Lightroom 3.2 and Camera Raw 6.2 Available on Adobe Labs

Lightroom 3.2 and Camera Raw 6.2 are now available as Release Candidates on Adobe Labs.  (Download here: Lightroom 3.2, Camera Raw 6.2, including the DNG Converter 6.2)  The ‘release candidate’ label indicates that this update is well tested but would benefit from additional community testing before it is distributed automatically to all of our customers.

WAIT!  What happened to Lightroom 3.1?  Well, it never happened.  In order to simplify the presentation of updates for raw file format compatibility, the Lightroom and Camera Raw “dot” version numbers have been aligned at “2″.  We update the Camera Raw plug-in and Lightroom regularly to provide access to new proprietary raw file formats and have aligned the decimal place so that there’s no confusion over which Lightroom update corresponds to a Camera Raw plug-in update and vice versa.

The final releases of Lightroom 3.2 and Camera Raw 6.2 may have additional corrections or camera support.

New Features

  • The ability to publish directly to Facebook from within the Library module

New Camera Support in Lightroom 3.2 and Camera Raw 6.2 Release Candidates

  • Casio EXILIM EX-FH100 (DNG*)
  • Leica S2 (DNG*)
  • Panasonic DMC-FZ100
  • Panasonic DMC-FZ40 (FZ45)
  • Panasonic DMC-LX5
  • Pentax 645D
  • Samsung NX10
  • Samsung TL500 (EX1)
  • Sony A290
  • Sony A390
  • Sony Alpha NEX-3
  • Sony Alpha NEX-5

*The DNG raw file format is supported in previous versions of Lightroom and Camera Raw. This update improves the color and noise profiles for these models.

New Lens Profile Support in Lightroom 3.2 and Camera Raw 6.2 Release Candidates

Lens Mount Lens Name
Canon Canon PowerShot S90 Lens
Canon Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS
Canon Canon EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro USM
Canon Canon EF 14mm f/2.8L II USM
Canon Canon EF 24mm f/1.4L II USM
Canon Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM
Canon Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II
Canon Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM
Canon Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM
Canon Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM
Canon Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS USM
Nikon Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR
Nikon Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR
Nikon Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 50mm f/1.4G
Pentax smc PENTAX-D FA645 55mmF2.8AL[IF] SDM AW
Pentax smc PENTAX-FA645 33-55mmF4.5AL
Pentax smc PENTAX-FA645 35mmF3.5AL[IF]
Pentax smc PENTAX-FA645 45mmF2.8
Pentax smc PENTAX-FA645 45-85mmF4.5
Pentax smc PENTAX-FA645 55-110mmF5.6
Pentax smc PENTAX-FA645 75mmF2.8
Pentax smc PENTAX-FA645 80-160mmF4.5
Pentax smc PENTAX-FA645 MACRO 120mmF4
Pentax smc PENTAX-FA645 150mmF2.8[IF]
Pentax smc PENTAX-FA645 150-300mmF5.6ED[IF]
Pentax smc PENTAX-FA645 200mmF4[IF]
Pentax smc PENTAX-FA*645 300mmF4ED[IF]
Pentax smc PENTAX-FA645 300mmF5.6ED[IF]
Pentax smc PENTAX-FA645 400mmF5.6ED[IF]
Samsung Samsung EX1
Samsung Samsung 18-55 f/3.5-5.6 OIS
Samsung Samsung 30mm f/2
Samsung Samsung 50-200mm f/4-5.6 ED OIS
Phase One Schneider LS 80mm f/2.8 (For 645DF System)
Nikon SIGMA 17-50mm F2.8 EX DC OS HSM (Nikon mount)
Nikon SIGMA APO 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG OS HSM (Nikon mount)
Sony Sony E 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 OSS (For NEX System)
Canon Zeiss Distagon T* 3,5/18 ZE
Canon Zeiss Distagon T* 2,8/21 ZE
Canon Zeiss Distagon T* 2/28 ZE
Canon Zeiss Distagon T* 2/35 ZE
Canon Zeiss Makro-Planar T* 2/100 ZE
Canon Zeiss Makro-Planar T* 2/50 ZE
Canon Zeiss Planar T* 1,4/50 ZE
Canon Zeiss Planar T* 1,4/85 ZE
NIKON Zeiss Distagon T* 2/28 ZF.2
NIKON Zeiss Distagon T* 2/35 ZF.2
NIKON Zeiss Distagon T* 2,8/21 ZF.2
NIKON Zeiss Distagon T* 2,8/25 ZF.2
NIKON Zeiss Distagon T* 3,5/18 ZF.2
NIKON Zeiss Makro-Planar T* 2/50 ZF.2
NIKON Zeiss Makro-Planar T* 2/100 ZF.2
NIKON Zeiss Planar T* 1,4/50 ZF.2
NIKON Zeiss Planar T* 1,4/85 ZF.2
Canon Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USMt
Canon Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USMt
NIKON Nikon AF Nikkor 50mm f/1.8Dt

tThese lens profiles were in the previous release but have been updated to address quality concerns.

Bugs Corrected in the Lightroom 3.2 Release Candidate

The following bugs that were released as part of Lightroom 3.0 have been corrected. The team appreciates the very detailed feedback the community has provided on the Lightroom 3.0 release and we’re excited to correct a number of issues experienced by our customers. These issues have been FIXED

  • Develop: A custom aspect ratios get rounded to nearest standard ratio when adjusting crop overlay
  • Develop: A history state is incorrectly added after creating a preset that includes a graduated filter or lens profile correction
  • Develop: In the crop mode the X key sets a photo to reject instead of rotating the crop (Windows only)
  • Develop: Lens profile corrections were synced even when they were not selected in the sync dialog.
  • Develop: The escape key incorrectly applies a crop after a CTRL/CMD right arrow with the crop tool enabled
  • Develop: The local adjustment brush could have a very slow first stroke when exposure is the selected adjustment
  • Develop: The Live Loupe view on a second monitor could become unresponsive when switching images in the Develop module
  • General: Certain menu items were missing from the Windows version of Lightroom
  • Help Documentation: Inaccuracies and translation errors were corrected throughout the help documentation
  • Import: Copy as DNG selection not remembered for subsequent imports
  • Import: For some devices the import dialog did not allow directory browsing
  • Import: Import image number sequence is not incrementing properly
  • Import: Panels in the import window fail to scroll via the mouse wheel in some multiple monitor configurations
  • Import: The EXIF renaming token was not available
  • Import: Windows could crash when attempting to import video files
  • Library: Sub-optimal preview rendering performance could impact application performance
  • Library: If a directory tree is collapsed prior to closing Lightroom it will appear expanded after re-launching the application
  • Library: 1:1 preview generation could appear to repeat itself for DNG files
  • Library: Importing keywords causes a catalog to hang when imported keywords already exist in the catalog
  • Library: Attempting to drag and drop a folder when multiple folders are selected removes a folder
  • Library: Cancelling a catalog backup can require an excessive wait time before the cancellation is complete
  • Library: Cancelling a catalog export process could require an excessive wait time
  • Library: An internal error could occur when published smart collection conditions are updated
  • Library: Choosing to apply recent keywords in a keyword set would cause the recent keywords to reorder
  • Library: Clicking the metadata flag on an image in the filstrip acts incorrectly on the selected image in the grid view
  • Library: Failed publish comments remain in the comment box across different images
  • Library: Flickr Publish Collection publishes to a Photostream in the reverse of the expected order
  • Library: Grid scrolling in a publish collection with the hand tool could fail (Windows only)
  • Library: Importing from a catalog fails when both catalogs contain images from the same folder
  • Library: In Smart Collections a hyphen (“-”) Is now treated as a word delimiter for “contains words”
  • Library: In the IPTC Date Created field the seconds could be incorrectly removed on writing to XMP
  • Library: Lightroom 2 search criteria “+abc” meant “starts with abc” and “abc+” meant “ends with abc”. This was reversed in Lightroom 3
  • Library: Moving a stack to another folder only moves the top image and unstacks the remaining images
  • Library: Panning an image at 1:1 while the image is still loading can cause Lightroom to crash (Windows only)
  • Library: Ratings and Labels were not propogated to a TIFF or PSD file created for an Edit in External Application workflow
  • Library: Saving metadata on a folder is inccorectly labeled as “undoable”
  • Library: Scrolling or louping through many photos can cause Lightroom to start paging aggressively
  • Library: Setting “Caption is Empty” in a smart collection failes for some images
  • Library: Setting “Rating is Zero” incorrectly includes all images in a catalog
  • Library: Setting rating “is not” in a smart collection fails to include unrated photos
  • Library: Smart collection exposure time incorrectly limited to 1,000 seconds instead of 100,000 seconds.
  • Library: The “metadata for this photo has changed” dialog box lacks clarity
  • Library: The keyword list will fail to display properly if there are database integrity problems
  • Library: The save metadata command was incorrectly available when a video file was selected
  • Library: There is no warning when incorrect data types are entered into IPTC fields
  • Library: Updating DNG Previews and Metadata is incorrectly labled as “undoable”
  • Library: Upgrading a Lightroom 2 catalog via the import catalog function will fail if duplicate files are present
  • Library: Using an exclamation point in search criteria fails to work properly
  • Print: A faulty or corrupt print template could cause a “nil” error message when changing templates
  • Print: Image loses “pan” position when placed in cells that are not big enough
  • Print: Lightroom could crash while preparing a print
  • Print: The Print to JPEG save dialog box resets for every save
  • SDK: A URL could fail to open properly in a web browser (Mac only)
  • SDK: Calling info.publishedCollection:getName() from within updateCollectionSettings() causes “can only wait within a task” exception.
  • SDK: copyrightState was not documented (Will be corrected when documentation is posted with the final release)
  • SDK: Errors during collection or collection set update callbacks are not recognized when a collection or collection set is created
  • SDK: Function “withPrivateWriteAccessDo” lacks clear behavior documentation (Will be corrected when documentation is posted with the final release)
  • SDK: Lightroom does not respect the default system web browser (Windows only)
  • SDK: Per comment URLs were incorrectly included in the documentation (Will be corrected when documentation is posted with the final release)
  • SDK: Plug-in error reports “nil” instead of proper filename
  • SDK: Renaming a publish collection dissasociates it from collectionSettings
  • SDK: setEditedFlag does not work as intended
  • SDK: The publish icon size was incorrectly documented as 26 pixels instead of 24 pixels wide
  • Slideshow: Exporting a video that will overwrite an existing video that is currently being played will cause Lightroom to crash (Windows only)
  • Tethered Capture: The develop settings text was misaligned (Windows only)
  • Web: In-line editing of Site Info stops working if a number is entered
  • Web: Setting “sequence” as the title or caption fails to work properly
  • Web: Certain galleries do not handle accented characters properly
  • Please provide feedback on your experience with the Lightroom 3.2 Release Candidate Bug Report Form.

Camera Raw 6.2 Release Notes

  • Scroll bar arrow performance has been improved
  • Please provide feedback on your experience with the Camera Raw 6.2 plug-in and the DNG Converter on the Camera Raw User to User forum.

Thank You

A big thanks to everyone who submitted bug reports, posted entries in the U2U forums and blogged their issues so that we could improve both Lightroom and Camera Raw in this update.

120 Responses to Lightroom 3.2 and Camera Raw 6.2 Available on Adobe Labs

  1. Pingback: Lightroom 3.2 is Now Available | Ivan Makarov Photography Blog

  2. Pingback: Lightroom 3.2 Release Candidate posted. - Lightroom Blog

  3. Christian says:

    My version of LR3.0 says there are no updates available… Should I wait or download manually?

    • Gagandeep Singh says:

      Hi Christian,
      These versions of LR and CR are release candidates(RC). You have to manually download these or you can wait for final release, which will show on your updates.

    • Ange says:

      This is a RC (release candidate) version, so is close to being the full release but there might be some changes before that. You won’t be prompted to update within LR3 until the full version is released.

    • “…are now available as Release Candidates on Adobe Labs”
      You will not receive Release Candidates through the update interface in Lightroom.
      Download manually or wait for the final release.

    • Franz says:

      This is not a released version, it’s a Release Candidate. Only released version automatically appear as an update for LR.
      If you suffer from one of the bugs corrected, I would download and install, otherwise wait for the release.

    • Steve Sprengel says:

      This is a public beta (release candidate) that needs to be downloaded and installed manually.

  4. Thomas says:

    there are no updates available for your LR3.0
    this is a LR3.2 RELEASE CANDIDATE – to be downloaded and installed separately – and NO, you DO NOT want to use this RC in productive manner, it is a test version of the upcoming final version meant to provide feedback about the fixed bugs

  5. renambot says:

    It’s a Release Candidate, not an official update yet, so you have to download it manually.

  6. Pingback: Le versioni R.C. di Lightroom 3.2 e Camera Raw 6.2 | setteB.IT

  7. Dennis says:

    Lightroom 3.2 and Camera Raw 6.2 are now available as Release Candidates on Adobe Labs.

    Wait till it’s finalized.

  8. Pingback: Lightroom 3.2 and Camera Raw 6.2 Available on Adobe Labs – Shrenik Vikam

  9. Pingback: Lightroom 3.2 RC is available on Adobe Labs (and so is Camera Raw 6.2) — morethanwords.be

  10. Pingback: Lightroom 3.2 steht in den Startlöchern – neue Objektivprofile

  11. Nik Player says:

    Christian, this is a release candidate, not an official release so you will have to download it and it test it alongside your 3.0 version.

  12. Pingback: Inside Lightroom » Blog Archive » Lightroom 3.2 and Adobe Camera Raw 6.2 available on Adobe Labs

  13. Pingback: Вышли Lightroom 3.2 и Adobe Camera RAW 6.2! | Светлая комната

  14. Pingback: Adobe Lightroom 3.2 kommt | Photowalking Munich

  15. GN says:

    It’s only a release candidate. Only the final release will be automatically detected

  16. Gheorghita Teodoru says:

    No word on the following develop module bug: selecting a picture re-renders the preview although the settings were not modified in any way. I hope the final release will correct that.

  17. Pingback: Adobe lanza las release candidates de Lightroom 3.2 y Camera Raw 6.2 | Fotografia.com

  18. Looks like a great release; I look forward to the release version.

    Here’s a bug I discovered in 3.0:
    I created develop preset that includes lens correction (auto profile, 0% distortion, 100% c. abberation, and 0% vignette). The preset was built from a photo that used a Nikkor 18-200mm lens, so that lens is applied to all images that use the preset. Since I created the preset with “Setup: Auto”, shouldn’t the lens be picked up from the affected image, instead of always showing up as 18-200mm. Additionally, if I apply the preset, and then select the correct lens (e.g., Nikkor 24-70 f/2.8), as soon as I move one of the Amount sliders, the lens reverts to 18-200mm. Feel free to contact me if you require any additional information.

    Keep up the great work! Thanks.

  19. John Driggers says:

    1. Where can I find a comprehensive list of all the lenses supported in LR3, not just the release candidate?

    2. Why wasn’t the NEX pancake lens included? Any plans to include?

    Thx

  20. Pingback: Lightroom 3.2 to fix bugs, add Facebook support | HiTech Dot Com

  21. Eric says:

    This a Release Candidate, not a final release. You have to download it manually!

  22. Pingback: Lightroom 3.2 and Camera Raw 6.2 are now available as Release Candidates on Adobe Lab

  23. Pingback: Вышел Release Candidate Lightroom 3.2 | Фотоблог Евгения Булатова

  24. Joe Colson says:

    Christian,

    The “Release Candidates” are not picked up by the LR “Check for Updates” process. Only when it is finally released will LR 3.2 be automatically distributed by that mechanism. You can decide whether to download manually by reviewing the changes listed and determining whether any affect your workflow. Or download manually to provide feedback to Adobe prior to the final release.

  25. Jens says:

    Hey, is there a roadmap which Canon lenses will be profiled by Adobe in the future? And even more importantly, how can I access user generated profiles which have been uploaded throu the Lens Profiler? Thanks

  26. Kirill says:

    It’s probably not an appropriate place for feature request, but perhaps somebody from Adobe takes notice of it:
    - it would be cool to have an additional brush in develop mode, namely colder warmer. I think it would also be relatively easy to implement.
    - it would be great to be able to assign custom key shortcuts to presets. Currently possibly only with 3rd party software.

  27. Zack Jones says:

    @Christian: Download manually. This is a pre-release of a Lightroom update. Once it is officially released you’ll see a notification in Lightroom.

  28. Pingback: Adobe releases new Release Candidates for Lightroom 3.2 and Camera Raw 6.2 | The Digital Photo Experience

  29. Pingback: Thai Brothers’ Sharing Blog » Blog Archive » Lightroom 3.2 to fix bugs, add Facebook support

  30. Hey Christian, it’s a release candidate, meaning it’s a separate download for testing. It’s not a full release.

  31. Charles says:

    How are the chances that the Samsung TL350 (WB2000) will also be supported?

  32. Nikonuser says:

    16-85 yay!
    Any Idea when the Tokina 12-24 will follow?

    thnx!

  33. Steve Cooke says:

    STILL no support for the Fuji Finepix S200EXR ?? How many people have asked for this? Come on Adobe – sort it out.

  34. vv says:

    Will you add more Tamron lenses in the final 3.2 release? Canon/Nikon/Sigma/etc. are all quite well represented but I miss most of the Tamron lenses that are rather common amongst photographers.

  35. James Clarke says:

    Nice update but.. still no GeoTagging?

  36. Ben Olivares says:

    Any idea about support for more camera models in Tethered Capture mode?

  37. Thank you guys for addressing all these issues! Great work! :-)

  38. ikiru says:

    Why not lens profile for Zuiko/Olympus?

  39. Dave says:

    This looks like a lot of good enhancements/fixes. If I could through something into the hat… In the watermark utility, add the option of numbering the images for proofing. So if you highlight 50 images, it would allow you to place a semi-transparent number on each image from 1 to 50… When customers do online proofing, if they have questions they could refer to an image by its number because some flash based websites do not show the file name.

    Just a thought.

  40. Nils says:

    Still no lens profile for Nikon AF-S DX NIKKOR 17-55mm f/2.8 :-(

  41. Pingback: Lightroom 3.2 and Camera Raw 6.2 | M. Lorenz Fotografie

  42. Pingback: Lightroom 3.2 to fix bugs, add Facebook support | Mohinder's Blog

  43. Paul says:

    Still no AVCHD = FAIL

  44. Pingback: Lightroom 3.2 and Adobe Camera Raw 6.2 Available on Adobe Labs « Digital Daily Dose

  45. Pingback: Вышел Release Candidate Lightroom 3.2 | Цифровые фотокамеры - новейшие разработки, цифровые камеры и видеокамеры

  46. Pingback: Lightroom 3.2 RC : Bachus unmaßgebliche Meinung

  47. Michael says:

    Any chance you’re going to be releasing lens profiles for Pentax DSLRs? If not now, hopefully it’s on the rest of the todo list.

    Thank you,

    Michael

  48. ryba says:

    I don’t see a fix for the following problem: http://forums.adobe.com/thread/668980?tstart=0
    It seems like a very easy thing to fix, a basic feature, yet working inproper in 3.0 ;(
    Very important feature if you use LR for precision web publishing.

  49. Dan Vomastek says:

    Tom:

    There is still a bug with not all fonts showing up in the edit watermarks dialog box. When I click on the drop down list, some of my installed fonts do not appear.

    Windows 7 64-bit.

    D

  50. Joe Jones says:

    What I want the most is to see pixel dimensions when doing crops. For the company I shoot for they require a specific picture size (2166×1600 pixels). While I can set a custom crop RATIO I have no idea when I’m actually cropping less than my require pixels. If I crop less than my requirement LR will uprez the picture and I lose quality (or I can choose to use the actual crop size which won’t met my company’s needs. Please, Adobe, this is an easy one! Either include the exact pixel dimensions as I drag my crop or give us a ruler.

  51. Pingback: Lightroom 3.2 Release Candidate includes Camera Raw 6.2 | TranquilPhotos.com

  52. Christian says:

    Ooops, missed that. But if this is 3.2RC, where is 3.1?

    • Dianne A says:

      Christian – read the 2nd paragraph of the post!

    • @Christian -

      Tom wrote at the top of this piece that there is no version 3.1 – Adobe is calling this first update “3.2″ to align the point release numbers with Camera Raw, to avoid confusion about which goes with which.

      That is an impressive number of bugs fixed, thank you.

  53. frederick says:

    The whereabouts of 3.1 is described at the top of the post.

  54. Pingback: Adobe Lightroom 3.2 and Camera Raw 6.2 Release Candidates | canon rebel eos digital slr camera

  55. Tom White says:

    Import Dialogue – can we always have the option of selecting any of the following “copy as dng / copy / move / add.”

    when plugging in a card via reader on my PC i cannot move the files over, only copy. I understand copying is a safe option but having the option to move files straight over to a HD would speed up the import in certain situations where time is crucial.
    Thanks.

  56. David Naylor says:

    Checking it out. Looks good so far!

    BTW, thanks for fixing the Flickr publishing order!

  57. Christian L says:

    Impressive list of fixes, thanks! I hope you’re working on more new features, such as geotagging (using EXIF tags, map functionality, proximity, etc) and face recognition.

  58. Christian,
    The “missing” 3.1 is also explained in the article above.

  59. Pingback: Weekly Worth-a-click | Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Killer Tips

  60. Is this a bug: when working in the develop module and clicking on a picture in the filmstrip in many cases not only that picture is selected but I’m also switched back to the Library module. This is rather annoying for then I have to switch back to the develop module again! Has anyone else seen this?

  61. John Kennington says:

    Anyone got the Facebook plugin to work. It doesn’t show in the export list for me.

  62. Meg says:

    Myself and other professional photographers in my community who use lightroom 3.0 have noticed significant sharpening/noise added to all images processed in lightroom. This is incredibly frustrating! I shoot with a Canon 5D Mark 2, so even at ISO 1600 these images should be smooth. However, regardless of ISO setting, processed files are noticeably over sharpened/noisy. When it comes to print enlargements for clients this is a major issue! This did not happen in earlier lightroom versions. The same RAW file edited in different software does not have the same problem, this is exclusively a lightroom issue. As a professional I unfortunately can not use lightroom to edit my images as it compromises the images’ integrity beyond what I can give to a client. Any suggestions or thoughts on when this will be fixed?

  63. David says:

    from Adobe:

    “What happened to Lightroom 3.1? Well, it never happened. In order to simplify the presentation of updates for raw file format compatibility, the Lightroom and Camera Raw “dot” version numbers have been aligned at “2″. We update the Camera Raw plug-in and Lightroom regularly to provide access to new proprietary raw file formats and have aligned the decimal place so that there’s no confusion over which Lightroom update corresponds to a Camera Raw plug-in update and vice versa.”

  64. Julian says:

    Thanks for the many bug fixes…any chance that tethering for Canon Rebel T2i can be added?

  65. Dorin Nicolaescu-Musteață says:

    >Library: Lightroom 2 search criteria “+abc” meant “starts with abc” and “abc+” meant Library:
    Yes, that’s now corrected, but when one is using both ”+abc+”, in Lightroom 2 it means ”starts with AND ends with abc”, while in Lightroom 3 it means ”starts with OR ends with abc”

    > Setting “Rating is Zero” incorrectly includes all images in a catalog
    Yes, now that works, but only the first time. If you modify the SC to ”rating is X”, where X≠0, and then back again to ”rating is 0” — the smart collection includes all images again. By the way, that is the case for all operators, not only ”is”.

  66. Pingback: Lightroom 3.2 and Camera Raw 6.2 Release Candidates | lightroom-blog.de

  67. Thomas Kuhn says:

    I still have the problem on my last years MacBook Pro, that Lightroom grabs so much RAM just by viewing pics. With every pic I preview it grabs around 25 MB, another 25 MB with the next and so on. When I do some work in the development module, it ends up with Lightroom needs 2.5 GB of RAM. At that point no more work is possible, because Lightroom never frees any RAM. It´s only growing. The only chance to work on the next picture is to quit Lightroom and start all over…and again and again. I have the problem since Lightroom 3.0 and hoped it would be fixed in 3.2 but it´s getting even worse.

  68. Pingback: Lightroom 3.2 Release Candidate Available on Adobe Labs

  69. Pingback: Lightroom 3.2 to fix bugs, add Facebook support | Games 4 Downloading

  70. Phil Hall says:

    I have a Samsung EX1 so I’m glad to see that lightroom supports it’s RAW files now. However, does this mean I need to upgrade now to lightroom 3.0, or is there a way to get RAW support for lightroom 2.7?

  71. John Hamish says:

    How about a lens profile for the 7D kit 18-135? I mean come on you should have the kit lenses covered by now.

    John

  72. Pingback: D'wald » Lightroom 3.2 behebt Fehler und führt Facebook-Support ein

  73. Pingback: Lightroom 3.2 RC: publicacion en Facebook y nuevos perfiles de objetivos : Lightroom ES

  74. Zappa says:

    LR3 Bug Fix Request (can’t see them in beta 3.2)

    1. Slideshow > Soundtrack > Fit To Music doesn’t work. Some say it slows the music right down; I find it simply ignores the length of the track and plays the slide show till it’s done without changing display time / transition to fit track length.

    2. Can’t batch rename Virtual Copies. This makes VC’s unusable. E.g. app; Print > Contact sheet. I want to include colour options for same file so my client can choose. I can’t rename then A,B,C or 1,2,3, or use custom text or any of the text in metadata because IT GIVES THEM ALL THE SAME NAME regardless of any variations per file! Edit one and it changes them all, even if only one was selected.

    C’mon Adobe, please, please please! :-)

  75. Pingback: LightRoom 3.2 + ACR 6.2 Release Candidate. Денис Бондарь

  76. Hi,

    Thanks a lot for all this information! This is great! So many new lens profiles, especially for Canon lenses :-)

    I will spread the word about the updates on my blog: http://photoshoplightroombridge.co.uk/

    Regards,

    Marek Mularczyk

  77. Matthis says:

    The release notes for LR 3.2 RC above mention that there is now a lens profile for the Canon S90 lens. This is inaccurate at best, as the profile is only for RAW files and NOT for JPEGs.
    I would really like to see a complete profile (i.e. for RAW and JPEG) in the final version. Or, at least, explicitly state that the profile is for RAW only, to avoid confusion and disappointment.

  78. Anthony Braime says:

    Just installed 3.2 because 3.0 started crashing on import (it had been ok). However, 3.2 still crashes.

  79. Coyote says:

    Sadly, the long expected lens profile exchange seems still nowhere to be found. :(

  80. Markl says:

    When I sharpen an image full screen, go to the next image and then back it’s no longer visible. This is very confusing.
    You need to zoom in/out to see it again. This is still there in 3.2 and was’t so in the trial version.

  81. Francis Dorsemaine says:

    Is there a way to report a “perceived” bug? (LR3/LR3.2RC)

  82. Dilip says:

    Thanks – this looks like an impressive list! I had reported a few bugs including one of improperly listing a sample renamed file when selecting export file naming – the bug was acknowledged but can I hope that it will still be fixed in a future release? Thanks for the great and timely work, LR team!

  83. Hervé RIGAULT says:

    I stil have a difference of centration beetween what I get on the screen and what is printed. This bug had been corrected ont LR2.

  84. Pingback: Lightroom 3.2 Beta and Camera Raw 6.2 available « Photoshop Lightroom Bridge

  85. Hans says:

    I assume LR3.2RC will work with a current valid license for LR3.
    Also I assume that LR3.2RC will expire sometime. When?
    Will one be able to upgrade to the next full version like LR3.2 ?
    In short: LR3.0 >> LR3.2RC >> LR3.2 are they valid with same license?

  86. Jason says:

    I see you still haven’t fixed that bug of not deleting the contents off the memory card after importing. Silly to think Adobe plays big brother and won’t even give me the option to delete the contents of the memory card after importing. Why give me any ability to alter the image? I might mess something up. Should only allow me to apply auto white balance and auto tone. Same line of thinking not giving the option to erase the card after import.

  87. Ken Erickson says:

    There is a bug with the filmstrip photos in the develop module in 3.2 RC, I just had a group of them turn almost black (the highlights show as real dark grey) when I click on one it shows up the same way in the develop window momentarily then goes to normal. Almost looks like I am holding the Alt key down while adjusting the exposure (but not quite the same appearance). Windows 7 x64

  88. Francis Zera says:

    >Library: Ratings and Labels were not propogated to a TIFF or PSD file created for an Edit in External Application workflow

    Thank you for fixing this! I had several phone conversations with the developers about this and am stoked that it’s been addressed. I’ll download the release candidate right now and give it a try with some sample data.

  89. Steven says:

    I really like the publish to Facebook feature, just wondering if it will support multiple Facebook albums in the future… That would be very handy!

  90. Jason says:

    When will you add the ability to to erase memory cards after import? This is one sorely missed feature. I understand eliminating that as a default option, but one should at least have the option! Choice is good :)

  91. Don says:

    I have the current version of Photomatix Pro loaded as an HDR plugin for Lightroom 3.0. When I try to export the series of images from Lightroom to Photmatix, I get the following message:

    Info

    Plugin did not start correctly

    Please check whether you invoked the plugin by choosing ‘File > Plug-in Extras’

    The process that I used in Lightroom was to hold down CTRL and select the 5 images while in Lightroom 3.0. The I right clicked, went to Export and then to Photomatix Pro which appears in the list. After doing this, I receive the above message.

    The way that I installed the software was to first have Lightroom 3.0 installed and updated. Then I installed the Photomatix Pro software and answered the question during installation that I wanted to use it as a plugin in LR. That was it.

    I just discovered something. In LR I went to File, Plugin Extras, Export to Photomatix Pro and this worked!!!! There is evidently a problem with the right click, export to a plugin. Don’t know how to pass this on to the developers so if someone does, please do so.
    Thanks, Don

  92. Mick says:

    Has anyone noticed a problem when you hover over the filmstrip at the bottom of the screen, a tooltip constantly flickers.

  93. Ken Erickson says:

    LR 3.2 RC – Windows 7 x64 – Canon raw from 5d – I am getting black thumbnails in the strip at the bottom and when processing some of the images are coming out black also. There are bits of color showing where the highlights are almost blown out (looks like holding Alt while adjusting exposure kind of) and some of the exported photos are coming out this way. Going back to the photos in develop module they are showing up with no value on the exposure slider and if I adjust the slider it shows back up and everything is fine again.

  94. Reza Farivar says:

    Any plans to introduce GPU acceleration (CUDA, OpenCL) to lightroom like in photoshop? Zooming into the pictures takes about 10~12 seconds of 100% CPU utilization on both the cores of my core 2 duo laptop(macbook pro), while lightroom says loading. I can’t stick any more CPU cores in the laptop, but there is a nice GPU there waiting to be used.

    So, is there any plans in the pipe to use GPUs?

  95. Pingback: Lightroom 3.2 and Camera Raw 6.2 Now Available « Lightroom Journal

  96. I installed LR 3.2 but the new lens profiles don’t show up. Anyone having a similar problem? I confirmed within LR that I am using 3.2.

  97. Erick says:

    Thx for update. :)

  98. Want to be able to change camera setting will tethered in Lightroom.

  99. Ondrej Uhlir says:

    I would be really happy if we got more options in watermark editor.

    For example in CS3 are imho usefull options like: Outer/Inner Glow, Drop shadow.

  100. Stan Robins says:

    There remains a serious bug in LR3 that was not addressed in 3.2. During export to jpeg (and probably TIFF — haven’t tested that), GPS data in the EXIF is stripped and placed somewhere else in the file. This doesn’t occur with saves to jpeg from Photoshop (CS4), which leaves GPS data in the correct EXIF fields. The result is problems with mapping sites, notably Smugmug, which only reads standard EXIF GPS.

    The GPS data in the resulting jpegs might look “normal” to specialized geotagging apps like GeoSetter which know where to look, but an EXIF reader such as Irfanview will quickly confer that the standard EXIF GPS fields are empty.

    There is a workaround if you use the Friedl Geoencoding plugin. Always enable the Friedl GPS Injector, EVEN IF YOU PREVIOUSLY WROTE DATA FROM THE GEOENCODING PLUGIN BACK TO THE IMAGE FILE. The Injector fixes the problem in exported jpeg images.

  101. Neil Yellin says:

    Using 3.2 release and there seems to be a bug in the spot remover tool. It is hanging the program for anywhere from a few seconds to minutes after dragging the sample circle. Worst case I’ve had to force the program closed. Not certain but I think a larger circle makes it worse.

  102. user7415 says:

    I have to post not exactly a bug but an improvement…

    Do you remember old lightroom 2 fashioned import screen? Yeah.. it worked far better than the actual one in lightroom 3 concerning network volume import or such stuff…

    My workflow is based generally on duplication of card on a network nas/server, then i browse them using another fast raw viewer and then add in lightroom… okay when i do it with lightroom 3 it is terribly slow because it read all directory contents from the network drive instead do a fast listing before…

    I also noticed that listing content is not stored in cache so when you decide to import another photo again from that drive you must reload allll that stuff again…

    Consider it when you are working with network directories with 10.000 raw files and you get a really really slow workflow :(

    With lightroom 2 all import stuff were really faster than lightroom 3

    Please improve import stuff :|

    Thank You :)

  103. Mariann says:

    When I am downloading to lightroom 3.2 ,the screen will go pitch black and will not return to program. Also ,will not allow me to export without burning a disk .

  104. nelson says:

    I just installed LR3 and updated to 3.2. Problem is that it can’t read the CR2 files from my Canon EOS 30 D

  105. I use LR 3.2 in Windows 7 64bit. When using the adjustment brush a couple of item are missing from the roll down menu. Everything below “color” has gone. So no “dodge” or “soften skin” etc.

  106. Jim says:

    problems exporting to DVD in windows 7 64 bit in Lightroom 3.2 64 bit
    I can export to flash drive but not DVD why?

  107. I’m getting an error that LR 3.2 can’t find the lens profile for a recent wedding however I know it has worked in the past on at least 5 other weddings. What happened and how to fix it?

    Please help!

  108. khan says:

    this i a very fantastic software. i really like it…

  109. Al Siegel says:

    Does LR 3.2 support the Nikon D7000 in tethered mode? the D7000 RAW format is supported now, but not tether.

  110. Pingback: Lightroom 3.2 and Camera Raw 6.2 Available on Adobe Labs | Global Community of Photography