can restate the menaning of text in new words. These are all amazingly powereful and successful technologies.
However, my other comment was that it would be fascinating to work on the other problem, to reproduce what we do when we think, plan, understand, and create And I do not believe we will achieve emergent intelligence similar to our own until we pursue that harder and less travelled path.